this came out?

>>223926318
>we caused... Jan 6...

>>223926318
Did Mark Zuckerberg bribe the theater owners not to show it?

>>223926318
Why the fuck wasn't this to streaming only? Even /tv/ posters had the foresight to predict this unnecessary slop would flop.

>>223926318
>we have to make a sequel to a movie that defined a generation and is still relevant today around its talks of corporate greed, technological development, social issues, and ideas related to ownership.
>LET'S DO JANUARY SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIX REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCK DRUMFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Sony and Sorkin truly deserves to fail

>>223926318
how many directors are going to still give him a chance? he already has a reputation of being difficult to work with because of his method process and now he's been attached to a few huge flops.

>>223926579
My theory is that this was initially intended to be a streaming movie but Zuck paid for it to be distributed in theatres so that it could be promptly pulled and labeled a failure. Same strategy as the Musk film.

The Social Network was fucking kino and already showed Zuckerberg is a dumb dickhead. Him and Facebook are just memes at this point, it doesn’t matter if Facebook propagated some shit what matters is that retards were dumb enough to follow it. Make a character study on how retarded boomers are.

>>223926652
six seven
still voting dsa btw

>boomers when the general public doesn't care about yet another imitation of All the President's Men but *modern*
When will they learn that they've destroyed the public's trust? No one gives a shit about this because it's clear nothing changed.
>a huge scandal was exposed showing the way facebook is purposefully inciting radicalisation
>okay? did anyone go to jail? were laws passed to curb social media's ability to manipulate people?
>well no but there was an inconvenient fine and facebook weren't happy

JANUARY 6TH WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT HISTORICAL EVENT SINCE PEARL HARBOR

He should've made a movie about Sam Altman

>>223926707
>already showed
It was all made up by Sorkin.

>>223926318
I'm just going to pretend that this doesn't exist.
>t. Social Network is my favourite movie

>>223927107
This. I love Mark Zuckerberg. I use Meta's great new Muse SI agent to manage my life.

>>223926318
This movie's premise is that Facebook is evil because it DOESN'T censor people enough.
The director should be drawn and quartered and the film itself should be considered an attack on the United States.

>>223926556
No? It fucking suck and no one want to watch it.

>>223926318
Only boomer/Xer idiots like Sorkin even give a fuck about Facebook anymore, same for Jan 6, this movie was made for a literal empty audience

>>223928366
Yep it was made for the MSNBC audience, which is just too niche of a market for the film's budget.

>>223928302
>This movie's premise is that Facebook is evil because it DOESN'T censor people enough
rightoids aren't people and their hate speech deserves to be censored

>>223926318
Is that the guy from Billions who's on an enternal quest to prove he has good genes through peer acceptance?

It's like if they sincerely made a movie about how le shocking and irresponsible everyone making Harry Potter media was because it was exposing kids to Satanic witchcraft. Boring and dumb premise for old farts

File: Mikey_Madison_at_the_2024(...).jpg (1.34 MB, 1405x1920)

1.34 MB JPG

>>223926318
>win oscar
>immediately torpedo your career
This happens so often, is winning oscars a curse or are these people just stupid?

>>223926318
For sureskiis, it's terrible

>>223926318
Seems more like a streaming show than a major release flick

>>223926679
So Musk paid for that too lmao cope

>>223929631
Enjoy getting bashed on a curb after the red wave tranny

>>223926679
Wow truly a diabolical villain. No wonder he orchestrated the capture of the capital on that grim day in history.

File: black panthers march on c(...).jpg (183 KB, 1200x829)

183 KB JPG

Nothing even happened. They took some selfies and aimlessly wandered around then just went home. Modern politicians would shit and piss and cum in their diapers if this happened today.

>>223926579
it's even more necessary than social network was. But sorkin is a horrible director. With Fincher or Danny Boyle directing, this would very likely be a hit

>>223930543
Didn't antifa do something similar but much more violent and everyone just pretends it never happened because those fascists are the "good guys"?

>>223930583
>similar
Yes

>much more violent
Ehh

They launched an insurrection to storm into the Capitol Rotunda and physically prevent the Senate from confirming Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court but the Capitol police didn't open fire and just arrested everyone for 24 hours because the mob was led by Chuck Schumer's niece Amy

File: Untitled.jpg (56 KB, 686x320)

56 KB JPG

>Fincher didn't return
>Eisenberg didn't return
>Trent Reznor didn't return

>Sorkin returned and figured he could replace all of them

Jan 6th was a non-event. A bunch of low-IQ boomers went on a tour of the Capitol and some REALLY retarded people got themselves deservedly fragged. America goes to the dogs under Biden or Trump, it's all the same.

>>223930642
Oh its supposed to be a direct sequel? With all the new cast I assumed it was a totally different thing. How retarded

File: wall-street-journal_pulit(...).jpg (327 KB, 1416x944)

327 KB JPG

You know what cracks me up about the movie?
Everyone involved in the story is jewish/white so Sorkin invented a bunch of new black people for fictional roles

>black woman that's Zuckerberg's lawyer
>black guy that's editor of the Wall Street Journal

Also lol @ the blonde down syndrome chick from Mr. Robot who literally went "I used to be a progressive democrat feminist but then I became a nazi white supremacist because I use facebook" like wtf

>>223930612
So it was party approved violence like the blm riots. Brownshirts gonna Brownshirt I guess.

>>223929885
Oscars are teetering on meaningless tokens for whatever movie the modern film industry deems necessary for the culture and not through actual talent or skill

>>223930742
I'm not even gonna say it's always been that way
But it's been that way for almost 20 years now

>>223926556
>Did Mark Zuckerberg bribe the theater owners not to show it?

No it was just an awful movie. It was also very outdated. The movie was all about "fake news" being posted on social media.

But we already live in the modern age of AI with fake stuff posted everywhere.

It felt like the movie was permanently stuck in 2017.

>>223930797
censorship good, only trust news from party approved sources, never check multiple sources, everything else is "misinformation", and don't you dare ask any questions.

>>223926318

thank fucking god. it's been over 10 years and these faggots still want to act like zuckerberg not censoring his site is the greatest crime he ever committed

Have literally any movies released this year been successful? I know Street Fighter and Digger were flops, that Brad Pitt movie with the dog didn't exactly make any splashes. The only films that seem to be be hits nowadays are Marvel, animated garbage for kids and stuff by Nolan

>>223926556
It was made by a boomer who thinks facebook is important in 2026

>>223926707
>Make a character study on how retarded boomers are.
This would be more interesting. A movie about how boomers believe anything the media tells them.

>>223928302
This was the way I felt. The movie is anti-human and thinks anyone that doesn't share its political beliefs is stupid, brainwashed, or evil. It's deeply, profoundly hateful and I'm relieved nobody paid any attention to it.

>>223929885
they don't give Oscars to people because they're good at acting anon

>>223926318
Nobody saw the movie that nobody asked for. Shame since Jeremy Strong is a great actor and he deserves better scripts.

>>223930580
it's about how facebook put more statistical weight on reshares than likes
it's a movie about nothing

>>223926318
Woke vs Chud shit aside, its obvious the people who arent completely retarded are waking up to how propaganda is in all media

File: IMG_1784.jpg (324 KB, 1536x2048)

324 KB JPG

>>223931212
> A movie about how boomers believe anything the media tells them.
They made it 50 years ago.

>>223931149
the literal highest grossing domestically movie of all time came out less than six months ago

>>223931350
Even more apropos to make a sequel to it now.

>>223926679
Musk was more likely released in theaters because they want it to qualify for the Oscar for Best Documentary. Which it couldn't do if it released in any other better more digestible format

>>223931149

Obsession, Backrooms, Michael and Project Hail Mary were all big films at the beginning of the year. Summer was mostly Oddysey and Spider-‘Man. I think most normies are saving their money for the one two punch of Dune and Doomsday in December. Since the economy sucks, and everything comes on streaming within a month, only BIG films are worth going to see now.

-T. normie

File: 568899-568786_fifthelemen(...).png (232 KB, 602x536)

232 KB PNG

>>223926318
>Sorkin thinking he is as good of a director as David Fincher

>>223931371
they already did it's Eddington

>>223926652
>>LET'S DO JANUARY SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIX
I genuinely had to check if you ware not shitposting.

>>223931163
to be fair Meta is much bigger than just FB now

>>223931628
the Sorkin type, who exists all over this land, truly believes that Jan 6 was nearly the end of America's very existence

>>223926318
The first one was good cause of Fincher. This kne feel pointless because its not like Facebooks story is even done, if dems win the midterms they are gonna start investigations in all this big corpos. The climax of this movie was some report almost no one read.

>>223926318
Was Jesse Heisenberg involved in this?

>>223931748
>if dems win the midterms they are gonna start investigations in all this big corpos.
if and when that happens, I think this movie wanted credit for it happening so that's why it came out first

>>223928302
I love how the movie rekts itself by having a scene where the reporter openly states that even in a democracy, there are people who shouldn't have a voice.

I would love to ask that faggot Sorkin to explain who is supposed to do the selection of the special ones that do deserve a voice.

>>223931359
Didn't it sale like 30% less tickets than the Tobey ones though?

>>223926709
More like the Dick Sucking Alliance lol

>>223926318
Now they can bring Digger back

>>223931359
Yeah Marvel slop. I don't consider those movies and I don't consider the creatures that go to watch them as people. I'm talking about actual films

File: 1792047290100914.jpg (106 KB, 977x847)

106 KB JPG

>>223932765
Every time?

>>223933267
Every theatre should have a screen just for Digger