Shane didn't take the Saudi money he's cool

>>223887556
>remember that thing that happened? well it turns out it didn't happen and the opposite happened
why do people keep doing this and why do people believe it

>>223887583
Something something left-wing discourse something something pretending not to understand.

>>223887583
Mark Twain dedicated his life to exploring this question.

>>223887556
He said at the gym and look at him. The joke practically writes itself and they didn't even bother.

>>223887612
really? what book or books?

>alternating caps
>censoring fuck and whore
The arbiter of correct humor right here

>>223887613
That was the joke you fucking retard. His joke was he hadn’t been to the gym in so long that he didn’t realize the women just dress like whores now, which they have been doing for 15 years at this point

>>223887612
>>223887624
Nietzsche speaks of this.

>>223887583
The group chat/bluesky feed needs content, doesn't really matter how you get it. Obviously the right does the same thing.

>>223887556
donald trump is a weak woke pussy who loves libtards controlling the media

File: 1792154888541254.jpg (110 KB, 640x640)

110 KB JPG

>>223887556

>>223887647
No he doesn't, have you even read his books?

>>223887556
please a skilled autismo find out this artist's kike name. please

>>223887772
nypa

>>223887583
>Nooooo everyone loved Shane’s joke!!!

>>223887632
And how is any part of that supposed to be funny?

>>223887855
>Nooooo everyone loved Shane’s joke!!!
Correct. The Live Audience laughed. Normal people laughed. Literally the only people uppity over it are feminist queers & hamplanets and their creepy rat-men cheerleaders on social-media.

File: images.jpg (29 KB, 689x290)

29 KB JPG

>>223887855
>why is that funny??? explain humor to me!

>>223887695
To tell the truth, I have never read either Nietzsche or Twain.

>>223887966
kek

I didnt think it was very funny
It wasnt even edgy
Is it a little bit edgy saying whore?
Maybe
Other than that it was nothing special
I did think it was funny when he was miming the way he would look in all those tik-tok videos that women film of men staring at them in the background
Other than that it was meh

>>223887556
does this mean women are winning?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA&ra=m

>>223887556
I've literally never even heard of this guy before he was in SNL...

What I don't get is why he even went back on SNL again? Going back one time to do a victory lap after getting fired was kino. But going back a second time was basically tempting fate. The audience and cast all hate him. He was begging for something bad to happen.

I laughed really hard when Shane spoke about his Down's syndrome uncle who sneaks homemade grilled cheese sandwiches into restaurants

>>223888023
pretty sure he's like the biggest comedian in the world right now. i dont even like comedians and i've heard of him many times

>>223888031
I think if you're allowed on SNL, you're doing something wrong. It would be a good business decision to get kicked off

File: Schaub.webm (1.82 MB, 1280x720)

1.82 MB WEBM

>>223888069
>pretty sure he's like the biggest comedian in the world right now
I believe you are forgetting about a certain someone

>>223888069
Man standup really is in a sad state

literally not what happened. the set got decent laughs.

>>223888031
He’s hosted three times

>>223888087
DICEY DICEY

>>223887556
Saying “it’s over” for Shane Gillis doesn’t make sense to me, because most people that watch SNL are already left-leaning, so it’s not like he’d be losing fans.

He was already known as a Rogan-related comedian before this controversy, so his brand / reputation is unlikely to change because of this.

I don’t even find the joke (or him in general) funny, but the outrage at it isn’t going to achieve anything

File: 53454353.png (814 KB, 977x938)

814 KB PNG

>>223887556
tldr, saar

>>223888104
Okay well my point still stands. Any other job if you got fired and then made it; you go back exactly once to rub it in everyones faces and that's it. Most people never get the chance to even do that once in their life. So if you get it you have to take it.

But you also have to recognize it's something you do once and never again. You don't make it an annual thing. Going back to the job you got fired from where everyone hates you and gloat about doing better than everyone else every 12 months. There's nothing good that can come from that. It's totally insane to me. Like I said absolutely begging the universe to fuck your shit up.

>>223887556
i read that comic in his voice and it sounded like something he'd say to make the audience more uncomfortable
funny

When did comedians stop telling jokes. Going to comedy shows just seems like a miserable experience

>>223887583
>why do people keep doing this
Taking an inconvenient reality and writing over it with a fictitious but more palatable narrative, and then simply pretending that it's real, is a time-honored leftist tradition.

>and why do people believe it
The only people who believe it fall into two categories: Leftists, and the people they have duped.
Leftists believe in the fictitious but more palatable narrative of events, obviously, becsuse it's psychologically and emotionally more palatable to them, not to mention more advantageous for whatever agenda they're pushing. Although you could alternatively argue that they DON'T genuinely "believe" in the revised narrative being actual reality; that they instead know in their heart that it's false, but say and behave otherwise, for their own personal advantage and their collective advantage.
The other group, the people they have duped, are normal people that have been deceived into believing a falsehood that the leftists are pushing in one way or another. One reason they end up believing that narrative is because it's the only narrative they get exposed to, as a consequence of the near monopoly that leftist ideology has on not just mass-media but communications in general (most social-media platforms, etc.). Another reason is, instead, that they refuse to believe that "so many people", i.e. leftists, WOULD ALL just straight-up lie to their face about factual and often documented & provable events that did or did not happen. This is what we commonly refer to as "gaslighting": A strategy for convincing others of a lie based on simply confidently and incessantly pushing it & repeating it. I.e. the "Repeat the Big Lie enough times and it will convince people it's the truth"-strategy. Even when a person or a group has a proven track-record of deception, human instinct is surprisingly averse to just writing off other humans as being bald-faced and open liar, so "the truth must AT LEAST be somewhere in the middle".

File: file.png (197 KB, 250x375)

197 KB PNG

Chud pandering is where careers go to die.

>>223887855
>how is any part of that supposed to be funny?
It's a humorous observation about a contradiction between what is expected and what is actually observed (in this case, specifically about what modern women tend to claim they are doing vs. the observable way they do it), and most people find that funny because it's something they do, have observed.
This is basic "humor", autismo. Do leftiststs GENUINELY need to even have basic concepts like "humor" explained to them, in laborious detail, at this point? Really? I thought you idiots couldn't shut up about how you were supposedly the ONLY ones who could write comedy, be creative, etc., and a number of other wildly false claims? Why do you need something that your side is supposedly the exclusive masters of explained to you, as if it were some kind of completely alien concept to you?

>>223888220
>Chud pandering
This isn't a real thing. Just like """chuds""" aren't a real thing.
"""Chud pandering""" is literally just what you label any kind of humor, or entertainment in general, that triggers you.

File: shane-gillis-memes-7-2024(...).jpg (23 KB, 600x318)

23 KB JPG

>>223888039

>>223888220
Because the audience stops showing up or because producers stop giving them gigs?

>>223887556
>boo you fuckin suck
>actually watch it and the audience laughed
Why this faggot cartoonist lie?

Another seething woman or emasculated man acting like Shane grabbed some exercise bands and methodically strangled his three children to death while his wife was out buying the family dinner or something

>>223888229
Oh of course, women are actually whoring when they’re exercising at the gym. What a great joke! I can barely breathe from all the laughter

>>223888127
Yeah the redditfag blue hair crowd never liked him to begin with, he was always for the chud bros. If anything this will just gain him more chud bro fans like the first time they cancelled him in 2019

>>223888279
This. Normal people would have literally zero problem if most men were exercizing nude at the gym (or if they did have a problem with it they'd be in the wrong), but if women did it these chuds would complain.

>>223888031
>The audience and cast all hate him.

>the audience
The Live Studio Audience was certainly laughing, so that's not true.
You could argue that what you're saying is true if, maybe, what you meant by "the audience" was the total collective of people that actually still watch SNL at all. But they also only started collectively caterwauling about Gillis AFTER the fact and after they had been handed their ideological marching-orders from other leftists as to what their collective reaction was to be.

>and cast
Then why do they keep INVITING him back on? Multiple times?

>>223887677
>how can I make this unrelated situation instead be about Orange Man, and how is is supposedly bad?...
Textbook TDS.

>>223888301
>Then why do they keep INVITING him back on? Multiple times?
From management it's about either reforming him or showing him failing to reform. This drives engagement either way. From the rest of the cast there are probably still quite a few who still have a sense of humur.

>>223888245
Okay, buddy. If it's imaginary, then don't get all sentimental and defensive about it, you angry princess.

>>223888229
bodied that freak

>>223888229
Yeah it’s funny the same way me calling your mom a whore is. We all know it’s true but we don’t say it out loud.

>>223888279
>women are actually whoring when they’re exercising at the gym
That's what they're dressing like they are doing, yes. That's the observation, and the root of the joke: Modern women have begun a trend of dressing in a way advantageous to attracting male attention/potential mates when working-out, rather than dressing in a way that is advantageous for working-out.
That's the observed contradiction that was observed, and this became humorous. What is your issue with this?

File: Wut Chuck.png (308 KB, 521x340)

308 KB PNG

>>223887556
So, Leftists: How's that whole "Rightwingers are the REAL snowflakes"-narrative you've been trying to push going???

>>223887556
Did the snl live audience boo him and yell you fucking suck?

That wouldve been funny

>>223888271
See: >>223888191

>>223887632
that's not even the joke. The joke is he's "in the back of multiple tiktoks", because he keeps looking at their asses.
It's self deprecating. Everyone threw a melty over the word whore, and didn't even hear what the joke was.

>>223888355
Wearing workout clothes doesn’t make you a whore. Either you hate women or you don’t understand what the word actually means.

>>223888390
So it’s a garbage joke where he couldn’t even deliver the supposed punchline well. How is this guy a successful standup again?

>>223888229
They actually do, since they have spent years breaking comedy down to a formula (punch up, and challenge power) that has nothing to do with being funny.

Funny accents and stupid people falling over are fucking hilarious. Everyone knows they are. Leftists have no room within their worldview to consider that comedy(unless it's a white person).

>>223888398
>>223888413
>that funny joke you heard? heh, actually, it's not funny
thanks, whore

>>223888398
Show your tits cunt

>>223888413
He delivers it fine. You were just having a meltdown, and stopped hearing words.

>>223888333
>don't get all sentimental and defensive
I'm not though? I simply told you that you are pushing a false narrative, and justifying it with meaningless, constructed buzzwords that don't actually reflect reality. What part of that is "sentimental and defensive"?

Note that accusing your critics of being """defensive""" when they refute your argument is a textbook non-argument used by weasley, disingenuous idiots who have run out of actual arguments, and it's a HUGE red-flag to thrid-party observers indicating that you have most likely just indeed run out of actual arguments.

>>223888279
If your argument is "this joke is not funny specifically for me therefore it shouldn't be funny for everybody else" then sure go on with it but don't expect people to take you seriously because this is lunacy

>>223888413
He's still mentally operating in a world where the audience is somewhat more sophisticated. The SNL audience is at a much lower level.

For much of the modern audience, they only really want to hear that the comic is putting down people they hate or building up people they like. If it's ambiguous it's safer for them to just react like they don't get it, because laughing at the wrong thing is social suicide.

>>223888398
You're saying there is nothing that a man or woman can wear to workout at a public bixesual gym that would be inappropriate? But people reacting badly to what they're wearing would always be inappropriate?

whores dress more demure than gym thots though

>>223888462
You're probably right. I hadn't even considered that. Shows like SNL don't exist to deliver comedy. They exist for left leaning people to tune in, and hear things they agree with repeated back at them.
They're literally confused that someone showed up and delivered a basic set.
It was't even especially complex stuff. Just bog standard "I'm a fat guy, and I have self image problems" comedy.
But I guess if it's not "Trump is a fascist", the audience become scared and confused.

>>223887966
Nietzsche spoke of this

>>223888352
This right here is very telling:
In ADDITION to trying to deflect with an Ad Hom, this leftcuck is unintentionally admitting what everyone either suspects or already outright knows to be true:
You're literally mad at Gillis for stating the truth.
That's what "we all know it’s true but we don’t say it out loud" means: You've established (or at least TRIED to establish) a social taboo against admitting the reality of things, and then you just kind of expect everyone to be on board with that, and react with the same kind of outrage you do when an actually universally agreed-upon taboo is violated.
You tried to play it off as a joke, but this is unintentionally a genuinely accurate insight into the very Soviet-inspired methodology that leftists use to control people and push their agenda in society.

>>223888482
There's also a whole ecosystem of right leaning conservative podcasts or streamers who do the same thing, they're just enjoying their position as the 'opposition' right now.

>>223888509
I'm not saying they're good comedians either.
That said, Rogan isn't even right leaning. He's a stoner who likes hearing about the aliens.

>>223888526
Joe Rogan always seemed to be fine having anyone on his podcast, it leans away from leftists only because they believe in 'deplatforming' and 'canceling' people so a leftist is really taking a risk to go on. And he got a metric fuckton of glowfrens as regulars for whatever reason, they just like to stir up trouble.

>>223888398
>Wearing workout clothes doesn’t make you a whore.
Again, that's not what's happening, and that's not what Gillis was highlighting.
Again, there is a current trend of women NOT wearing "workout clothes" when working-out, and instead wearing clothes that are less practical or even outright disadvantageous for working-out and are instead more so designed to attract male attention.

Note that this phenomenon, while a logical contradiction, isn't even necessarily being highlighted is something inherently "negative"; if women want to attract male attention, even while doing other things supposedly unrelated to that endeavor, most people won't take TOO MUCH umbrage with that, even men.
HOWEVER, that acceptance will require two very reasonable concessions from women:
1. It needs to also be socially acceptable to acknowledge this truth, just like it should be socially acceptable to acknowledge ANYTHING that's the truth, i.e. the opposite of the reaction to Gillis' basic-bitch observations. It's fine if you do [X], but DON'T do [X] but then claim you're NOT doing [X] and instead doing [Y] and simultaneously get uppity when people say you are doing [X].
2. Women also need to stop this recent trend of pretending that you're being victimized when you SUCCEED in attracting male attention while working-out. I.e. the endless social-media posts about how the icky, toxic men are supposedly "leering at you" and already planning your imminent rape becsuse they dared glance at the impractical clothing you chose to work-out in because it shows off your ass.

>>223888552
right. They literally pushed a doofy "peace and love" stoner guy out of their tent, of their own accord, and now they're angry at him because he keeps "platforming" people like Elon Musk and Donald Trump (they show up to the podcast. Presumably far-leftists don't, because they don't want to have to explain themselves)

>>223888496
Wow someone really hates their whore mother, no gratitude at all

>>223887575
This. I don’t think he’s funny but I don’t think any other standup comedian currently breathing air is either. At least he didn’t cuck for the 9/11 assholes

>>223888590
uh oh. melty

>>223887556
the problem with anything right wing is it can only be right wing at the expense of the left so it gets old fast

>>223888572
>you’re wearing what I think are impractical clothes so you are a whore

Why aren’t you filling stadiums with such amazing wit, anon?

File: 1556097651211.png (87 KB, 728x727)

87 KB PNG

>>223888509
>There's also a whole ecosystem of right leaning conservative podcasts or streamers who do the same thing,

May I see it?

>>223888482
>They exist for left leaning people to tune in, and hear things they agree with repeated back at them.
People will claim that this is some kind of "canard" used by "rightwingers" that supposedly doesn't reflect reality, but my personal experience has outright confirmed this to be true.
When my family was together for the holidays, my NYC-dwelling younger brother of course needed to put on a "hilarious" SNL skit that aired recently for us to watch. It was of course some unfunny & completely joke-free drivel where Baldwin's Trump just gets casually lectured over and over again about how stupid he and his policies are by random people at a party. But that's not what proved my point, as that's just MY arguably biased description of the content being "unfunny".
What proved my point was that throughout the entire thing, nobody in my family, nor even my brother, once laughed at this supposedly "hilarious" sketch. Not ONCE. Even the live studio-audience barely chuckled throughout it. They of course applauded raucously at both the beginning and especially the end of the sketch, and my younger brother of course nodded along in agreement with what was being discussed in the sketch several times. But he didn't laugh, not once. Not even a snicker.
Not very "hilarious" then, huh?

>>223888317
>trumptard loves wokeness and can't read
typical

>>223888578
>they show up to the podcast. Presumably far-leftists don't
bernie sanders did. kamala wouldn't without him having to travel and agreeing to a large lists of topics not to discuss. he isn't really that politically motivated

>>223887575
>saudi blood money LE BAD
>american blood money LE GUD
>>223888595
>muh heckin nine eleven-erino
Lol. You retards are the biggest bunch of war mongering savages on the planet. Fuck outta here with that faux moral outrage bullshit.

>>223888603
>Why aren’t you filling stadiums with such amazing wit, anon?

Gillis does, while leftards are melting down over it, screaming with tears in their eyes that they need to reeducate him.

>>223888664
Aishatollah died screaming.

>>223888603
>Why aren’t you filling stadiums
i think he just broke the record for that, some 75000 tickets sold

>>223888509
>There's also a whole ecosystem of right leaning conservative podcasts or streamers who do the same thing
You Redditor faggots keep claiming this but I am yet to see actual proof of this supposed fucking "ecosystem" even existing, let alone being any sort of "popular" or having any sort of "influence" on anything.

This makes a lot more sense when you consider that redditors like you complaining about this are also inevitably the same ones complaining about Critical Drinker and other people "unapproved" by the Wokeoid Politiburo whose comedic content triggers you are supposedly guilty of this.
The reality is that, no, it's not "two sides of le same coin!". You just desperately wish it were, because you need it to be for your narrative to work. What you consider to be """right-leaning""" and """rightwing-pandering""" comedy is literally just "any comedy that ISN'T approved by the woke-cult".
You encounter things that were just what humor was generally like prior to the Wokeoid Cultural Revolution, and you label it shit like """chud-pandering""". That's why even shit like Mel Brooks movies and other things that were previously acceptable but are now deemed """offensive""" by wokeoids unironically get accused of being """chud-pandering""", despite the obvious contradiction and how insipidly anachronistic that claim is.

The reality is that it's not, and has never been, a conflict between "wokeoids vs. anti-woke"/"chuds"/whatever.
It has literally just always just been "wokeoids vs. everyone else".

>>223887556
Go woke go broke, snowflakes

>>223888603
>you’re wearing what I think are impractical clothes
No, they ARE impractical clothes. You're just uppity about it.

>>223887966
Me neither

>>223888696
>screaming
So were the kids after your pedophile president diddled them on that island

>>223888747
regardless of whether they're practical, they're designed specifically to show their entire ass. You can totally just buy a pair of shorts that don't do that.
Sargon had a video about this. And they brought up a store page where you can buy the shorts in question, where it literally advertises the fact that they show off your ass. That's the entire point.

>>223888726
>Critical Drinker and other people

Ummmm, you see, a guy who does reviews using illegal camrips of most recent releases is a corporate plant, chud.

>>223888726
You want me to say it's bigger or more popular than the mainstream liberal media? It isn't.

It's lumped in with anyone who is not in the mainstream, even though the only thing they have in common is that they're not the mainstream. The overall 'opposition' media is comparable with the mainstream, the conservative or right-leaning part is only a fraction of it. Even people who are really quite liberal, like Shane Gillis or Joe Rogan or JK Rowling or Rob Schneider, get lumped in with the actual paid GOP shills. They're absolutely fine saying they're all part of the same thing because that strategy worked to get Trump in in 2016 (the 'Obama/Trump' voter just wanted a break from the status quo, didn't get it either time), and the liberals are also fine saying they're all part of the same thing because then they don't have to consider that they could change some of their policies to get more votes (not if they can just say that every and only the racists & sexists refuse to vote for them).

>>223888774
>pedophile president
My president isn't Iranian though.

File: 1645802266308.gif (757 KB, 450x242)

757 KB GIF

i respect women and their right to wear carefully engineered and certificated whore shapewear approved by sport wear brands with certificate to say what sports wear is, and their whore clothes got approved

>>223887855
The part that makes you seethe

>>223887556
What's with the rampant whore apologists? Why are there so many pussy ass niggas?

File: OIP-4269690442.jpg (28 KB, 400x223)

28 KB JPG

>>223888774
>pedophile president

Wow it's literally over for him

>>223887694
Funny how leftards all of a sudden wants to be "burgers?" when they were cool with blacked or faggot tranny messaging in ads