I'm not trying to sound like a prude or anything, but what even was the point? In the movie's defense I suspect her husband insisted they put it in, because it honestly seems like the kind of thing he'd do
>>223922211Did they show her bleached butthole too?
>>223922233I will watch the film if someone can confirm
>>223922211> I suspect her husband insisted they put it in, because it honestly seems like the kind of thing he'd doThat's exactly what happened. They're trying to appear transparent and genuine to the point where they do insane stunts like this instead of being actually transparent and genuine. Because they're crazy. It's manipulative theater from people who have no interest in being actually genuine.
>>223922256I do think there's a case to be made that she's so mentally fucked up she can only be partially held responsible for what she did though. Like the thing with Who's On First- I'm not sure that was an act. I think she might legitimately be so autistic that she genuinely doesn't understand one of the most well known and straight forward comedy routines in modern history. So, while I do agree both she and her husband are definitely manipulators- I think she's just as susceptible to being manipulated herself. also the eggs thing. wtf was that? I just see that as more evidence of her being mentally unwell, to the point where I question how responsible we can really hold her
>>223922211i could hardly believe the husband and wife were real people. both them niggas schizto af
>>223922307>the eggs thingdid she eat all of them?
>>223922307>I just see that as more evidence of her being mentally unwell, to the point where I question how responsible we can really hold herShe got you, bro
>titled You Can See Everything>OP: AAAAAHHHHHHHHH
>>223923859Now that you mention it, I don't think they ever actually showed it. They just kept cutting back and forth to her stirring a disgusting bowl of raw egg yolks and saying she was "making scrambled eggs", but I don't think we ever see her eat them
