Is this the most iconic cinema shot of the 21st century?
Either it is or it isn’t. Those are 50/50 odds
>>223878524the math adds up, flippy bippy
>>223878482Not even in the online chud circles of 4chan and reddit where this flick is lauded over is it the most iconic. Even the obsession face bitch is more iconic
>>223878690Name a more iconic shot then >obsessionRecent popular things are excluded by definition, otherwise you could always point to "current popular movie shot"
>>223878690> Even the obsession face bitch is more iconicEh, the same movie that paid homage the iconic scene?
>>223878913BTFO 'im
I’m not joking. Easiest test is to show people the shot and then ask them to name the movie. Way more people could answer “The Room” to this than could name Obsession or Blade Runner. Plus it’s 23 years old now whereas Obsession might be irrelevant in five.
>>223880052I thought this movie's title was Lisa
>>223878482>Is this the most iconic cinema shot of the 21st century?
>>223878482No. Just because you watch it once a week and simp over Ana de Armas doesn't mean it has had a huge cultural impact.It's a good film though
Heat Legend hanging out of car window obviously
>>223880172You’re an idiot. The scene had so many parodies and artistic renderings. Everyone knows this scene or has scene pictures of it
>>223878482To this day, I have never watched a movie with Ryan Gosling. Also>iconicHow's that reaction channel going?
>>223880135If Tom Cruise agreed to be in it, it must be pretty grand.
>>223880052I think some of you retards don't understand what iconic meansIconic does NOT mean you have to recognize the movie the scene is from, just recognize the scene itself thinking "hey I've seen this/a variation of this"It's basically a meme before memes were a thing
>>223880382But I DID have breakfast this morning, and it was a red apple that I can see clearly in my mind.
>movie is borrowed from an older movie with the exact same premise/concept>groundbreaking and iconic, never seen beforedo you hear yourself?
>>223878690Every year BR2049 stays culturally relevant, 10 years almost noe and still arguably one of the only movies of the past decade to retain any cultural significance for that long. Youll still be seething about it 10 years from now too, isnt that amazing?
>>223878482Nope. This film actually tanked massively and not a lot of people saw it, therefore, not iconic in the slightest. Obsession bitch, Chigur in the convenience store, Joker crashing the mob boss meeting. We could be here all day listing actual iconic shots.>>223878913We must be talking about a different obsession. Do you have a link to the homage so I can see?
>>223880250Yea no>>223880202Compared to OP this is way more iconic
>>223880438I like iconic retro kino oldschool classic hidden gems of yesteryear that make me feel nostalgic and comfy.
>>223880454That’s fine. I just don’t really care is all
>>223878482
>>223880433I've literally never seen this shot>>223880202At least post the shot retard, but yeah I agree solid contender against OP
>>223880480That's because you're a secondary pseud goyslop golem pajeet shill consoomer paypig with buyer's remorse and sunk cost fallacy.
The problem for film today is the same as that for painting when photography was invented.
>>223880546I don’t know man seems people really drawn the line with AI
>>223880500The dark knight has at least 5 shots way more iconic than OP please be serious
>>223880572It's not up to people. It's up to time, which only goes in the forward direction.
>>223880597Surely you can show one more then
>>223880500>I've literally never seen this shotNot surprised considering by the rest of your post
>>223880546The world no longer produces Claude Monets.
>>223880501Lots of buzzwords you got there you empty shell of a human
>>223878482What movie?
>>223878690That's a normie meme
>>223881089You haven't seen Blade Runner 2049?
>>223881194Only the first one.
>>223881078And none of them are gayer than saying "iconic."
>>223881210It's worth a watch.
>>223881231True but I’m not gay ass OP
>>223881551Well, considering there's only two people in this thread, me and /tv/, I think you are.
>>223881715
>>223878482The epitome of dishonest slop
>>223880572Because many other inventions seem to at least hold some form of direct intervention into them. While genAI has a layer to it that heavily divides the input from the output.>>223880611There's been cases of technologies that were overhyped at their time but ended up getting forgotten. I'm not saying that GenAI is one of them, but not everything just gets accepted simply because enough time has passed. Promising advancements such as nuclear energy have stagnated because of fear-mongering caused by Chernobyl.
>>223881852Maybe. I think people are cool when technology stays in its lane but draw the line when starts getting into human stuff such AI is doing.
>>223878482can we even call something this edited the shot? the real shot, as the camera saw it, was nothing special.
>>223880429Doesn't matter that Blade Runner 2049 flopped. A smaller but more influential audience of people saw it and are majorly influenced by it. It will rightfully be seen as a significant film just like the first one
>>223882522First Blade Runner was a bomb in theaters and same thing happened. Gained a cult audience
>>223880625I'll list a couple more:Walking away from the blowing up hospitalCash pile
>>223882597>magic trick>truck flipping>bending the AK barrel
>>223882522>A smaller but more influential audience of people saw itYou mean the nerd losers who make watching slop a part of their personality liking it makes it’s significant? Lol I love the irony though
>>223882718You’re a stupid faggot. There are lots of movies still talked about today that were bombs in theater. Wizard of Oz. It’s a wonderful life. Fight club. Mose John Carpenter movies.
>>223882772Yea because those are legitimately good and not literally me walmart sci fi for dummies. Although the first one was a deserved classic cause Ridley Scott when he cared about visuals and mood was a good director
>>223878482I guess it's appropriate that a cgi scene defines this bland era of filmmaking
>>223878482No, but this one is.
>>223882858Blade Runner is not sci fi. It’s neo noir.
>>223878482lollmao even
>>223882976The Expanse is not sci fi. It’s neo noir
>>223883076You’re stupid. Blade Runner is neo noir. It follows same theme. Lone detective in west coast city usually narrating and almost all at night.
>>223880398what kind of freak eats a red apple
>>223883235Shut the fuck up nerd
>>223883298Red Delicious are the nasty ones; but you have Fuji, Honeycrisp, Cosmic Crisp, Pink Lady, Cripps' Pink, Galas, and others that are good.
>>223883076Orange is the neo noir.
>>223882550Yeah, but the first Blade Runner was actually good.
>>223882597>>223882678Most iconic shot is picAlthough dunnhier is close 2nd these days
Not even the best shot of the movie, that belongs to the overhead shot of K bleeding out on the snowy steps
>>223885470
>>223882993Literally never seen this shot >>223882878At least this one is also a valid contender, although for all the wrong reasons kek
>>223878739>Name a more iconic shotYou rang?
>>223886418What movie?
>>223886444 (Checked)Bane Rises
>>223886418This is only iconic on /tv/, nobody else knows about this shot
>>223886544Kek just like the slop shot in OP
>>223887160Nah, it went way beyond 4chan culture.
zoomies be str8 up gl8zin on BR49 no cap uncs u got me trippin
The obvious choice for something that isn't #1 but is at least better than this shit movie is Captain America holding the hammer in Endgame
>>223887211Cringe
>>223885500Unironically the most beautyfully shot scene ever.
