This movie is 1h too long.
More like 1h too short
>>224098903i'm with OP. its a good movie but has no business being 3 hours. there's a lot you can trim
>>224098780Classic case of something being a director’s pet project is almost never good. They make it for themselves and not an audience. 1933 King Kong was little over an hour and a half. Jackson bloats his out to over three fucking hours