>Men are...LE EVIL
Well, yes
>>223910846>he has no counterargument
>>223910846>I THINK ALL MEN ARE SEXIST>SO I'LL MAKE A SEXIST FILM ABOUT ALL MEN BEING SEXIST>wait... i'm the sexist n-now?>ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE...>oh... wait i'm doing it again>i'm doing the very thing i'm accusing THEM of>now i'm confused>BUT I KNOW I'M RIGHT
reminder that feminists don't even accept that such a thing as "misandry" existsThey define themselves as seeking "gender equality" but women are perpetual victims and men perpetual oppressors in their worldview. They hate you for being male, not for anything you've doneNever ever support feminists. Humiliate them as much as you can get away with
>>223910846"my son displays a general garment and you claim it is cut to your fit. What a fascinating revelation" - DuneI think of this quote every time someone takes a movie personally here
>>223910950>If I flagelatte myself hard enough online, maybe women will start to accept me
>>223910950this is definitely a sexual thing
>>223910846There's a reason why it's industry standard not to leave moid teachers alone with students, funeral home employees with corpses, etc.
>>223910950Feminist equivalent of house niggers. Men like this are always the meanest to their fellow men and do nothing to "lift them up"
>>223910846>>Men are...LE EVILi am
>>223911029This is the shirt of a woman who rims ass on the first date.
Women being retarded hypocrites doesn't mean that men aren't evil
>>223911071Men aren't intrinsically evil for being men anymore than women are intrinsically evil simply for being women. Two wrongs don't make a right
>>223910967Same thing with niggers that don’t accept racism against whites exist
>>223911111Quints of truth
>>223911106Men cause far more suffering to other beings than women do.
>>223910950I dream of a mass redditor suicide.
>>223911216Source?
>>223910950this is just sad man
>>223910846Imagine telling your friends you're seeing Men tonight lmao
>Men are more dangerous than wild bears and we can't even go out in public without being hassled. >We are also completely against more police, stricter laws, and restrictions on immigration from rapey countries.Can someone explain the reason most women think like this?
>>223911291Get more experience observing and analyzing male and female behavior, under many systems
>>223911360Feminist women have an instinctive contempt for men they deem weak or unattractive and don't see a fellow human being who may have understandable reasons for being that way (all their yapping about men being unable to empathise with women is projection, like all mainstream feminist talking points. It's just inherent in the worldview)>>223911367>doesn't even attempt to defend their retarded sweeping statementPathetic
Manly, man, men, men....MEEEEEEEN!
>>223911360>women >thinkthat's the problem right there. you just described something that doesn't happen.females are NPCs at heart. they are incapable of thought.
>>223910846cornell 7
Wasn't every man in this movie actually some monster shapeshifter?
>>223911360They lie and want to either kill you or enslave you for resources and bend you as much as they can just below the snapping point.
>>223910975qrd? I don't get it
>>223911611Blake's 7
>>223911685But they're also the more empathetic genderThey're such empathetic creatures of such emotional depth that all they can talk about is how much depth they have
We kinda are though.Women are so soft, and warm, and nice.I almost feel bad when I accidentally scare them when walking around at night with my aggressive gait.>>223911415GOAT youtubepoop
>>223911400>I don't know that males are more competitive and antisocial and females are more cooperative and prosocialGoogle that shit yourself
>>223911938Denounce the SCUM Manifesto
>>223911983Why?
As a man, it befuddles me to think I could easily overpower and rape women. Which is why I choose to be the better man and not rape women.
>>223911111the idea is racism requires power. So blacks can be racist to say muslims, or indians. But not whites.
>>223910950>as a man> <300ng/dL testosterone
>>223912054Good job anon. Now extend this to all facets of your behaviour, if you haven't already. Men should be conscious of every intention and effect of all of their actions, down to the smallest detail.
>>223910846That wasn't the message albeit
>>223911841In this context, means a movie has a general theme like "there are evil men" and someone gets really offended as though they had been called evil. Sort of a self report put in more modern terms. For the book context you just gotta go read it.
>>223911866It takes a lot of empathy to say how empathic you are and also it's empathic to get rid off your own offspring or see plenty of women as enemies and men as disposable. It also takes empathy skills to check what values are currently popular and won't get you into trouble and then start believing them.
>>223912032>playing dumb alreadyThis type of weaselly dishonesty is why even women increasingly (and rightly) hate feminists.
>>223912169How shallow a persons beliefs must be for "please elaborate even a little bit" to be perceived as "playing dumb". As if you hope it's self evident because you don't have anything deeper with which to answer such a simple question
>>223910923>>wait... i'm the sexist n-now?You think Feminists / Leftists are self aware??They are not even people, dude. The leftist mind virus is to vilify and gas themselves up on past imagined injuries and victimization .>>OMG women weren't allow a credit card in the 1970 !!Therefore all the abuse and violence they do now is not abuse or violence it is revenge, and justified and they are the "good guys".
>>223910950What a lack of male father figures does to a mfer
>>223912169What does the SCUM manifesto have to do with male and female behavior? It was clickbait in its day and a historical footnote, it's totally irrelevant to the current discussion. Saying such isn't weaselly, it's weaselly to bring it up in place of actual discussion or argument.
>>223912276>It was clickbait in its day and a historical footnote, it's totally irrelevant to the current discussion.Lying cunt
>>223912288What possible reason would anyone discuss the SCUM manifesto when having a serious discussion about current male and female behavior? Nobody cares about what some feminist hag wrote 60 years ago.
>>223910846Is this some tragic last ditch attempt to abuse the already dead culture to stave off the coming just-desserts and hard reset that the Matriarchy has feared from the day it made its first unjust victory over decency and normality (patriarchy)?
>>223912365Would anyone have to discuss*Please, describe how the SCUM manifesto explains how men and women work
>>223912365>what possible reason would anyone have for discussing the foundational text of radical feminism?Cosmic-tier mystery>Nobody cares about what some feminist hag wrote 60 years ago.Feminists care, and feminists unfortunately have a lot of influence in the contemporary West
>>223912428None of this bullshit explains how women are worse than men or better than men. It's historical trivia
>>223912515It's amazing how shamelessly feminists will just string random words together to try to defend their worthless ideology from the slightest scrutiny.I'm not playing your game, cunt.
>>223912122so the character who says that in the book is saying that about a person who thinks everything is about themself? like calling out main character syndrome?
>>223912565You have not described one way in how women are worse than men, you just point at a book existing
>>223910950>that last comment
>>223912586>You have not described one way in how women are worse than men,I was never attempting to describe this either. This entire post chain began because I suggested that individual people should be judged by their own actions, not by their gender
Is this why they made Obsession?To fight sarcastic visual metaphor with...something "original"?
>>223912372meds
Being evil is cringe and low IQ, everyone thinks your retarded
>>223911360most normie humans (male and female) have a substantial disconnect between who/what they consciously think they are and who/what they actually are subsconsciously. In most women this manifests for instance in them claiming to like certain attributes in men but then displaying a preference for the exact opposites in practice, e.g. women claiming to be feminists and then dating known abusers, or claiming to not want men to be violent but then getting turned on when their boyfriend beats up a guy. This applies to men also of course but in less specific ways and usually with less retarded/societally damaging outcomes. Women are also very bad at running complex implication simulations in their head compared to men (what's known as "systems intelligence" iirc which women are statistically much worse at than men on average) meaning that they find it hard to extrapolate what the second-order consequences of their views (which are often emotional reactions rather than well thought out rational arguments) would be when applied in practice. A good example is immigration; their knee-jerk emotional reaction is that being harsh on immigration is bad because it seems "mean" to them, without considering the second order effects of letting a bunch of rapists and murderers into your country en masse. It's worth noting that men are retarded in their own specific ways too, the ultimate point should always be that men and women should collaborate together, but previous societal models knew how to enforce this partnership much better than the present does, the present model has destroyed that partnership and allowed both genders to fall victim to the worse sides of their respective psyches.
>>223910950consider me rage baited
>>223911611OI WUZ ROIPED
>>223912769This post was great until you implied that both genders are equally to blame for the current mess
>>223910950niggas being cucked by themselves
>>223910950average liberal
>>223910950These guys are the ones saying obsession is a healthy movie for men to watch
>>223910967>>223911111Based and checked
>>223912622Revealing that they stopped responding after this post
>>223910846Gee... where have I seen this before?
>>223913587>women cannot be blamed because they lack agency,Bullshit, they know exactly what they're doing and deserve to be held accountable. You're a simp and implicit feminist, fuck you.
>>223912073jew idea
>>223910871>Well, yes
>>223913210Movies are not "healthy" or "unhealthy" to watch. They are movies. You have people on the left embracing Obsession as some kind of culturally significant statement about male guilt and people on the right rejecting the movie on the same basis and both are abject retards. It's a horror movie, not a dissertation for a college course. Everyone takes shit too goddamn seriously these days and it's why talking to anyone of any strong political affiliation is completely exhausting
>>223914157you pretending it’s about nothing is copeThe people making it knew exactly what they were doing and know exactly what world we live in and what times we are in
>>223911400Do you see a fellow human being when you look at a feminist? You're just the pot calling the kettle black
>>223914214Most pathetic attempt at a "no u" I've seen in a while.>You're just the pot calling the kettle blackGod forbid I dislike people who base their entire worldview on hating me for my gender, and not for anything I've actually on an individual level.Again, all the mainstream feminist talking points are projection. I see "fellow human beings", but I also see bad people who deserve nothing but my contempt and hostility
>>223914181I didn't say it was about nothing. I'm saying that viewing every new piece of media that comes out as another battle in an endless culture war just means you have a persecution complex, if you complain about too many black people in movies you're displaying the same kind of attenion-desperate victimhood as poeple who complain that there need to be more black people in movies. It used to be that people went to the movies in order to watch movies and they didn't spend the whole time thinking about what they were going to tweet about it when they got home.>b-but that's THEIR fault! they made movies into propaganda, not me!Just another way to completely avoid taking any personal responsibility for the trajectory of your own life and the way you navigate the world around you
>>223914214nta but noI think of them like the flood in halo
>>223914288>if you have media literacy you have a persecution complexAt least you admit you have no real point
>>223914282>God forbid I dislike people who base their entire worldview on hating me for my gender, and not for anything I've actually on an individual level.The problem is you're holding feminism as an ideology accountable when you should judge shitty people on an individual basis as being shitty rather than insisting it has some broad sweeping implications about whatever ideology they've adopted. It's the *exact* same thing as saying all men are rapist pigs and highlighting the bad behavior of individuals as proof that all men are like that. You are literally guilty of the exact behavior paradigm that the people you feel persecuted by are guilty of, just with different labels.
>>223914297On the contrary. If you look at Obsession and see some kind of screed against men it's because you lack fundamentally in media literacy.
>>223914335nta but this is a worthless “no u” gaslightnothing he’s doing is wrong and you seem to want to use diffusion as a defense for what he’s criticizing
>>223914335>The problem is you're holding feminism as an ideology accountableYes. See>>223910967
>>223914365It's disgusting how shamelessly they lie. You can at least respect the "radical" feminists for being honest about their hatred for men, for all that they're still worthless loons
>>223914354you didn’t say howI’ll say how you’re wrong thoughThe mechanism of the movie and the ensuing discussion prove what the ultimate outcome of the script and production and marketing is which is nothing but more excuses for women being encouraged to keep their options open at all times while saying only men have to be transparent about their intentions (unless pumping and dumping like ian)which only leads to further unrestrained hypergamy and the complete fracture of anything in interpersonal dynamics outside of purely mercantile things like looks money and status it is a net negative to humanity and could never be made as anything less than a pure psa on how to add more restriction to male behavior and removing shame from female behavior
>>223914365If nothing he's doing is wrong, nothing the feminists are doing is wrong. Because it's the exact same fucking thing. Calling that diffusion is just missing the point.
>>223910846that was so fucking tedious
>>223914405It’s the same tactic jews use when goyim are over the target>umm you have to name individuals even though all straight white christian males ARE always bad and are all the same
>>223914420Stupid circular woman logic Just say you’re a feminist and stop pretending to be anything else
>>223914410>The mechanism of the movie and the ensuing discussion proveNo, they don't.
>>223914454Well that proves it
>>223914447>the argument you made that I can't refute actually doesn't count because you're one of THEMActually proving my point. You're doing the exact same shit that man-hating feminists do when they lump all men together as being the same.
>>223914479You have no point
>>223914479All women are the same nowadays They are literally a terminally online hivemind You’re one of them and your argument is worthless and shallow
>>223914479This is like calling nazis jews for describing jewish behavior as if it negates whatever is being criticized A meaningless rhetorical trick that’s not even a trick because it does nothing to change what’s being discussed
>>223911111Check dem quints baby!!!
>>223914420>Because it's the exact same fucking thing.No it isn't lmfao, I'm criticising feminism as an ideology for being misandrist and feminists for being too cowardly to state that openly, not women in general.I'm sure this is another post you'll ignore because you can't play the victim in your response to it.
>>223910901>implying
>>223910846These threads just show how nobody bitching in here actually watched the movie.
>>223914474You're the one suggesting that the way you interpreted the movie is some kind of objective fact. I'm arguing the opposite. I'll also add that if you're male ego is so weak that it can be undermined and threatened by a movie, it's because you're a sensitive widdle baby. That is my point. Everyone is too goddamn sensitive. No one watched The Shining in 1980 and moaned about how it was some kind of statement about how all men are violent muderers at heart and all women are blah blah blah. Sure, it has deeper themes about marital strain and domestic life that can be explored. That's a fine thing to do, whether you like the movie or dislike it. The difference is the pearl clutching way in which the modern audience does it. The way in which you extrapolate to mean that the movie is "dangerous" and "subversive" because it allegedly argues something that you don't want argued. A feminist could just as easily get offended by Obsession by interpreting it as being about how women have absolutely no agency and are hapless to what happens to them and it perpetuates victimhood in women! And I'd tell that feminist she was a moron too, for the same reason I'm telling you that you're a moron. Not every single fucking thing needs to be another hastily assembled soapbox for your outrage culture addicted persecution complex.(I'll also just head you off at the pass and clarify that I don't think The Shining and Obsession are qualitatively comparable, The Shining is obviously the much better movie. Before someone tried to claim that I suggested otherwise...)
but has anyone seen that movie?
Was there ever a female dictator?
won't read this thread because I bet it's some retarded political nonsense but what in the fuck was the message of this movie? I didn't get it at all
>>223914658New copypasta just dropped
>>223910923they're not this self aware. to them it's impossible to discriminate against white men in any way
>>223914678>alienate half the planet>"why is no one watching my propaganda!?!"
>>223914655All the mentally ill political retards who post about this movie just endlessly seethe about some made up fanfic version of the movie in their heads.
>>223914594>I'm criticising feminism as an ideology for being misandristWhich it isn't. Feminism is only misandrist when it is misused.>I'm sure this is another post you'll ignore because you can't play the victim in your response to it.I'm not playing the victim. You are. Your whole point is that you're being victimized by men-hating feminists and that makes it okay to label them all as misandrist lunatics without exception. Which is exactly what said misandrist lunatics do: they say that because they have been victimized by men they're whole life, it is okay for them to treat men like shit and label them all as rapists who want to control and destroy women. They are wrong, and so are you. And both of you are perpetuating a cycle of self-sustaining outrage and victimhood that defines our current cesspool of a culture.I'll also add that it's not "NO U" because I'm not saying that the feminists you criticize aren't guilty of doing what you're suggesting. Those people do exist, and do suck. I'm suggesting that the way you extrapolate that into some larger statement of all feminists (and yes, you are implying it expands out to all women despite trying to pivot) is exactly what they do. They extrapolate, generalize, marginalize. Refuse to accept nuance. And so do you.
>>223914788>Feminism is only misandrist when it is misused.Oh shut the fuck up.
>>223914632I will now watch your movie.
>>223914486This post is the definition of ironic
>>223914788>Feminism is only misandrist when it is misused.prove it faggot. because if thats true its been "misused" since its inception.its built into the ideology.
>>223914493>All women are the same nowadaysAgain, you're proving my point. I would criticize a person who said "all men are the same nowadays" for much of the same reason. And so would you, yet you engage in the same behavior without a shred of self-awareness.
>>223914479
I didn't realize the majority of guys in the film were played by the same dude. I assumed they looked weird because they were bongs. Do I lack media literacy?
>>223914694The main character is so traumatized by what her crazy boyfriend did to her that she projects it onto every other man that she sees. It's actually an indictment of misandry, which is why it's so funny that limp wristed males think it's about how all men are le evil, but that's because they think that about literally everything.
>>223914895>you're secretly one of THEM so what you think doesn't COUNTThis is the tactic a person resorts do when they can't dismantle an argument with reason or intellect and have to resort to ad hominem. Although really, posting any meme image or wojak as a reply is automatically a concession
>>223914844>prove it faggotThe burden of proof is on the one making the accusation. Prove to me that "all men are le evil sexist pigs" is "built into" the ideology of feminism.
>>223914733Limp wristed man babies who see persecution around every corner are not half the planet
>>223914694Its about toxic masculinity.And it doesn't matter that during the movie it differentiates between bad men and good men (who happen to be brown), because the title encompasses all men - something women would complain about to a far greater extent if the title/subject were reversed.
>>223914853one side is actually right
>>223914901Kinda? I mean I knew who Rory Kinnear was before I saw it so that probably helped me recognize him through all the different makeup but I still think I would have noticed eventually
>>223914971>cant give ONE example of this fantasy feminism he claims existsconcession accepted
>>223914694>what in the fuck was the message of this movie?Retarded political nonsense
>>223914655>>223914774I watched it and this thread is very relevant to the content of the film You’re a seething retard
>>223914971The entire ideology is premised on the idea that "gender equality" is synonymous with dismantling alleged oppression of women by men. Why do you think it's called "feminism"?
>>223910901Women are very much at fault for men being born but they like to sidestep accountability
>>223914788All you’re trying to do is reframe things >>223914914Has Alex garland ever said this is what it’s about >>223914947You been getting btfo all thread>>223915006he’s right
>>223915047I'm sure a man-hating feminist would say the exact same thing and I would criticize her for being so indoctrinated by her tunnel-visioned, self-congratulating, shithead-behavior-excusing worldview that she might as well have her head permanently lodged in her own anus. And I say the same to you, newfriend.
>>223914947>you're secretly one of THEM so what you think doesn't COUNTThey didn't that, they're just mocking you for being too cowardly to state your ideological allegiance openly
>>223913210>These guys are the ones saying obsession is a healthy movie for men to watchIt is. It's warns men that bitches are crazy.
>>223915060>cant give ONE example of this fantasy feminism he claims existsWell you haven't so far, but I'm all ears.
>>223914914it doesnt matter because the movie is titled MEN.Imagine the outrage if Obsession didnt have the wish plot and it was just about a crazy obsessive gf - and it was titled WOMEN.
the girl was cute and hot, would plow into oblivionI'm out (but not out of her LOL)
>>223915110Can you please stop ignoring every post highlighting that feminism is intrinsically hostile to men? You've earned none of the smugness exuding from every one of the posts you've made ITT. You're an insufferable pseudointellectual with nothing genuinely insightful to contribute and should shut the fuck up until you're willing to stop attacking straw men.
>>223911029>There's a reason why it's industry standard not to leave moid teachers alone with students, funeral home employees with corpses, etc.It's literally not an industry standard, but a good idea if you want to avoid being falsely accused.
>>223915067nah
>>223915077It's premised on the idea that women aren't lesser to men. That's why it's called feminism. Do misandrists use it as a way to exonerate misandry by justifying it as a response to oppression? Absolutely. Does that condemn the entire ideology? Not even a little, unless you never wanted women to be equal in the first place.
>>223911360They're traitors with rape fantasies.
>>223915120>Feminism is only misandrist when it is misused>STILL no examplesno.u.
>>223915136sorry but this post means nothing
>>223915146Your made up rules are noted and promptly thrown in the trash
>>223915133Disagreeing is not ignoring.>You've earned none of the smugness exuding from every one of the posts you've made ITT.People always say this when I disagree with them and it makes them mad.>until you're willing to stop attacking straw men.My entire argument is that people should stop building strawmen, actually. I haven't made any sweeping, general statements about massive demographics of people. I'm encouraging you to stop doing it.
>>223915146Women and men are not equal.Men allow women to have equal OPPORTUNITY (at least in Western Civilization - the same civilization that rally against).
>>223915146>It's premised on the idea that women aren't lesser to men.Disingenuous weasel response, as expected.I say YET AGAIN:>feminism defines itself as the movement for "gender equality".>gender equality - without exception - is defined as men oppressing women (hence why the ideology is called FEMINISM)>as a result, the ideology cannot be anything but hostile to men, since men can only oppress women, not vice versaYou know this, but you won't admit it openly, because you're an intellectual coward.
>>223915152>no.u.At least you're being honest that's literally all you're doing. If you wanted a single example of feminists who are not only sex positive but male positive, you could easily find it if you were so inclined. You just aren't.
>>223915193Your encouragement has no incentive for me
>>223915215>Women and men are not equal.And there it is in black and white. Even if feminism was NEVER misandrist you would still hate it.
>>223915193>People always say this when I disagree with themBecause you're such a unique, insightful iconoclast, right?
>>223915250>I have no incentive to stop being a belligerent retardThat's quite clear.
>>223915240the reason why you dont give these "easy to find" examples is because you're a disingenuous faggot who knows they are the exception to the rule.basically you concede without conceding like a coward.
>>223915274I don't think there's any way I could disagree with you about anything without you viewing me as smug and arrogant as a result. It's just how you seem to operate.
>>223910950male feminists are like jewish nazis
>>223915293The fact that you even admit there are exceptions actually is an unambiguous concession from you, since your entire conceit in asking me to provide evidence is based on the implication that you think such a thing literally does not exist. It also proves that even if I did provide examples you would not accept any examples I provided as being anything other than the exception proving the rule, so I'm glad I didn't waste my time doing it.
>>223915268>ignore the rest of the postkek. Classic dishonesty of the left.True equality doesnt exist. Men in general are better at some things, women in general are better at other things.You actually needed this basic concept explained to you like a child?No youre just a lying cunt.
>>223915325>I don't think there's any way I could disagree with you about anything without you viewing me as smug and arrogant as a result.Actually there is; you could just stop being smug and arrogant.Why don't you try that?
>>223915349>still not ONE exampleyes we already established your cowardly concession.
>>223915268>And there it is in black and white. Even if feminism was NEVER misandrist you would still hate it.Feminism is misandrist by nature in the same way transgenderism is misogynist.Both are a struggle against reality and nature itself. Feminism HAS to hate men, because in trying to be "equal" with men, something that can never be, it hates and resents the ideal and has to drag it down to below their level.Much the same as a tranny hates and resents the woman he will never be no matter how much surgery and hormones he has.They are the true two sides of the same coin.
>>223915125>Imagine the outrage if Obsession didnt have the wish plot and it was just about a crazy obsessive gf - and it was titled WOMEN.KINO
>>223915223This is one of the most ludicrous strawmen I have ever seen.>feminism defines itself as the movement for "gender equality".I'm with you so far.>gender equality - without exception - is defined as men oppressing womenNo, gender equality is defined as gender equality. As in the two genders being equal. That's why it's called that.>as a result, the ideology cannot be anything but hostile to men, since men can only oppress women, not vice versaThis is some weird autism fueled logic. So just because the circumstances at the time in which feminism was founded happened to be that men had societal advantages over women, this somehow renders it impossible that inequality could exist in any other dichotomy? Or furthermore it suggests that what ALL feminists want - without exception - is simply to reverse the inequality rather than to equalize it? That is quite a fucking leap, and one that you have in no way substantiated.>You know this, but you won't admit it openly, because you're an intellectual coward.People always say shit like this when they feel outsmarted.
>>223915285you insulting me and admitting there’s no incentive to do what you say makes me think I’m just over the target
>>223911360The most annoying thing about women is how they'll urge men to act a certain way and then very obviously prefer opening their legs for men who act in the exact polar opposite way.Why can't they just be honest with themselves?
>>223911360Because feminism is about attacking white men.
>>223915478>(hence why the ideology is called FEMINISM)You ignored this part. It was rather important.I hope for your sake you're a troll.
>>223915356>Men in general are better at some things, women in general are better at other things.Right. Women are better at cooking and cleaning and raising children, right? And men are better at enterprise, industry, leadership, decision making, etc... and you call ME a child.
>>223915478>No, gender equality is defined as gender equality. As in the two genders being equal.Then why is it called feminism, you dumb kike rat.
>>223915490Dual mating strategy They want to separate men in society into two separate boxes that must never touch or get mixed up
>>223915533Checked
>>223915364Could you maybe articulate what's so smug and arrogant about my posts? Other than the fact that I disagree with what you think and say things that you don't like, of course?
>>223915410Your posts are beginning to reek of desperation.This is your last (You), so enjoy it.
>>223911360when i walk down the boulevard w*men grab their purses tighter when they see me or scurry to the other side of the street etc. this has changed me in a deep and profound way but i have come to the conclusion if a w*man, unless its my mother, needs help i wont lift a finger
>>223910846mmmm foidslop
>>223915414Oh, you're a crazy person. Cool. I wish I had known that a few posts earlier.
>>223915482I would think the incentive to stop acting like an idiot would be obvious. If it isn't, I can't really help you.
>>223915562ok coward
>>223910950Reminder to never, ever simp for women. They will NOT fuck you for behaving like this. Observing women and seeing them be asked about mens problems shows how little they care about men as a whole. Men need to stop providing any and all services for women, they can solve their own problems.
>>223915514>>223915533So you're literally just resorting to semantics now.
>>223910950The redditor is so real for this. Committing suicide is the only option for some of us.
>>223915635Honestly simping for women because they won't fuck you is pathetic but how is having a lifelong vendetta against them because they won't fuck you any less pathetic?
>>223915546>Could you maybe articulate what's so smug and arrogant about my posts?>People always say this when I disagree with them
>>223915637>words no longer mean anythingOk.
>>223915664Me calling out pathetic faggots on reddit doesn't mean i'm also so desperate for pussy that I would debase myself for them or that pussy is my sole concern. Women need a wake up call and to be held accountable for their actions.
>>223915530>everyone is le same because... THEY JUST ARE, OK?The more economically developed and "equal" (opportunity) a country becomes, the greater the differences between men’s and women’s career choices can become, rather than those differences disappearing.So again, you either think like a child, or youre a lying cunt.
>>223915740You reek of being desperate for pussy, is all I'm saying.
>>223915767source: your ass
>>223915615Why would being insulted by you make me stop thinking and saying things that are true
>>223915635This>>223915664Not this>>223915779Seething woman confirmed
>>223915779If you say so pal. I don't think thats as great a condemnation as you might think, though. Most men ideally want women to be good people and to fuck them.
>>223915726It's called feminism because of the time and place in which it began, a time and place that inarguably was one of men having clear and distinct advantages over women. The ideology is founded on women being capable of more than the roles they at the time had been relegated to. Hence, feminism. So yes, feminism was founded on the idea of elevating women, which is why it has that fem prefix, but that in no way intrinsically implies elevating them beyond men. You know this, of course. You're just pretending that you don't. Rather than appreciating the context in which the term was formed and having a reasonable understanding for how terms become misleading as the context in which they exist evolves and changes over literal decades, you're being willfully ignorant because it serves your persecution complex in which women are the source of all of your problems.
>>223915795KEK, thats a very childish way to ask for a source.But here you go:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29442575/>implying you'll read itLMAO
>>223915664>having a lifelong vendetta against them because they won't fuck youHow the fuck is that your takeaway from what he said??I'd hate to say someone is projecting, but at best it's out of left field as fuck
>>223915635>Mum encouraged me to be sensitive, considerate and self aware>Openly despises me for acting that way because now i'm a "pussy"I learned young.
>>223915838Well, you accused me of building a strawman earlier. That implies you think it's a bad thing. If you continue doing it after admonishing me not to do it, you are either a hypocrite or an idiot. Or both. And yeah, if you don't think those are bad things for a person to be, I'm not confident I can explain it to you.
>>223915912>men don't care about women they only care about themselvesis very obviously something a man who has been rejected by a woman says while he's using his tears as lubricant for masturbation, I just call something that looks like a spade a spade man
>>223915869>It's called feminism becauseIt takes for granted that men are oppressors and women are victims. That's why men with common sense are hostile to it.>inarguablyLmao. This is why people hate you.
>>223915889You do realize that studies aren't proof, right? Like you can't just weaponize peer reviewed research to make your arguments for you? Ah, what am I saying, of course you don't
>>223915912It’s a woman
>>223915931yeah you’re a man hating retard that’s really all there is to it
>>223915967So you won't even admit that men had advantages over women in the early to mid 20th century? Sorry bud, that is willful ignorance.
>>223916073Again proving the point I made at the start of this whole thing. "Anyone who says anything I don't like hates men" is the EXACT same playbook as "anything who says anything I don't like hates women" and so you are guilty of exactly what you accuse feminists of and are therefore no better. And to make matters worse, you're completely lacking in any and all self awareness. Which means arguing with you in the first place was a total fool's errand.
>>223916043>source>NOOOOOO NOT LIKE THATkek, you cunts are unserious.
>>223916135see>>223914895
>>223916135a lot of words to say you’re a cunty feminist retard
>>223910846I knew it would be A24 before I clicked on the image. How anyone who's not female, gay, a subversive like Ari himself or totally fucked in the head watches any of their films is beyond me.
>>223910846that was such utter miserable shit. very disrespectful to the folk horror genre
>>223911400>Feminist womenare worthless! scores of worthless women who can't deal with the fact they're good for nothin.
some men are bad. some women are bad.some men are good. some women are good.don't play their fucking power game. state the obvious. they'll soon squirm away shouting "BIGOT"
>>223919043>some men are good. some women are good.most
>>223914067> fat ugly uber radical feminist > is actually just a pedophile zionist It's almost textbook case of feminist being a psyop.
>>223910846https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl5q4AIGGZQ
>>223910950KEK reminds me of people like this
>>223914788>I'm suggesting that the way you extrapolate that into some larger statement of all feminists (and yes, you are implying it expands out to all women despite trying to pivot)Feminism is an ideology, and like all ideologies it is not immune to criticism. If anything it deserves even more scrutiny in this day and age.
>>223914632Women, amirite?
>>223911841
>>223920070I think the most ridiculous Dworkin moment (apart from blatantly lying about being raped shortly before her death, casting doubt on the validity of all her earlier abuse claims) was when she sanctimoniously told a group of men that it was their responsibility to defend women like her from the "perverts and pimps" and that she could do nothing because she was "only a woman", all while neglecting her body to the point of becoming morbidly obese and dying before she hit 60Feminists don't even pretend to hold themselves to the standards they demand of men
>>223916083I question every claim made by feminists about alleged historical abuse of women. All self-respecting men should do the same
>>223911611The charges were dropped. Move on incel
>>223916083Men have "had advantages over women" since the caveman times. And women have had advantages that men never had. Whats your point, dumb cunt?
>>223915356False. Men are better at everything. The only thing women are useful for is making babies. They're not even good at raising said babies, nor cooking or cleaning or anything like that.
>>223910950TATTERSOULS!
