/tv/ - what went wrong with the 2013 Carrie? - Television & Film

Anonymous

10/26/26(Mon)10:09:24 No.223941668

File: carrie 1475799629916.jpg (272 KB, 752x522)

272 KB JPG

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:09:24 No.223941668 Archived

what went wrong with the 2013 Carrie?

Anonymous
10/26/26(Mon)10:23:38 No.223941845

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:23:38 No.223941845

File: 1792437085122102.jpg (72 KB, 728x580)

72 KB JPG

>remakes the movie for some reason, instead of re-adapting the book
>far inferior shower scene
>far less artistry in its cinematography
>the boys and girls are clearly in their 30s
>Carrie looks like she’s using the Force when she uses her powers

I honestly think Carrie 2002 is in some ways the best adaptation (barring the ending of course), Angela Bettis actually feels like “creepy Carrie.” But, the 1978 version is undoubtedly the best film

Anonymous
10/26/26(Mon)10:32:19 No.223941957

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:32:19 No.223941957

File: 584483737.jpg (18 KB, 335x597)

18 KB JPG

>>223941668
She wasn't cutie patootie Summer H. Howell

Anonymous
10/26/26(Mon)10:33:07 No.223941963

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:33:07 No.223941963

File: Chloe-Moretz-in-Carrie-Re(...).jpg (46 KB, 570x306)

46 KB JPG

>>223941845
>>the boys and girls are clearly in their 30s

Chloe was 15 when they made this. The youngest Carrie by 6 years.

Anonymous
10/26/26(Mon)10:34:36 No.223941980

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:34:36 No.223941980

File: 1792394284199108.jpg (76 KB, 476x574)

76 KB JPG

>>223941963
True, Chloe looked fine but look at Chris Hargensem and Billy Nolan lmao

Anonymous
10/26/26(Mon)10:40:42 No.223942066

Anonymous 10/26/26(Mon)10:40:42 No.223942066

>>223941668
It was great, but if i had to pick it was the end where Carrie gets driven off to join a team of superpowered women to go on superhero adventures.