Anybody else getting tired of the constant LGBT propaganda from Hollywood? I have nothing against gay people, but they don't need to be forced into every tv show and movie.
>>223742330there are too many libtard faggot writers
>>223742330this is historically accurate
>>223742330Lesbians shouldve remained a marketing gimmick for movies and not become a real thing because lesbians are either fucking ugly or annoying
>>223742330Tv and movies are for gay retarded normalniggers. Maybe pick a different activity if you dont want gay shit.
>>223742330>I have nothing against gay people>But also I get triggered every single time I see gay people
>>223742432there's a difference between seeing gay people IRL and seeing straight actors make out with the same sex on literally every single piece of media. the first is natural, the second is not.
i dont even give a shit if a girl fucks another girl, it doesnt even count to me. a lot of the best sex ive had has been with lesbians, because unlocking their inner breeding fetish is basically like breaking a crazy wild horse so the sex is basically unrivaled
Oh no hot lesbians making out, how terrible.
>>223742419Lesbians might not really exist. Over a 10 year period, they show a 47% rate of not identifying as lesbians anymore. This doesn't include the possibility that the 53% might have flipped back and forth to their original positions and won't flip again. Compare this to the number for gay males which is over 90% consistently identifying as gay over long periods of time, and its clear that Lesbians are much more likely to have sex with men than Gays are to have sex with women.
>>223742330dunno it's not like I've got much to live for beyond whining about it on /tv/
>>223742330They look good here but kinda weird out of costume. Just not what you picture when you think pretty white girl
>>223742419Every lesbian I've met irl has been either ridiculously ugly and if not usually they are a junkie or mentally ill.
>>223742330Lesbian historical dramas are so fucking boring. Also they hate nude scenes because muh male gaze so there’s no real pay off
>>223742506Lesbians are long term just bad for one another, it's just biology women need men and men need women to coexist in a healthy relationship.
I have antiwoke fatigue
>>223742419Lesbians are actually just confused tomboys
>>223742587Lesbians aren't tomboys.They're pyrite compared to Gold Tomboys have to be straight because they not only do guys stuff but they enjoy being with guys. Lesbians hate men and are a fucked up unhealthy cope that tries to larp as them.
>>223742632Lesbians don’t hate men usually. They barely think about men actually
>>223742632Lesbians aren’t real
>>223742330I don't remember when I last saw a fag character in a big Hollyjew movie. I guess they cast that tranny for Blade Runner TV series, but everyone knows it's dead on arrival anyway, including the industry.
>>223742661cope, often times they're very bitter to men and they think of men constantly because statistically they love cheating on each other with dudes.
>>223742330I know what you mean. Best you can do is stop making threads, stop giving these DEI movies attention and stop talking/thinking about them. The good gays are embarrassed by these slop movies
>>223742587>So many pretty ladies >They'll never accept my mediocre HAPA penis because they'd rather pretend they enjoy munching carpetI fucking hate Israel
>>223742432Why do you need to be everywhere?Do you understand that you're actually a tiny minority?Do you understand that seeing your kind constantly in the is the same thing as if every show and commercial had to have at least one pair of midget cast members in it and has to specifically set aside time in the plot for a midget romance?Do you genuinely not see how people might start rolling their eyes when the mandatory perfect midget who's so witty and quirky shows up on screen constantly?
>>223742505Lesbians aren't hot.Girls kissing isn't sexy You've been brainwashed by generations of Hollywood propaganda telling you that girls kissing is sexy.
>>223742723Just go feminine pretty boy (not gay), apparently masculine/lesbo girls love the counter traits in those types of men
>>223742586>The constant barrage of faggot propaganda in every aspect of media isn't tiring>It's the minority conservatives (since most accept faggotry) that's tiringWhat's with libtards needing every single person on the planet to parrot their viewpoints? I thought they were all about diversity.
>>223742782>What's with libtards needing every single person on the planet to parrot their viewpoints?probably bullshit, I mean it's not like anyone wants you on their side bruh
>>223742330>2026>still paying attentionhollywood will make a $500 million film about coprophagia if you let themhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XOB5syfDOB0&ra=m
>>223742506I assure you they do.
>>223742587The combination of masculinity with femininity is very hot. Godspeed masc lesbians.
>>223742794>I mean it's not like anyone wants you on their side bruhOk and? Faggotry is still gross.
>>223742330You know you just make yourself sound turbogay by saying you don't like seeing two cute girls kissing, right?
>>223742587Finally, a biker bar I can feel safe as an hetero man!
>>223742872Buy an ad
Lesbians aren't real. Only men can be gay. For example, OP.
>>223743066>Being gay is good>Also I will use it as a disparaging insultGays always talk about straight insecurity, but the moment they come across a faggot disliker suddenly they project all this sexual insecurity onto them. Why can't you just let people live with their preferences?
it's okay if it's lesbians cause that's hot
>>223743124>"No End In Sight", Researchers Say
>>223743137>Why can't you just let people live with their preferences?Why can't you? Clearly it's a big problem for you that some people prefer their own gender.
>>223743216Who says that I don't? I simply just don't like having faggotry shoved down my throat at every opportunity. I don't fly straight pride flags. I'm not ideologically driven to include straight romances simply for the sake of having them in television, film, and other forms of media. I don't make kissing a woman as a man a political statement, because I'm not an insufferable, attention-seeking faggot
>>223742747Why do you see them everywhere? Do you see them in your dreams and alphabet soup too? The only time I ever learn about gays, lesbians, or trans in things is when /tvpol/ rushes over to shove it in my face.
>>223742330Tranny Jannies are on the loose and being colossal faggots about pointing out the truth about how their tribe loves to rape kids. And are deleting comments on TCAP threads on /tv/ and banning users. These same janniefags are assblasted by the truth. I believe there is a substantial amount of jewish russian agents that have infiltrated the moderation team of this site. These same homosexuals frequently ban users for pointing out the truth about jews, slavs, russians, russian, and israel. The beatings will continue despite your bans. As long as these pedos keep throwing bans at me I will continue to make them suck my dick and eat my shit. I will accept your full surrender given the following conditions:1)you make a new thread apologizing for being such bottom faggot shitters2)beg for my forgiveness and remove all bans3) denounce the Torah and your satanic religion 4) declare israel an illegitimate country and a threat to modern society and national sovereignty of better nations5) pin it to every board on this siteI will rape you disgusting JIDF kikes until you faggots love me. You track suit wearing white orc commie faggots will rue the day. Your attempts to further ban me only greater embolden me. When I am done you hooked nose desert niggers will be left face down with your bloody gapping assholes pointing upwards for all to see. My victory is inevitable. Continuing to stack bans will only prolong how long this continues.
>>223742330Fuck yeah , is tiresome to see always ,for no fucking reason,a fucking lgbbtq+,5.0zyx fucker in a movie,tv series, game, comic book, music, now even in religion you see one or two, goddammit
>>223743304Good for you, but not liking two cute girls kissing still makes you a faggot.
>>223742330I thought I'd check out Downton Abbey yesterday and in the very first episode I see Daredevil sodomizing a butler.
>>223742432This >>223742330>>223742485>literally every single piece of mediaDude, you sound like a total psychopath
>>223743332What I got from this interaction is that homosexuals are completely irredeemable. They all seem to possess the same personality ailments that makes them insufferable.
>>223742330>Why is propaganda shoved into every piece of media?!?! Propaganda doesn’t need to be EVERYWHERE!!!!!!
>>223742330>2026>voluntarily watching jewish pozzed shitit's a (You) problem, OP
>>223742330yes, glad I haven't paid a cent for their content.
>>223743393I don't think anyone in that interaction is an actual homosexual.
>>223742587if bitches wanna be so masculine they should just beat me up and rape me
>>223742330Feels like every new horror movie aimed at young adults has some kind of lesbian relationship.
>>223743632I wasn't trying to imply that. I just decided to ignore the conversation and reaffirm the stance I had before I opened the thread by posting it under the guise of a resolution.
>>223743332>GIRLS KISSING?! AWESOME!!!!This is some middle schooler shit
I have lesbian fatigue.
>>223743322Just so you know, media matters is a neo lib “watch dog” org ran by david brock, who you might also know as the gay lover pizzagate’s own james alefantis. You’re citing blatant propaganda.
>>223742762>Guy with vagina envyWhat a time to be alive!
I love watching chuds seethe impotently at the world.
>>223743336>Daredevil sodomizing a butler.The butler was with The Red Hand.
>>223744153It's neat how you can't pretend to be normal for a single post.
>>223742419Its talmudic divide and conquer. Many young women nowadays identify as bi and are openly misandrist. “Sapphic” queer relationships are glorified in the media and heterosexuality is viewed as lame.
>>223742762I've been jerking off to lesbian porn since the 90s and I'm not gonna stop now just because incels have decided it's an evil jewish agenda or something.
>>223742330Every show? Every movie?
>>223742381this. unfortunately.
>>223744212you seethe at happy people who have children
>>223742485>DUDE! HOW CAN STRAIGHT PEOPLE ACT IN A FICTIONAL STORY THAT THEY ARE GAY?!?&?!!’b
>>223742330girl on girl is ok because it's hot but they've been slipping in more and more actual faggotry with 2 niggas
>>223742747They aren’t everywhere. I think it says more about your life if all you see is gays
>>223744302>g as nurglejej
It's not enough if anything. We need more lesbian noir, mystery movies.
>>223744212Says the troon seething impotently at never being a woman.CHUD = Chad Heroically Undoing Degeneracy
>>223742918Not in the same sense as gay men as plenty of lesbians have sex with men while gay men don't have sex with women.
>>223742330looks pretty hot though
>>223742330>Anybody else getting tired of the constant LGBT propaganda from Hollywood?Yeah, like anyone normal everywhere.Gayshit = no watch/play/read
>>223744980There are more strictly gay men than women, but the latter still exist. It gets confused because "lesbians" will call themselves that out of convenience, when really they're bi.
>>223742330>they don't need to be forced into every tv show and movieThe majority of characters in all media are straight. Even if only 5% of people are gay they still deserve to be seen on-screen and some content should really focus just on them. I've watched enough gay characters to not even really notice them, maybe that's the point. it normalises what is normal.
>>223745046This is such a generic liberal post from circa 2014 that it must be a troll. /tv/ is stupid enough to take this at face value tho.
No, also sexual minorities are more normal than chuds, so I'd rather look at them than read some schizo nonsense posted by low IQ rightoids (and they now took over most social media). I'm genuinely glad that movies remained liberal.
>>223745046Oh another social planer...Stories don't have to exist to serve social cohesion. Authors shouldn't be forced to represent every possible minority in society just because some progessive ideologue decided it's the right thing to do. I swear you people are intent on bringing about a dystopian future. Your type exists in every generation, just with a differently colored hat.
I don't care if characters are gay. I only get bothered when that's all they are and it's used as a thinly-veiled machination to bash men.
>>223745122Agreed. Men-bashing should be at the forefront. Don't be cowards.
>>223745134I unronically respect vitriolic manhaters more than those who hate men but pretend they don't. Obviously I disagree with them but at least they give you the courtesy of not presuming you're so fucking dumb you can't see through their charade.
>>223745108>Authors shouldn't be forcedthey aren't
>>223742381>there are too many libtard faggot writersToo many words.
>>223745174They are if, for example, all streaming platforms enact DEI content and hiring policies
>>223745191Makes you wonder why majority of movies still aren't about LGBT. It's almost like it's not as bad as you schizos claim.
>>223745211They all have some characters and plot lines forced in based on quotas. Except the ones that are for a Chinese audience.
>>223745219Then make your own movies if all modern ones are bad. You would find wokeness in 1920s silent cinema, this is how obsessed you are.
>>223745032Thats the thing- if only 47% of Lesbians identify as such after ten years, how many of those 47 flipped to non-lesbian then back to lesbian in a span of ten years and for that matter how many of the 47 will proceed to not identify as a lesbian at any later point of their lives?As far as bi women are concerned its only a social thing because straight and bi women have the same sexual responses. So either the vast majority of women are bi or female sexuality is not concrete.
>>223745229There is "wokeness" if the director is/was "woke". The era doesn't matter.
>>223745268Then maybe cinema isn't a good medium for you? It's been heavily left-leaning since its inception.
>>223745219Yeah I can’t stand how they keep shoving white men into everything
>>223745312Shitlibs love calling out racism and sexism, looking for it just to point it all out. I like to dig through wokism and point it all out.
>>223743216Stay in your niche shit product and all will be fine.The problem is that you can't stand not rubbing your fetishes in normal people's faces
>>223744212>furiously typed the subnormal while seething at normality and normal people
>>223745089Mentally ill post.Go be subnormal in your bubble
>>223745229Fuck off from our entertainment industry and normal people will make actual movies once again, invader>>223745312>things that never happenedyou are mentally ill
>>223745255Labels mean different things to different people. There are a lot of women who adopt the lesbian label even if they have some attraction to men either because they only date women, or they greatly prefer women. Some lesbians take great issue with this because of the perception it can create. In my view, it is not so much a question of attractions changing, as it is about how people label their attractions. 53% of self-ID'd lesbians changing what they call themselves, doesn't mean their attractions changed, or that the attractions of the other 47% will change. It seems likely to me that the 47% are simply more strongly on the gay side of the spectrum, and therefore less likely to change labels in the future.>As far as bi women are concerned its only a social thing because straight and bi women have the same sexual responsesHave you considered that those sexual responses don't correspond perfectly to sexual orientation? You are assuming that straight women are simply in denial or lying about their reported attractions, which is a massive leap. I note that you leave out lesbian women - I looked it up and it turns out they have more exclusive patterns of arousal (women). Interesting omission...
>>223742330I refuse to watch anything with faggotry in it. If a faggot scene comes up I just shut it down.
>>223745512>Have you considered that those sexual responses don't correspond perfectly to sexual orientation?They seem to correspond perfectly to sexual orientation in males. The simplest solution is that women simply aren't sexual in the way men are sexual. Men get turned on, women don't, for women it is more of an emotional state of mind.>You are assuming that straight women are simply in denial or lying about their reported attractions, which is a massive leap.No, I am saying that women who consider themselves to be straight have the same sexual tendencies as women who consider themselves to be bisexual.>I note that you leave out lesbian women - I looked it up and it turns out they have more exclusive patterns of arousal (women). Interesting omission...Not an ommission, I brought up point number two to illustrate that straight and bisexual women are generally indistinguishable as an argument for the fluidity of female sexual orientation. To prove my honesty- I will add something that you haven't said about lesbians- their arousal patterns slightly more male oriented than that of non-lesbians which is to say they they seem to have some physiological response to arousal. On the other hand, gay male arousal patterns are the same physiological responses as straight male patters with only the target of arousal differing.Additionally what does it mean if 53% of the group that shows a distinct physiological and sexual clustering decides to no longer identify as their group ten years down the line? It means that female sexuality is thoroughly fluid, and whatever it was that made lesbians what they are (likely excessive testosterone flushing when they were fetuses) doesn't make the kind of permanent changes to their brain the way the mechanism that makes gay men what they are (likely the mother's immune system destroying specifically testosterone receptors in the male fetus brains).
>>223745395Nice projecting.
>>223745738>The simplest solution is that women simply aren't sexual in the way men are sexualSure. There are differences in how men and women experience arousal.>women who consider themselves to be straight have the same sexual tendencies as women who consider themselves to be bisexualWell, no. They showed similar patterns of sexual arousal (genital vasocongestion). What doesn't follow is that both straight and bisexual women are attracted to both sexes. You're conflating those two things. There are many possible reasons why a straight woman may become physically aroused at the sight of naked women, whilst not being attracted to them. As you say, men and women are different sexually.>It means that female sexuality is thoroughly fluidAs explained above, no it doesn't. All you can glean from that with confidence is that sexual identity is fluid, which isn't the same thing. I suspect if you were to ask that 53%, a lot of them would admit to having had some attraction to men whilst they identified as lesbian. This is common even today. It does not necessarily imply a change in orientation.
>>223746289>Well, no. They showed similar patterns of sexual arousal (genital vasocongestion). What doesn't follow is that both straight and bisexual women are attracted to both sexes. You're conflating those two things.Essentially what the data indicate is that female sexual identification in the straight vs bisexual distinction is not a difference of sexuality, but identity. >As explained above, no it doesn't.Yes it does when so many supposedly homosexual women no longer identify as homosexual over time. BTW that number is way higher for bisexual identifying women. > All you can glean from that with confidence is that sexual identity is fluid, which isn't the same thing.When it comes to women in general, these are very similar, and if you exclude lesbians, these are essentially the same thing. Even among lesbians, there is plenty of fluidity. None of this fluidity is characteristics of either straight or gay males.>I suspect if you were to ask that 53%, a lot of them would admit to having had some attraction to men whilst they identified as lesbian.This essentialist view of sexuality only tracks with males, not females; be it arousal data or long term retention of sexual orientation, women are more fluid then men. Gays are more permanent than Lesbians.
>>223746370>what the data indicate is that female sexual identification in the straight vs bisexual distinction is not a difference of sexuality, but identity.That is your interpretation of the data, which for reasons I have outlined, I am extremely sceptical of. Dismiss self-reported attraction at your peril. Just gonna have to agree to disagree my friend.
>>223745780>nonsequiturqed
>>223742587>Hates men>Tries so hard to look and act like one Many such cases
>>223742330I don't see any of this stuff because I don't seek it out. Nobody is forcing you to watch anything. You're being extremely lazy because you can't be bothered to choose the shit you watch better.
