>>223740672
We are long do a remake 60 years ago

>>223740695
I don't think there are any current actresses who wouldn't look ugly by comparison

File: j fonda.jpg (2.86 MB, 2936x2896)

2.86 MB JPG

>>223740672
>>223740689
For me, it was the time her butt and Biel's touched.

>>223740695
>long do
that's DUE, guppy. And no we are not for
>>223740724
Sydney Sweeney is currently producing a remake with EDGAR WRIGHT. IF IT EVEN BEGINS FILMING, I WILL BLOW UP THE PLANET

>>223741302
>Sydney Sweeney
meh, I don't really like her face. It'll be a notable downgrade from Jane Fonda

>>223740695
Pervy 50s and 60s movies were a product of their time where sexuality was something kept hidden and porn wasn't easily accessible. You just don't get that same feeling nowadays. Beyond that people would expect a remake to be super serious instead of just a bunch of silly nonsense.

Attention, posters from India:
The actual movie is a piece of shit, and we have plenty of things to jerk off to now

>>223741302
>Sydney Sweeney is currently producing a remake with EDGAR WRIGHT. IF IT EVEN BEGINS FILMING, I WILL BLOW UP THE PLANET
Why? Sydney is hot and unlike Jane, she's based.

>>223742075
chuddette loses the face card matchup bigtime

>>223742075
This. Jane is the Ms Rachel of Vietnam.