[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Header.png (705 KB, 991x657)
705 KB PNG
https://variety.com/2026/film/global/the-beatles-films-producer-on-releasing-four-movies-at-once-1236909058/

Which one will flop the hardest, and why is it Ringo's?
>>
Who gives a nigger shit.
>>
>>223722182
why the fuck would you ever consider doing this

remember when kiss tried to put out 4 solo albums at once and they all flopped hard
>>
>>223722199
We get to see Anna Sawai's tits, so there's that.
>>
>>223722199
This. Beatles are cringe boomer shit.
>>
you MIGHT have gotten this to sell in the 60's or the 70's but not now
one film about all of them would have been fine and covered it just fine, why is this even necessary
>>
Truly a legendarily awful idea
>>
This will be bigger than Barbenheimer
>>
>>223722239
There hoping it will be a global viral trend or some shit
>Did you do the 4 movie challenge?
>Which was your favorite, only vote if you've seen all 4 films
>Who else saw all 3 movies in one day at your local AMC
Etc
>>
>>223722182
>All four 'Beatles' biopics will be released simultaneously on April 7, 2028

It's been like 10 fucking years since they started making these movies.
>>
File: ClipboardImage.jpg (180 KB, 1200x900)
180 KB JPG
>>223722400
check'd; they DO realize these fucking tickets are like $20 a piece, yes, nobody spending fucking $80 on this shit
>>
who the fuck wants to see a ringo biopic lol
>>
>>223722204

Yeah but other Ace Frehley, Kiss suck and are terrible musicians.
>>
>>223722239
>one film about all of them would have been fine and covered it just fine, why is this even necessary

It would be better as a tv series with each episode centered around one of The Beatles.
>>
>>223722465
yeah, but, I completely agree
>>
and still no hitler biopic
>>
>>223722487
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
anything but expecting this shit to do anything but hugely backfire, who is going to go to any of them but John's for the price, and even then just the audacity of trying to make you spend all that money to see all 4 of them is going to be a huge turn off
>>
>>223722400
This, they're going for Barbenheimer 2.0, only totally inorganic
>>
>>223722492
Someone will make it with AI eventually, and it's going to be kino
>>
>>223722199
>Woman Is The Nigger of the World.
>>
>>223722507

I'll watch all the flicks but I ain't paying for any of them.

Also, after watching the 900 hour long "Get Back" documentary Peter Jackson, (didn't pay for that either) it's obvious that The Beatles were just Paul McCartney's backing band.
>>
>>223722182
will this go down as the worst entertainment business decision of the 21st century?
>>
>>223722616
>make 4 films for the cost of 1.5
who knows
>>
>>223722597
>after watching the 900 hour long "Get Back" documentary
thank you for reminding me I've never watched that
by that time John was mostly checked out but you can't discount John, Paul's shit on his own is always so saccharine your teeth hurt
>>
>>223722182
I want to watch them all in a marathon but I don't want to go to a theater to do so
>>
he's a really good musician but a shit lyricist most of the time, some exceptions aside
>>
Can't wait for the scene where three of the beatles masturbate together when they are young
>>
The only beatles I care about are paul and george
>>
>>223722584
You know now that I think about it that makes a lot of sense. Even in countries where there no niggers there are still women impulsively committing violent crimes against vulnerable groups.
>>
>>223722657
wonder if they'll touch John & Eppy's "vacation"
>>
File: Brian-Epstein-.jpg (53 KB, 1000x1177)
53 KB JPG
real interesting and timely surname
>>
damned if there isn't somewhat of a familial resemblance too now that I'm looking
>>
File: George won.png (301 KB, 713x697)
301 KB PNG
>>223722597
Poor Paul lived to see Here Comes the Sun become far and away the most popular Beatles song.
>>
>>223722446
I live in New York and regular tickets are about $16. Is this bullshit averaging in the retarded RPX and other overpriced shit only dumb fucks pay for?
>>
File: IMG_2464.jpg (309 KB, 807x2044)
309 KB JPG
>>223722182
Yall know theres a comic called the fifth Beatle

Its boring as fuck

Dont read it
>>
>>223722514
Barbenheimer itself was completely inorganic you fucking mong
We were meant to be the chosen generation, immune to propaganda but instead we fell for this bullshit glowie forced meme
>>
>>223722738
that art looks great at least
>>
>>223722182
Who will they find with a flat enough ass to play yoko ono?
>>
>>223722670
>>223722691
>>223722702
>>223722738
Qrd?
>>
>>223722182
>>BOOMER SLOP
the Beatles had one decent song but it was full of propaganda, you know the one, that lower than whores love sing for social media clout and get movie roles
>>
File: check 'em.jpg (54 KB, 492x492)
54 KB JPG
>Pay full price to see John Lennon's biopic
>It ends midway through
>>
>>223722182
I love the Beatles and even I don't care about this. There's already so much Beatles media, I really doubt these movies will have anything interesting to say or will say it in an interesting way. I'd watch another 8 hours of Get Back in a heartbeat, but I probably won't even see a single one of these. Might pirate the Ringo one just for a laugh. I don't know, I don't really get who they're for. Normies don't care about the Beatles anymore, and Beatles fans have way more interesting content available.
>>
>>223722729
generic search result frendo

>>223722762
the 'fifth beatle' was the producer George Martin, that wrote a bunch of stuff like the orchestral parts and directed things, unrelated to Brian Epstein
Epstein was their original manager and in love with John, the reason he did it
also the reason they got famous, since he would go around buying up all the copies of their singles to get them on the sales charts
him & John took this vacation together and supposedly slept together
he ended up mismanaging the fuck out of their licensing, costing them like several hundred million dollars, in the 60's; they fired him, he killed himself
>>
>2030
>/tv/ house
>"I don't know man I feel like The Wings spin-off easily BTFOs Ringo 2. Ringo 2 is the worst in the BCU"
>>
>>223722876
lol
>>
>>223722876
Ringo 3 is gonna be kino though, it's gonna cover his alcoholic years. people are finally gonna learn who the real wife beater in the Beatles was.
>>
this would have been better off as a series with 12 episodes
>>
I'm still so confused how they time these types of things.
There never seems any rhyme or reason to when they decide on it.
>>
>>223722907
I heard there's a Yoko after credit scene
>>
No person in this world can blackpill you about the beatles as much as a beatles shill. The more obsessed on making you like them, the blackest the pill.
https://youtu.be/tE85_cUIGxY?feature=shared
>>
>>223723307
nobody said you have to like them, the shit is ancient
>>
File: linda mccartney.jpg (35 KB, 387x516)
35 KB JPG
>>223722597
Wings were Linda McCartney's backing band
>>
>>223723307
makes me want to kill myself like that breaking bad actor just did
>>
>>223722738
He'll never be Pete Best



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.