where can i watch online?

>>223921151
indian-retard.com

>>223921106
Nathan does the thing with his mouth in the trailer thus it's the best movie ever because I am a low IQ retard

>>223921106
We get it, you like capeshit. Many such cases.

Honestly though, why the fuck do normalfags hype EVERYTHING up? Even if it’s not warranted at all.

>>223921106
>filtered by a leaf
Lmao

>>223921503
herd mentality and self-validation reinforced by social media

>>223921106
I'm convinced nobody in any of the threads about this movie has actually seen this movie, because the only discussion I've seen about it has been regarding the things you see in the trailer, and not the crazy tone shift that happens for the remaining 2/3s of the rest of the movie.

Seriously, did we watch the same movie? Like an hour in she goes to jail and then it just turns into a 100% completely different movie. I haven't even seen anybody bring up it's use of AI. Generally speaking I can't stand AI, especially not for creative media like movies- but this was the one single time I can think of where it's use wasn't only justified- it arguably improved the story through it's medium. It was really clever how they used it to make the audience question what if anything they were seeing was actually real. And is anybody going to acknowledge the 4th wall break that happens with Amanda Seyfried's character(?) I put a question mark after that because sometimes it seems like she's just herself, but other times it feels like she's playing a characterized version of herself. And then other times she's playing Elizabeth Holmes, but then other times she's playing herself playing Elizabeth Holmes. By the end it reminded me a lot of Synecdoche, New York where it became unclear where one ended and the next began.

>tl;dr
It's a really great movie, and I'm pretty sure the people here complaining about it haven't seen it

>>223921106
>Unironically watching a 3 hour A24 movie

Seriously, why has this been hyped up so much? Is it just because of that woman's crazy face?

>>223921106
Careful. You're going to upset the shill.

>>223921106
Yeah I don’t really feel like seeing it either, watching 3 hour movies in the theater feels fucking horrible, you’re basically there for 4 hours too and your whole day is gone, if it makes any difference I felt this way about Avatar and other 3 hour movies, I mean it sucks this bitch scammed people but I dunno, think I might pass

why the fuck isn't there a cam out yet

>>223922228
I enjoyed seeing it in an audience with a bunch of people, but honestly for a movie like this a cam would probably be fine. It's mostly just a bunch of super close ups of people's faces while they talk.

the only part where I was kind of happy I saw it on a big screen was when in the second half of the movie there's some kind of trippy special effects that looked pretty cool projected really big, but other than that a camrip seems adequate

so who gets naked in the movie? I saw basedboys say somebody does but they wont say who for some reason

>>223922692
me. I was naked the whole time. I'm even naked right now.

>>223921106
do they show her titties?

>>223921354
It’s worth noting that the last couple of Spider-Man movies have been around two and a half hours long.

>>223922692
>>223922731
no- it's male nudity. there's just a random scene not that far into it where they just show her husband in the shower and it's just kind of weird.

>>223922228
>why the fuck isn't there a cam out yet
One just dropped

https://mega.nz/file/BC90HaiK#_ELuwlFkV1GMUbBhZbQHjfq_JHmoJPy4mFYr7zdIIO0

>>223922783
I fucking knew it, they way they describe it I could tell they tried to trick people into thinking she gets naked and then they see anaked dude instead

File: Spoiler Image (56 KB, 600x337)

56 KB JPG

>people praising as something never seen before, a phenomenon
>it's just a 3 hour long episode of The Rehearsal
Look, I like Nathan for You and the first season of The Rehearsal, but I am tired of glazing media because it's "meta". 99% of the time meta narratives have nothing interesting/new to say. That 1% being...

>>223922966
How is it like The Rehearsal?

>>223921648
No, the people here complaining about it are just incapable of understanding it. They saw it on an entirely surface level
>It's just two people talking in a room!
>Why is he playing Abbott and Costello? This is pointless
>Now they're talking in an office!
>Wtf nothing happened, I don't get it. They went swimming? So what?

File: 1787333351147530.jpg (12 KB, 247x250)

12 KB JPG

>>223922866
fucking finally thanks anon

>>223922220
It's not much of a "theater experience" movie so you're not missing much, you can easily wait for the home release and watch it at your leisure. I do think watching it in one go is good, the contrast between before and after prison is good without giving too much away.

>>223922783
really, really disappointed it wasn’t Nathan

>>223922987
Bringing Amanda Seyfried in to portray both Holmes and seemingly also a semi-fictionalized version of herself is very much in the recent Nathan Fielder playbook.

File: 1763696059259952.png (324 KB, 758x590)

324 KB PNG

>>223921106
>I was waiting for it to be over at the one hour mark

at what point do you turn off a piece of /tv/
live is too short and there is too much entertainment out there for me to sit through something im not eagerly enjoying

>>223923112
I did that with Marty Supreme. Got about an hour and twenty minutes in and decided I wasn’t enjoying it nearly enough to endure another 90 minutes. Never went back to it.

>>223922783
>"We were in the car ride on the way back from the gym and I said to Billy, ‘We will give you some time to shower,’” the filmmaker told GQ. “And Billy responded, ‘Want to film me showering?’”
>Oppenheim added, “I offered to film him in a way that could avoid seeing his genitals, but Billy said he didn’t care about being seen naked.”
lmao

>>223923107
Ok I think it's different because they needed to reenact those scenes and weren't really doing it by choice or a fiction

I passed as soon as I saw the 3 hour runtime

>>223922987
did you see the movie?

>If you liked this movie please tell me one good thing about it because I cannot think of anything.

No one has answered this because no one actually liked it There isn't anything difficult to understand in the film and nothing really subverts your expectations. There is no twist, at all. I think the average person wants to say it's good to appear smart because they didn't "get it" but in reality the movie is insanely shallow and there is no depth to be found.

You can sum up the entire movie like this: Did you know people who are famous for lying are often psychopaths?

>>223922692
Billy is the only one shown full frontal in the film

Daily reminder that this movie will instigate chud seethe and cope because it portrays a kirkfag as cringe and retarded (as if that’s difficult) and also showcases a type of delusion of grandeur that is very prevalent in America.

>>223924342
>Did you know people who are famous for lying are often psychopaths?
whether they even are is the point of the movie. Getting to know these people is the point of the movie.

>>223921106
I thought the movie was quite good and the runtime didnt feel super long until the very end. The cinematography was top notch throughout with really clever use of colour and lighting. The score setting the film to enact like a drama was also quite nice. There are parts of the film that can drag but i think the film using a first act for the house scenes and then the remainder of the film being around Nathan feeling like there were still questions he wanted closure on and the finale being him coming to the door and the closure being just as confusing as the doubts were really well presented.
I also liked that Nathan wasn’t trying to end the film with a finalized opinion to preach to the audience but kept things vague enough for people to question if Elizabeth was being honest, if at any point, during the entire film.

>>223924408
>this movie will instigate chud seethe and cope because it portrays a kirkfag as cringe and retarded
oh wow, that never even occured to me, but now that you mention it, I bet you're right.

that part of the movie just went past me becasuse I was more distracted by the fact he had her power of attorney and the horrific stuff he was doing making AI porn of her and plastering billboards all over los angeles with that picture of her she hated so much it made her brake down. I guess I just thought "oh, yeah- that tracks. A guy that awful probably would be a charlie kirk stan- that checks out" but I bet the average tv poster might feel called out by the inclusion of that detail

You should have watched Wildwood instead. It's at least mildly entertaining and strongly benefits from being seen in a theater vs at home.

>>223924342
>No one has answered this because no one actually liked it
see >>223921648

didn't see the movie, but also didn't even bother to read the thread- that last part you don't see very often. it takes an exceptionally profound type of retardation to pull that off

>>223924449
Nailed it

>>223924449
>but kept things vague enough for people to question if Elizabeth was being honest, if at any point, during the entire film.
I keep going back and forth on whether or not her whole response to watching Who's On First was sincere or not. I just can't decide if she was faking it or not. I have autism myself, so I can understand to some extent how a person might misunderstand a joke or a social cue or something, but what she was doing was something I've never seen before. Its been like 2 days, and I really still can't decide what I think she was doing

It’s a highly intriguing film around manipulation. Billy manipulating (or think he’s manipulating) Elizabeth. Elizabeth manipulating Billy and Nathan. Nathan manipulating the audience through editing. Amanda defending her manipulation because it’s just “acting in a tv show”

the film confronts the viewer with the difficult question of who to trust and the biases we face. Do we think Elizabeth Holmes is a victim of Billy’s controlling nature or is she playing into it and trying to garner sympathy? Does Nathan truly see everything or just what Elizabeth wants him to see? Do WE see everything or just what Nathan wants us to see?

it’s a great film because it asks the questions but doesn’t answer it for us (mostly because there isn’t an answer)

>>223922731
She pops a tit to feed her baby

>>223924598
On the one hand, she clearly understands semantics and the importance of words. She speaks very well and chooses her words wisely.

Do you guys think she was lying about not knowing who Nathan is?

>>223924728
I saw somebody on a different social media site suggest that the timing of the birth's of her children might have been intentional to try and manipulate the court system. They were implying first one was an attempt to postpone her trial, and her second was an attempt to try and get leniency with sentencing. Which obviously sounds crazy on paper, because your first thought is "well that's ridiculous, who would ever do something like that?" Listen, I'm not saying they did- but if there was ever anybody who was going to do something like that- these are the people

>>223924771
Yes. In one of the re-enactments Amanda/Elizabeth brings up how she thinks Nathan would be a good father - referring to The Rehearsal season 1.

>>223924709
> Do we think Elizabeth Holmes is a victim of Billy’s controlling nature or is she playing into it and trying to garner sympathy?
My problem is that I did not care. None of the people are likable they're all psychos so why should I give a shit about the semantics of how they are retarded psychos

I was going to pay to watch this but then I learned the guy who made the pro-pedo Chris Hanson movie produced this.

>>223924736
...and on the other hand, it's maybe one of the most famous and very straight forward/easily understood comedy routines in history. She sat there with a straight face and repeatedly said she had never heard it before, and then she never said she didn't understand. Sort of. More accurately, she actually said the opposite. She did what looks like, a very very poor job of "lying", saying that she understood, but when asked to explain herself, was unable. Not just unable, but unable in the way a child might fold under scrutiny when asked to explain the plot of a book they were supposed to have read for homework but hadn't.

>>223924408
>>223924465
Yeah Kirk haters are fags. These posts prove it

Interesting film. The tonal shift from before and after Holmes goes to prison is pretty jarring. The first half of the movie feels like a legitimate documentary, and the second half feels like, well, a movie. Even Billy seems like he's an acting in the later stages of the film. The argument at the dinner table with Seyfried over Charlie Kirk in particular does not seem to be an organic conversation. Maybe it was just some clever work and lighting that made it feel like a dramatization more than a natural conversation, I dunno.

>>223924813
Did you go into it blind? Did you not know what it was about?

>>223924824
She's not stupid, right? But she also likes to play stupid, right? So why wouldn't she be doing it there? And I think it might look effortless because it is to her.
When she said she's never lied in her adult life, was that a lie? Or did she really believe that she's never said anything untrue on purpose?

>>223924963
>She's not stupid, right?
You say that like it's easy to tell, but I'm of the opinion this movie could have also been titled "The Woman Who's So Stupid You Won't Believe It"

>>223924963
for any normal human being I would be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt

but in the case of Holmes, we KNOW she’s a serial liar. We don’t know factually if she’s lying here so we all hav Erin choose individually if we trust her or not. Personally, based on her history, I choose to not trust her

First half was a well shot a serviceable documentary
The second part is pure kino, if you told me Amanda Seyfried was acting the entire time i'd believe you, if she wasn't I'd believe you. The entire thing is a magic trick, the type Nathan brings up in it, you can tell you are being tricked but you cannot identify exactly how and when.

>>223924598
It’s painfully obvious she’s aware of Wher who is on first was about. She’s a pathological liar. She has been caught lying. She states she has never lied. She also refuses to admit she did nothing wrong. She didn’t admit she knew what it meant because then she can’t pretend she doesn’t understand the intentional ambiguity of what she is saying in regard to Theranos. I deal with pathological liars, grifters, narcissists constantly and this shit is incredibly common. Elizabeth is a badass girl boss running a massive company, an autistic retard who doesn’t understand the world around her (nevermind she got accepted to Stanford) , or being manipulated/controlled by Current Man depending on what narrative is currently most convenient. Most people have principles but for people like Elizabeth the ends justifies the means. Do not fall for their grift.

>>223924774
That happens incredibly commonly. Women in the military are fucking notorious for getting knocked up right before deployment

PREMISE

>>223924963
She's very clearly full of shit. Someone who went to a $35k per year private school, studied Chem. Eng. at Stanford and co-op'd at a bio lab in Singapore is not retarded enough to feign ignorance on their business dealings much less completely decline to acknowledge a joke, likely because she didn't want to be caught in the web by Nathan that she clearly understood the concept of misleading statements.
>>223924871
You've definitely never interacted with entitled rich brats because Billy is that to a T.
>>223924865
Hey I think you got a mosquito bite on your neck bud. Best get that sorted out.

>>223921648
Saw it opening night. Fascinating movie and one of the best documentaries I've ever seen. Fielder was born to make this and I doubt he'll ever top it.

>>223921106
I don't mind the hate threads because it's perfect bait material. Here's your (You)

>>223924871
Billy is an absolute whack job. He’s a trust fund Mormon in a relationship with a grifter 7 years older than him trying to make a startup on a subject he has no formal education in with his wagon hitched to one of the most famous con artists of the 21st century. The AI Elizabeth at the table and all the creepy pets just cements how nuts this dude is. The decision not to marry her is intentional though. The millions in restitution she owes could land on him if they comingled their finances. Elizabeth can continue to pretend she’s poor while married to this trust fund kiddo running a fake business in an empty warehouse and wework cubicle

>>223924963
The responses in this thread really highlights what privileged lives some of you lead that you don’t commonly encounter people like this. She’s a predator. Do not believe her lies. She does not once ever admit something that makes her look bad. Imagine sinking a massive company with fraud and offering no insight on how you failed when you literally helmed the company

>>223921106
don't bother there is really nothing to learn about in this documentary

>>223925174
>Fielder was born to make this and I doubt he'll ever top it.
normally the cynical /tv/ poster in me would say something shitty and sarcastic, but honestly I don't think you're being that hyperbolic. it genuinely was pretty engaging. I know people say this all the time and don't mean it, but I honestly think I'm going to be thinking about this movie for a long time

People who adopt lying and deception as a strategy eventually erode their cognitive circuits. One of the major flaws with deception is that the deceiver themself run a risk of revealing their own lies if they can't keep track. Most liars are lazy, so the effort of keeping track is too much for them.

So, you get a unique cognitive "adaptation" in which the persons brain will ignore or rewrite certain parts of reality, and then delete any connection to the creation.
In other words, they quite literally fabricate ALTERNATE versions of events that happen, and then forget the REAL version of events.

This is what happened to my mom. She got raped as a kid and never wanted to conquer the trauma, I think because she believed if she was always damaged, if gave her license to do whatever she wanted.
Over time when I started teaching myself about basic psychology (it was a sink or swim mentality) she basically got angry whenever I tried to share any of it with her
Took me years to realize she's just using her trauma as an excuse to do what she wants, which means that if she wasn't traumatized, she'd be causing a lot more trouble to public trust.
Right now I'm trying to figure out how to escape, but like any career manipulator, she's really wrapped her life around mine in a way that makes it hard to separate, due to her desire to always keep my close

The worst part is, she very clear has sexual feelings for me, and even worse, she refuses to do anything other than try to "tempt" some kind of chance encounter with me. She won't read a Bible, she won't learn about biology. All she wants to do it seems is live with me in some weird fantasy world where society isn't about to collapse.
Its really sick shit
I used to feel sorry for her, but doesn't the spider want it's prey to just give up and be eaten?

>>223925218
I get the feeling it's just Fielders attempt to help senationalize the investigation of lies.
A certain group of people knows that once you sensationalize something, it get placed up on the shelf culturally.

>>223925358
In the case of her husband (boyfriend?) Billy, I don't think much effort was needed to sensationalize his behavior. His natural behavior was already so unhinged I'm not sure it would have been possible to parody

>>223922897
She does show her nipple when she's breastfeeding her baby

>>223921106
Can't wait for this to hit streaming

>>223921106
>another "hot take" on popular culture to draw engagement
yawn.

>>223925465
you're confused

>>223925390
>don't think much effort was needed to sensationalize his behavior
Oh so I guess they didn't have to trickily edit things to manipulate events as much with his stuff

>>223925418
That's where the fraud conviction comes in. She went around for years saying things that any reasonable person would understand to mean her technology DID work. And it absolutely didn't. What she attempts to argue in the movie is that she was just unclear, and it was all a misunderstanding, and what she *meant* was that although her technology didn't currently do any/all of the things she was suggesting, it COULD ONE DAY. And that's why Nathan sat her down to make her watch Who's On First and then had her try to explain what the joke in it was. Because if she could understand the joke of Who's On First, then she could understand why she was convicted of fraud, because they're essentially the same thing.

So if you believe she didn't understand who's on first is really at the core of whether you believe she was intentionally lying to her investors/the public at large, which is one of the central questions of the film

File: n4u.jpg (43 KB, 825x413)

43 KB JPG

>>223921106
It's compelling how mysterious everything is. Nathan doing this by choice would be whatever, but the fact she asked him changes everything

>>223925498
This is essentially reducing it to
>does a Scorpion understand that its poison will kill you?

As time progresses, it will be more and more revealed that MANY people are just animals imitating the very few civilized people, and that they have no real understanding

It's like if you found a zipper on any extant human, pulled it down, and found a rhesus monkey inside blinking absentmindedly?

>>223925498
I think she's a great liar. She knows how to setup her persona.

>>223921106
Already semi-familiar with this case from reading/watching things about it years ago
This doc feels like its catered to people who have never heard of her case before

>>223922897
To be fair it is a nice cock

File: amandaseyfried.jpg (79 KB, 780x438)

79 KB JPG

...and don't get me started on this bitch. everything about her seems suspicious and I'm pretty sure that's just her acting. Look at this answer she gives when asked about the movie- it's pure concentrated Elizabeth Holmes, down to the word choices and the misdirection

https://youtube.com/shorts/zECXEG7XCok?si=dJCpnk72lOWqLO_f

File: Screenshot_20261025-152749~2.jpg (135 KB, 1596x1066)

135 KB JPG

>Are you really a Charlie Kirk fan? *giggle*
>Y-yeah.. yeah I am!
>Well I think he's a Fucking Pussy

Based Amanda
Oscar in the bag

File: IMG_8022.jpg (136 KB, 1179x876)

136 KB JPG

>Shoot a whole documentary
>your subjects just acted retarded and stonewalled you the whole time
>it’s boring as shit, basically unwatchable
>“better pull out some of my ‘hyper-detailed recreation and putting people in awkward situations while I act oblivious’ schtick to try and salvage this thing”
>it’s hailed as a masterpiece

>>223925577
aww! did somebody get a little triggered?

>>223925577
I audibly kek'd because he was

>>223925335
This is just like one of my animes!

>>223925498
But she did understand the joke.

>"Elizabeth do you understand why this is funny?"
>"I don't know."

She acknowledges the humor comes from the guy on third base being named "I don't know".

>>223925577
my chud slayer queen

>>223925593
Investors were clearly being fed lies. That being said they were completely retarded for not consulting someone with an actual medical/biotech background. This entire device was laughably ill conceived, both in the engineering impossibility of it was trying to do and that it wasn’t addressing any real problem

File: ewanyafriends.jpg (29 KB, 736x306)

29 KB JPG

>>223925653
I can see how you'd think that, but that wasn't her, that was actually an actor Nathan had reenacting her role. I believe the actor's name was Dun Heir

>>223926212
>GUYS IRREVERENCE CULTURE WILL NOW SAVE YOU (even though it caused these issues) BUT PLEASE RECOGNIZE ME AND ADMIRE ME FIRST

>>223921106
Did you at least put your phone down while watching it?

I can't believe they really made the title of the film a pun about how her boyfriend shows is dick in the first 30 minutes

DO YOU GET IT? HE'S AUTISTIC BUT HE'S ALSO A NORMALFAG! HE PLAYS THE FOOL BUT HE'S ACTUALLY SUPER DUPER CLEVER!

>>223926662
what?

genuinely what?

I heard someone say that this movie is essentially a rorschach test- everybody walks away with a completely different idea of what they think was going on and who they think were bad/good, but even for me this is a new one

>>223921106
Needed more explosions and monsters

>>223926758
NATHAN FIELDER'S ENTIRE CAREER IS BASED UPON LARPING AUTISM

>>223926758
That’s just your standard bread and butter chuddy’s first ironic shitpost.

>>223926758
It’s really not a rorshach test. It just shows what people are privileged naive rubes. Elizabeth Holme’s is a pathological liar and a grifter. Full stop. It’s not that deep.

>>223921106
You have to understand the Nathan Felder spam is coming from bot accounts. Don't watch this garbage.

>>223926880
but that's what makes it such an effective rorschach test- look at the conviction with which you responded. there isn't a doubt in your mind about what you just said, you're not guessing, you "know". You "know" the truth. And you don't, but the fact you believe what you believe, and with such strength of conviction says so many things about you as a person and how you see the world and the people in it. Someone else may come along that will say with the exact same conviction that they know she was being manipulated and taken advantage of. They may even regard you with the same level of pity or disdain, or whatever it is you're describing that you feel for the people that don't see it your way.

That's why it's a good rorschach test.

>>223926758

don't interact with the animals in exhibit

>>223926962
I have a medical degree. My sister went to Stanford and was in social circles with this lady in Silicon Valley. Anyone trying to say this wasn’t a massive grift is a naive fool with low information. Reddit is elsewhere.

>>223927071
you're really just further making my point for me with the way you continue to double and triple down. I was watching a Q&A session after an early screening with Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim on youtube and they said they originally didn't think there was anything really there as far as subject matter goes after the first few days of shooting and were considering pulling the plug, but in their discussion sessions at the end of the day none of them, not lance, not nathan, not any of the crew could come to an a consensus on what they agreed actually was happening. And that's when they knew they had a movie.

that's the point- it's a very effective rorschach test

>>223923164
he’s literally me

>>223926212
>the last thing a preteen Palestinian girl sees before she is raped to death and eaten

>>223927715
Isn't Nathan pretty outspoken about his support for Gaza?

>>223928052
Not at all, but you should watch Episode 5 of The Rehearsal season 1. It pokes fun at how it feels being a jew and forced to make some statement on Israel/hamas.

File: IMG_7096.gif (444 KB, 200x200)

444 KB GIF

>>223927214
Nathan (and Lance) are trying to sell a product. By Nathan’s own admission he doesn’t understand biotech and wasn’t sure why Elizabeth picked him (spoilers: the latter is related to the former). By contrast, I am the type of person someone like Elizabeth would pay a consultation fee to and I would quickly tell her the myriad of issues the theranos tech was dealing with. Elizabeth consciously ignored warnings from her close employees that the tech was not viable (to the point she helped chase them out), obtained machines from rival companies to help create the illusion her machine worked, altered financial reports to deceive investors and partners, and did all sorts of shenanigans to keep the FDA/regulators away as long as possible. There is no universe Elizabeth was not aware of what was going on in her company . This might seem much more ambiguous for people who dont understand business, biotech, fda approval, etc. Elizabeth wanted to do this documentary to rehab her image and perhaps make some money. Her claims she never sold a stock is also deceitful because she exercised stock options thst left her 25 million in debt to Theranos, in addition she had common stock so if she tried to sell those her preferred stock owners would get the chance to sell off theirs first wiping her, and her company, out. I deal with people like her on a daily basis. There is really nothing remarkable about her deceit other than the fact the people she duped happened to be rich and powerful (although again, totally ignorant of this field and overly eager to hop on a unicorn stock). The only divide in people watching this are people who can see the bullshit and useful idiots buying their poor attempt at propaganda

File: IMG_0823.gif (1.91 MB, 600x338)

1.91 MB GIF

>>223921155

>>223925603
Basically this

>>223925603
You didn't see the movie

>>223921503
"Every new somewhat artsy movie out is the greatest movie ever" is a marketing tactic and normalfags fall for it every time

>>223921503
>>223921552
Related, the normie tic of always being sure to say Nathan Fielder's full name every time they talk about Nathan Fielder in this movie is irritating. So that you know they're intimately familiar with the famous and esteemed comedian-filmmaker Nathan Fielder (who they definitely had not forgotten about until just now since seeing a few Nathan For You clips 10 years ago).

I almost went into design. A field that specializes in fooling people. I think this film will illuminate this for the average person.

>>223929781
Neat

I haven't seen anyone discuss how in the end where he's recounting the prison visit the Elizabeth actress questions his choice of words when he's recollecting, mirroring the earlier scene where he chastised Elizabeth for her choice of words in how the machine can perform any test. There's also the ending text about the NYT writer refusing to give proof about Holmes quote. Ultimately I think one of the themes is about twisting and being unsure of words. It was great but I wanted more of Nathans confrontational awkwardness like the "no you don't" scene.

I feel bad for anon who don't understand Nathan only creates kino or lack the mind to understand it.

>>223929844
Imagine if Nathan created a doc about Wall Street and its fakery and crashed the world economy. Wouldn't that be a fun film?

>>223921106
>midwit
>contrarian
pick one

>>223921106
10/10 Mean Girls friendship simulator

>>223921106
I just watched it and I didn't particularly like it. I don't care about Nathan's meta art piece about how we are all liars, actually. The only interesting part is how Elizabeth duped investors out of $9 billion, and that part is entirely neglected.

>>223930351
What are your thoughts on Charlie Kirk?

>>223929844
This is why everyone is sucking off this mediocre movie so hard. They're too afraid to criticize it and look "cringe" for not being in on the joke if it turns out that was Fielder's intent

>>223930384
I don't know who that is, I don't pay attention to burgertown's culture wars.

>>223921106
We already had a documentary about her
its not that interesting

elisibeth holmes is a victim of mk ultra

>>223930477
Sure thing bud.

File: Into_the_Wild_(2007_film_(...).png (141 KB, 260x385)

141 KB PNG

>>223921106
That was genuinely the most boring piece of shit movie I have ever seen in my life. Turned it off after 25 minutes. A film for wrorthless cunts made by worthless cunts about a worthless cunt. But also insurrably pretentious and boring.

>>223921503
What's worse is hipsters who hate a movie just because its hyped. Many such cases ITT.

>>223921552
>herd mentality
So much shit boils down to this. It really only is high T men and autismos who are free to think for themselves.

>>223921106
This is going to get to #1 on every aggregated film chart there is. Every future aspiring movie watcher will have to contend with the opinion of this being the best movie ever made, like we did with The Godfather, Citizen Kane, or 2001. Call me an old grump, but this overwhelming hype makes me prejudiced against it.

>>223930885
Did Elizabeth Holmes write this post? Am I actually Amanda Seyfried???

slow down, buddy. get a grip

Imagine calling a film 10/10 because the soundtrack is a facsimile of Aphex Twin's selected ambient works 2

the tl;dr is she's a psychopath, that's it, but it's pretty cool seeing a complete psycho being herself in a cage

>I accidentally misspoke one word and misrepresented the capability of my cutting edge technology and everyone just gave me a billion dollars, oopsie poopsie

If you just step back for a second it's obvious she is full of shit. But the level of psychopathy she operates is actually ring 0, it's impressive to see. It's completely natural for her, no active thought necessary.

File: aphex twin fans.gif (2.33 MB, 360x514)

2.33 MB GIF

>>223931218

>>223929949
Yes.

>>223921648
>It's a really great movie
it was fine as documentaries go, i was entertained most of the way through but got kind of bored during the mockumentary since i stopped caring that Nathan got played

>>223922866
the damn mega transfer quota is cucking me

File: 1785539703851274.png (543 KB, 870x500)

543 KB PNG

I thought she was cute in it.

I wasn't happy with my wife Amanda for getting all defensive when her slop movie got called out for being tabloid horseshit.

>>223928110
>altered financial reports to deceive investors and partners
Well her dad did work for an Enron affiliate company and used Enron's links with the GOP to get into political bureaucracy. So yeah, Elizabeth definitely learned well from her dad on GTFOing fraud companies before they collapse while reaping the rewards. Sadly she forgot the "timing part."

>>223933365
Feds don't prosecute fraud ever anyway. It's a big club etc

>>223924871
Remember it's a conversation between two dipshit twitter warriors, one is a celebrity and the other is a fucked up cokehead, it felt believable to me

I like the scene where Nathan explains to Elizabeth Holmes how Theranos could've been a Nathan for You sketch. Honestly I ship them.

>>223922866
Skimmed through it. Its just a bunch of people talking. I don't care enough about this lady to sit through 3 hours of talking.

>>223932768
It's funny how she got criticized for The Dropout when it's more sympathetic to Liz than You Can See Everything is

File: Spoiler Image (1.03 MB, 1579x1010)

1.03 MB PNG

>>223921106
What a waste of fucking time. Fuck this hack.

>>223934032
>brushing your teeth in the shower
Do people really do this?

I just found a camrip version available and I'm 5 mins in, what did I think about it?

>>223934056
you're me and so getting drawn in quickly and only pausing to make sure I have the right opinion on /tv/

>>223927715
Lucky girl

>>223934043
Yes. Pretty much my entire life. I'm more surprised normies don't do it

>>223934032
>White bod
>Black dick

Really gets the nog noggin....>>2239341

>>223922966
>99% of the time meta narratives have nothing interesting/new to say
Digger had NOTHING to say

>>223931425
>Nathan got played

You do understand that Nathan and Oppenheim were also in charge of editing the movie, right? You’re not seeing a live feed.

>>223934120
You're me and I'm indeed you. I'm 10 mins in on small window while browsing /TV/ Still no opinion made. No pausing tho

>You're an attractive man

Nathan going for that bussy I see

>>223921106
>pathological liar puts on a show for Nathan fielder who is feeling especially "Filmmaker"y
I'm good thanks

I'm 30 mins ins, what did I think of it?

>>223921503
Dude, it's THE Nathan Felder. From Comedy Central and HBO. It's a mind fuck, let me tell you. Mind. fucking. blown. Wow.

>>223934377
You’re thinking about making dumb posts on 4chan and are not focused at all.

>>223929737
jesus you are fucking autistic lol

>>223934183
you're I mean I'm watching on my phone now

Why is this bitch pretending she doesn't understand who's on first

>>223934565
Yeah but am I wrong though?

>>223934623
Her defense mechanism is to lie about everything even if it makes no sense or makes her look dumb. She obviously understood where he was going when he brought it up but didn't wanna have to acknowledge it.

>>223921106
I fucking knew it.

>>223921106
In all seriousness, I don't know how anyone could be interested enough in this woman to watch a documentary about her exploits.

>>223921106
It was interesting. No need to see it in theaters you can wait unless you're a huge Nathan fan. I thought Amanda seemed drunk as fuck a few times and that made me laugh.

>>223934684
The dropout was kino and the whore makes my peepee tingle

>>223934692
The camrip has been decent so far

I really wanted to see her fully naked, including the anus and clitoris in 4k, but she never got naked in this movie at all. Extremely gay and faggy.

Is Nathan gonna clap them cheeks give it to me straight

>>223934723
It's even got people walking into frame in the theater. That's the good shit aww yeah

>>223934579
I should stop pausing so I and I can watch it at the same time

>>223934792
Only 2 niggies did that in the first 3 mins and then it has been fine

>>223934817
And me and you.

>>223925034
Nathan gave away the entire point of the film by first bringing up whose on first and then after the “twist” by bringing up the David Blaine “trick” of not actually doing a magic trick but rather an extreme act of pushing his mind and body to the extreme (pretending to stab himself with an ice pick by actually stabbing himself with an ice pick) all the while the audience thinks they ARE watching a trick because You Can See Everything and why would a sane person Stan themselves over a trick

>>223934674
I'm OP I was joking lol it's great

I'm one hour in, what did I think about it?

>>223922866
Strong mommy feet a minute in

It's losing me, ain't gonna lie

>>223935230
Shut the fuck up and stop posting adhd retard

>>223935244
Many mes are watching right now, I can't let myselves down

Nathan fielder isn't funny

>>223921648
Sounds confusing and annoying. I went to watch Street Fighter and busted a load in my popcorn bucket.

>>223935362
Because the /retvit/ hyped this shit so much I watched Nathan for You clips and the Rehearsal pilot. Extremely underwhelming. Also the rehearsal was ridiculously fake/scripted

IM A CHICK, WATCHING A CHICK WATCHING A CHICK ACTING LIKE THAT OTHER CHICK

Bravo Fielder I love you

So it's Fielder really gonna try to shoehorn in sexual tension with every women around him?

I'm 90 mins in, what did I think about it?

>>223935512
Well yeah he’s one of us.

I keep hearing people talk about how smart Elizabeth is. I really don't think she is pretending to be a retard. I understand that her lying technique is to always say nothing of substance, but even when she is trying to be smart on the phone, she sounds like a retard. Even Billy isnt even that smart. We all just assume these people are extremely calculating and intelligent. Elizabeth went to Stanford and Billy went to MIT. We must remember that both of them are just rich kids that probably got into college only because of their parents. I have never known many woman to be that calculating. She was clearly trying to be evasive enough because any answer implicates her legally. I also think she chooses men that are control freaks and is happy to let them control every aspect of her life. Her old partner, Sunny, was definitely doing the same thing Billy is doing now. I think they realize that Elizabeth is actually very personable despite being very odd looking. She has a way of softening people and making them feel at ease.

>>223935412
What do you consider to be more funny than Nathan Fielder shows?

>>223935546
I think he's a normie or borderline chad (he's on Hollywood ffs) roleplaying as a frogposter. I feel culturally appropiated

>>223935575
Anything Mike Judge has done

>>223935635
Beevis and Butthead?

>>223935653
That's one of his worst ones actually. KOTH and Silicone Valley are at the top

>>223935667
I like Mike Judge, but he was never funny enough to me to have me in stitches laughing. He was always more of a chuckle kind of guy. Honestly, if you never thought the finale of Nathan for You was funny, I don't know if he could ever make you laugh.

>>223934692
I'm pretty sure everyone had been drinking in the Charlie Kirk scene

Do you guys think Amanda Seyfried realizes how bad the movie makes her look?

>>223935244
don't yell at me them I'll do it himself

>>223935767
How so

>>223935767
Why? Shes a chick playing a chick who was playing another chick

>>223935768
Why would I be so rude to myself

>>223935822
That's what you're saying! :D

>>223935798
You just have to step inside the shoes of a literal retard to understand

>>223934032
>reverse image search
>just this thread
so who is this?

>>223935798
Because she spends the whole film using it as an opportunity to keep playing/researching a character that got her a lot of attention. You even see how insulting her portrayal of Elizabeth is when Amanda watches Elizabeth watch The Dropout. Amanda cringes at her own performance. She goes "undercover" and acts fake with Elizabeth's husband and kids with the intention of having them divorce. So when Elizabeth claims that Amanda's portrayal of her damaged her reputation, Amanda gets defensive and starts coping hard. She can't acknowledge that her celebrated pretend version of Elizabeth was malicious. Amanda starts attacking Nathan when he perceives their last meeting as genuine when even Nathan concedes that Billy and Elizabeth did appear to have genuine love for each other. You realize she can't even see Elizabeth as a real person. It shows a dark side of what actors think. Amanda believes she actually portrayed Elizabeth accurately.

>>223935887
Nathan Fielder’s cock

>>223934182
yes and im saying i was enteretained enough until the dramatization, they thought it was clever basically making 2 movies which i thought it was stupid and made the whole thing, whatever nathan/lance/elizabeth/amanda/billy were trying to accomplish boring af

>>223934182


> He didnt realize that there was another layer to the flick

>>223935887
>>223935953
I'm almost 2 hours in and no cock has been shown yet. Am I being gaslighted?

>>223935947
What a good movie

I'm 2,5 hours in and I unironically need to stop for a 3 hours appointment, what did I think of it?

>>223933446
It gets a lot nastier when you start fucking with people’s medical tests and raising the ire of the FDA and other letter agencies.

>>223935887
its literally from the mega link
>>223922866

>>223934623
>”why is this pathological liar lying right now?”

Truly a mystery

We did it /tv/ we marathoned the last 5 mins at the hospital reception!

So... What did I think about it?

I wasnt familiar with her employee who killed himself after being Subpoenaed for a patent lawsuit. I think that made it more interesting since there was more, moral at least, ambiguity. Reading about his story however oh yeah shes full of shit. Her husband might be rat fucking her a bit now that shes in jail and has less power to curb his obvious cokefueled tech bro influences but she 100% is knowing and willing participant in everything upto that point.
Still a good watch, I think its fun how Nathan tries to pic them apart and lets them sit in a awkward silence. Him eventually snapping a few times got a laugh to.
"No you dont!"

>>223921648
This post was AI generated. People who can't detect that need to take more Tylenol.

So that was the 300 iq spoiler the rabbit was praising? That Seyfriend is involved?

Meh

>>223921648
AI use beyond her avatar?

>4th wall break
I might need to see this again I don’t know if I picked up on this.

Alien vs Predator

So what great revelation did we get from this flick that warrants an all time best rating on 'boxd?

>the convicted fraudster... pretends to be autistic to feign ignorance
>her husband... is le bad (maybe the patriarchy is to blame???)
>actors... also play pretend and have biases
>nathan... might also be lying to you because the psycho flirted with him a bit

woah bro...

>>223922220
It’s definitely a movie you can watch at home and break into pieces. It would probably have worked better ‘narratively’ as a miniseries in my opinion.

File: 4f1.jpg (44 KB, 600x558)

44 KB JPG

she's already laying the groundwork to play the helpless waif, hitting the cameras with "Billy has his own way of doing things" the second his money grabs are questioned.

the guy probably thinks he's the ultimate alpha protecting his misunderstood genius, going in front of a camera bragging about having total power of attorney, ghostwriting unhinged tweets, and cutting secret profit deals while making vague threats - the exact coercive control defense she'll use in the inevitable sequel.

>>223940669
What great revelation do we get from The Shining? It's a story, not a math problem.

>>223941589
>more Holmeskino
Can't wait

File: IMG_8937.jpg (42 KB, 1024x569)

42 KB JPG

>>223928140
Redeemed

>>223941589
Except for the most brain rotted Redditors this won’t work. She is a pariah. Only an absolute retard would invest money with her now

>>223921648
It was excellent desu. The music was really good too

Why did nathan leave so much dead air in this documentary?
Did we get scammed?

>>223934032
Thought people said he has a huge dong, looks about average to me.

>>223941614
I don't like The Shining either

>>223941835
never underestimate the sheer brainrot of startup techbro culture. even i believe the actual tech will be viable in a 10-5 year span. in that niche, minimum viable products are just accepted testing grounds, and a 90% r&d failure rate is just the standard cost of doing business.

just look at Elon, how many rockets did he blow before he started shitting up the orbit with Starlinks? no matter how toxic she is right now, there will absolutely be buyers. honest to god, looking at how that industry operates, i'm confused why she even got charged and jailed.

File: 1580566691407.jpg (50 KB, 366x351)

50 KB JPG

>>223934032
YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING

Does the movie bring the audience who isn't familiar with the whole scandal up to speed?

>>223921552
>self-validation reinforced
you're just saying words
i agree though

>>223944742
it does miss a lot of shit, especially how she completely fucked over Sunny Balwani at the end. i think it's better that way. if it tried to explain everything it'd just be bogged down with way too much exposition. and i don't think all that extra drama isn't that important overall, if the movie just gives people a blueprint on how to recognize predators, it did its job.

>>223921106
most shilled film ever on /tv/