He remains undefeated. No matter how you spin it, the plinkett reviews will remain ironclad and absolute in their arguments, becoming the reason why george sold star wars. It's just icing on the cake that disney managed to run the IP into the ground as quickly as they did, potentially destroying the last remaining cash cow hollywood had. Not only did they meticulously expose george as the hack that he is but also underscored the parasitic cynicism that drives hollywood productions as a whole. praise be to plinkett.
Disney raped meAnd this fat retard watched
Whom is this?
>>223598590>TFA was everything I hoped it to be >I LOVED ITNobody should take these hacks seriously
>>223598709first impressions got the better of him but this does not undermine the legitimacy of the prequel reviews or the sequel reviews for that matter despite the latter being weaker analyses.
>>223598769Retard, Mike had to backtrack and beg Disney to start using Lucas's ideas, despite saying he had no ideas in the Plinkett reviews. The reviews have aged like dogshit.
Ngl George Lucas should have directed people to their seats was a bar
>>223598788>Mike had to backtrack and beg Disney to start using Lucas's ideas, despite saying he had no ideas in the Plinkett reviewsprovide source
>>223598801Their Rise of Skywalker review
>>223598816he didn't mean it like that
>>223598590I watched The Phantom Menace a while back and with subtitles I noticed a line or two that I and probably many others including the guy who made those videos missed. The gist is that when Qui-Gon Jinn talks about the Gungan gods demanding a life debt, he's not making that up but actually just restating what Jar Jar Binks told him directly. Jar Jar is hard to understand and he's annoying, so both the characters and the audience are ignoring him when he said this but he undeniably does.
>>223598709Also them shitting on Rogue One (the best Disney Wars movie) because it has familiar things from that era.
>>223598930Jar Jar is universally hated only because he talks like a retard.
>>223598769>this does not undermine the legitimacy of the prequel reviewsIt absolutely does, but those reviews were just them being retarded on purpose anyway. Sorry nobody likes nu wars op!
>>223599497So do c3po and chewbacca, you're just an eternally asshurt gen x retard
>>223598590>It's just icing on the cake that disney managed to run the IP into the ground as quickly as they didlmao at pretending to be smug about this when that fat retard and his fans expected the sequels to be good and softballed them bigly when they turned out to be irredeemable garbage far worse than the pt
>>223598590Nice try, Mike. Geroge won by selling to Disney. By handing it to the people who would make the movies like fat retarded boomers like you wanted he exposed how utterly clueless and pathetic you really are. This damage control will never stop being hilarious.
>>223599557It's hilarious that the shitquels are far worse than the prequels, but RLM can't say that because they sucked off the force awakens
>>223599737It goes far beyond that. Take away the old Plinkett reviews from RLM and what will you get? A bunch of losers and shills with no opinion worth of listening to.
>>223599529i said the sequel reviews were still valid despite being weaker, the new star wars films also suck.
>>223599540Threepio is just zesty and we can't even understand what Chewie says.
I haven't watched much of there other stuff but the prequel review's are certified poetry
>>223600018Does it rhyme?
>>223600123This line has lived in my head since I first watched the reviews Bravo lucas
It was funny video, but prequels are still better than every single Disney Wars production. They are soulful, memorable and filmen with memes.>You wanna buy some deathsticksThis scene is better than any scene episode 7-8-9
>>223600191nostalgia is blind ignorance, don't fall for it. not implying disney wars suck as well but the prequels are whole other level of braindead schlock made for the sole purpose of george increasing his net worth. nothing artistic or worthy about those piles of shit.
>>223600385don't suck*
>>223600385>great casting>great fight choreography>iconic art direction>iconic soundtrack>impressive special effects for their time>the most ambitious story that is a true epic tragedy>massively expanded the universe especially with tie in mediaNever slander the prequels or pretend like they're comparable to Disney Slop ever again.
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>223600540They’re movies you liked because you saw them as a child
>>223600819Wrong. I discover more things to appreciate every time I watch them.It helps when you actually engage with the expanded universe material that helps flesh out important characters.
>>223598590They’re still funny videos to go back on, but the prequels are nowhere near as bad as Disney’s shit. Hell, I’d say Filoni’s Clone Wars was the beginning of the end, and diluted what made the prequel era so interesting. I’d say at this point, Filoni is bogging down the franchise with Clone Wars bullshit and his Ahsoka obsession.I mean, as long as they don’t touch The Old Republic era, I could care less. I don’t consider anything by Disney to be canon.
>>223600887>i keep rewatching movies i only like because i saw them as a childthat isn't a refutation of the fact you only like the movies because you saw them as a child
>>223601023So if I watched Citizen Kane as a child I can't call it good?
>>223600957The Filoni baloney is a major repellent to SW fans who were too old for the Clone Wars series when it came out. Against my better judgment I decided to give the Ahsoka series a shot, and I lost interest when I realised it was a live action sequel to the childish Rebels cartoon with the Aladdin kid. A direct sequel, meaning the audience is expected to be up to speed with everything that happened in the cartoon. WTF, Filoni. If it's part of the cartoon continuity then make it a cartoon. If it's live action then people will expect something more akin to the movies. There should be a line of separation between the two kinds of media. I'm uncomfortable when that line is blurred.
>>223599345Thank you for admitting you're a moron, anon.
>>223601461Mike, you like the sequels and The Acolyte. Crying about AT-ATs being in Star Wars isn't a criticism.
>>223600540>great this>iconic that>impressive thisIt's mad that idiots like you try to pass yourself off as intelligent when this is all your small brain is capable of.This is why you will forever be below RLM's level. You're a moron.
>>223601023They just made them better back then
>>223598590He has a fair amount of criticism but a lot of his arguments boil down to "ug I don't like how this creative desicion was handled."
>>223601478>a-aha you must me mike and but you like-Again, a blithering idiot like yourself is unable to break anything down in detail. For you it's all "but you like this, but he likes that".Just utterly bereft of any brains. You're stupid, champ.
>>223599345>movie where they asspulled an explanation and killed off everyone in the end is the best Funny way to say Solo
>>223599345Lmao, your opinion is so shit. Thats a garbage movie and i dont care about your faggy political intrigue andor. That movie is balls.
>>223601436Filoni dropped the fucking ball big time. He’s become more of a detriment to the franchise than a saviour.
>>223601482Not an argument.>>223601501Done crying yet?>>223601511The best Star Wars movies are tragedies everyone knows this.Solo wasn't the worst thing ever but it was boring and cheapens Han Solo's character.>>223601512The third act has some of the best action in the entire franchise.
>>223601560Argument for what? Do you really think saying "great this, iconic that" is valid film critique? It's the same old worthless dross that idiots like you roll out when you're too stupid to write with even a tiny modicum of detail.Again, you're a moron. You're worthless.
>>223601597Funny how you say nothing when people use negative buzzwords but heaven forbid someone points out good things in the prequels.
>>223601625>buzzwordsThis is all your tiny brain can even compute.Plinkett did a comprehensive critical analysis of the prequels and explained in great detail why they're bad and fail in every area of filmmaking.You're a tiny-brained idiot on 4chan saying "this is great, this is iconic".Once again, you're a worthless pile of trash, stupider than a monkey.
>>223601668Okay Mike.
>>223601684You're free to cope by calling me "mike" at your leisure, but deep down, you know you're low IQ, and know you're a moron with no leg to stand on.You finish up in this thread humiliated, completely and utterly defeated. That's all there is to it.
>>223601730Okay Mike. Enjoy your Star Trek slop.
>>223601730>You're free to cope by calling me "mike" at your leisure, but deep down, you know you're low IQ, and know you're a moron with no leg to stand on.Cry more Mike
>>223600540>impressive special effects for their time
>>223602695Meanwhile other movies at the time looked like this.
>>223598590Mike didn't understand the prequels. He couldn't process it then and he refuses to even try. For example, defeating Watto in ep 1 is a direct parallel to the Emperor's defeat in ep 6. It's another facet of Lucas's mirroring/rhyming theme. Little Ani, together with the help of a Jedi, defeat villainous Watto, because Qui-Gon bet on Anakin's victory. Come around to ep 6, Luke is betting everything on Vader seeing the light, remembering who he really is, to defeat Palpatine. In this scenario, Luke is like Qui-Gon. Furthermore, Anakin's scenes that we see in the prequels are the memories that Vader is recalling during the events of OT. He finally recalls Qui-Gons lesson, that the gambler can lose just like that. That was the hidden lesson that got lost, went over Anakin's head, as he was so enthralled in being the little boy wonder kickin ass. Qui-Gon was Anakin's father figure for a brief time but the influence was monumental. Also recall that Qui-Gon was a true believer in Anakin being the Chosen One, and partly due to his faith in Anakin, the prophecy was ultimately fulfilled. The Emperor placed his bet on Vader staying a bitch, but whenever you gamble, my friend, eventually you'll lose. All this goes over Mike's head. Beautiful story.
>>223602790LOTR came out around the same time and looked a million times better.
>>223602833LOTR was able to mix in real sets and locations while Star Wars is set in a fantastical science fiction world that can't film on location the same way.
>>223602887
>>223600540Don't even bother with the prequel hating NPC crowd>>223601023I saw them in my early 20s and still enjoyed them. They are flawed movies but still great. We will never see anything like the PT ever again.
>>223602887>can't film on location the same way>the location needed: a big hall
>>223598590it's true. never once heard an argument from a prequelfag that wasn't basically one of the following:> "NUH UH, HE'S JUST A BITTER MILLENIAL/BOOMER PREQUELS GOOD BECUZ THEY ARE" (never correctly states gen x)> "BUT SEQUELS SO BAD!!"> "HAHA NORMIES LIKE MEME SO THIS MEANS PREQUELS WIN!"
>>223603410See >>223600540
why didn’t Disney hire Shatner to direct TLJ like Plinkett wanted
