> "I would want to do a really f--ked up, rated-R version of [Indiana Jones]," the filmmaker says with a sly grin. "I want to do a crazy adventure movie. That's something that Cooper and I have talked about, because we feel like we've never seen something like that; we've only ever seen the family-friendly version. But what happens if two regular guys, or one regular guy, goes on a journey that turns crazy? Literally pushing the boundaries of that genre would be fun for me."
Indiana Jones is already fucked up though. I mean they toned it down later on but still.
With who? Ford is like 90 years old.
>>224111914Can’t wait to see this ugly obnoxious nigger follow up his fluke hit film with a series of box office bombs
>>224111914>Inde Navarette's heart gets ripped out of her chestKino
>>224111914>one regular guyWho is he referring to? Indiana Jones is a highly trained CIA spook apparently.
>Curry Barker styleliterally who style
>>224111968>flukeWith his first film he's established that he's already a grandmaster of his craft. He's "cut his teeth" over the years perfecting every manner of technique, both in front of the camera and behind it. Obsession was FAR from a fluke; it's about as close to perfect as a "sleazy, exploitative fairytale" can get, and I make NO mistake when I say that he is the future of cinema.Now. Would you like to produce some more salt because your own lazy, poor-work-ethic Youtube channel didn't work out?
>>224111914that's temple of doom you retarded zoomzoom
>>224112058The "special edition" of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom - considered to be the definitive, uncut version of the film - was given an M15+ rating here in Australia in 2008. That means that, although it's recommended for mature audiences 15 years and older, anyone is allowed to see it by law. It contains some violence.I think what Mr. Barker is referring to - and where it seems that you yourself is quite the retard - is going FAR beyond that. Beyond that into the realm of extreme cinema like the French put out en masse not long into the 21st century. Cinema that would be slapped with the dreaded R18+ rating (or your precious NC17 rating from the utterly inept MPAA) for the absolute highest of excesses.Get good, phoneposter.
>>224111914This guy is fucking cringe
>>224111968>>224112052>bitter chud gets brutally heemedNice work Curry
>>224112141> we've only ever seen the family-friendly version> we've only ever seen the family-friendly version> we've only ever seen the family-friendly versioni think what this means is you're illiterate you stupid bogan
>>224111914>Curry Barker styleWhat does that even mean? Obsession was incredibly generic looking
>>224112188Dull, drab, washed out with every frame center focused for the braindead youtube audience
>>224111914Obsession was dogshit. This guy stinks
That guy strikes me as someone who just discovered the entire concept of movies a month ago and has started to watch some of them and it blew his mind
>>224112209> center focused Will you STFU already about muh center focused you whiny ass bitch. Obsession was gong to be released on Youtube when it was being filmed!
>>224111939This.The first movie had melting faces.The second had heart ripped out.The third had a guy age into dust.
>join us Curry
>>224111914Has this retarded Zoomer never seen an Indiana Jones movie before?
Script idea: Indiana Jones but he does a bunch of rapes. Like it's the 40s or 50s or whatever, and he's in all these shithole countries where people don't have rights anyway, so they wouldn't be considered rapes in the setting, just a white man fucking bitches in the third world, as is his right. But to the modern eye it would be rapes.
He’s gonna be the next Richard Kelly
>>224112296Richard Kelly had something to say at least
>>224112296Hey, Southland Tales was underappreciated in its time.
Let me guess, it's Indiana Jones and the Return to Castle Wolfenstein
>>224112171>chatgpt style praise with zero substance>heemed Why are shitskins so easily impressed? Is this why you think obsession is good?
>>224112178The time is approximately 57 minutes past the hour. You have ten (10) minutes to produce torrentable version of the "edgy cut" that you presume to have. This will dispel any and all argument that I have and you can feel good for the rest of the day, assured of your smug superiority.Your time starts... NOW.
>>224111914This guy reminds me of Quentin Tarantino with the manic retard energy except he's talentless
>>224112476the base version of temple of doom is the edgy version
Hear me out on thisIndiana Jones, but skyrim.
Oh he's retarded
>>224112052Why did you feel the need to ask chatgpt to make your post for you?
>>224112052This is 100% some zoomer that is easily impressed.
I hate that faggot so much
/tv hates him which means he will have a long lucrative career
>>224112527And that "base" version is? And what's it rated? And for what reasons? Clock's ticking, faggot.
I have to laugh every time I see somebody criticizing great movies made for us normal people who actually leave our house to interact with other normal people. FUCK these autist cunts in their fedora-wearing asses. It's like some unwritten rule in their pathetic notebook that they have to be miserable at everything, that the world is "shit" and everything they hear or see is "shit" and the agenda of everyone is "shit".We get it. We watched that South Park episode, too. You have Asperger's Syndrome. Now drink some whisky, lighten the fuck up and seek help for it. You're not the only one in that boat, bucko.WE rule this board, now. WE decide who's cool and who's not. You rock spiders clinging to the 4chan of the past? The ones that yearn for Bela Tarr marathons while you lick Dorito crumbs off of your fingers and weep for "being born in the wrong generation"? You're archaic. You're ANCIENT FUCKING HISTORY. You've been left behind.Come out of your basement, you cave-dwellers. Come and celebrate the new millennium by watching Obsession with the rest of us. It's the present year and we have cake.Even though it's a lie.
>>224112867This board is a great at knowing what’s good. If it’s widely hated on here it’s good. If it’s total shit it’s loved and “you’re just le filtered”
>>224111914Curry Baker is the most unoriginal person of all time
>>224112853i'm not jumping through a ton of hoops to convince you that temple of doom isn't family friendly lol
>>224111914>i'm your goddamned partner, you piece of shit!>Fuck you!>Fuck you!>FUCK YOOOUUUU
>>224112940Hey faggot, love potion stories been around for a long time. These shows didn’t invent it
>>224111914Isn't Indiana Jones just jew slop where an unathletic jew beats up a bunch of white guys?
>>224111968This. Something something brightest flame something.
>>224112389Look at him go!
>>224112940Everything's already been done. Deal with it.
>>224111914Hes a one hit wonder calling it now.
>>224113209His 2nd film has been testing through the roof.
>>224112944All you've been asked to do, is produce a torrent of this so-called "edgy cut". That's it. If that constitutes "jumping through hoops", then I have some tremendously-bad news for you.You're not gonna make it.
>>224113518https://yts.gg/movies/indiana-jones-and-the-temple-of-doom-1984
>>224112978>>224113183Originality is a spectrum and curry is not on it
>>224113614Nobody cares what you think. Obsession was gigantic success. His follow up movie is being praised as being even better.
>>224113614You lost. I genuinely mean that. Produced for $750,000, it became THE most successful "low budget" film of ALL TIME.Curry Barker is absolutely WHITE-HOT RIGHT NOW. Even more than HANSEL.I'm using unnecessary double-spacing because I know it will PISS YOU OFF EVEN FURTHER.Why don't you admit that you lost? Why don't you admit that most, if not all of the films in your cute little picture that you've been spamming for 10 years, are actually quite good?Why don't you get laid, for once?
>>224111914Yeah heckin swears!
>>224111914There's no way you can do a modern Indiana Jones without either obnoxiously overt commentary about colonialism, or obnoxiously loud criticism that you didn't include said commentary.
>>224111914>really f--ked up, rated-R version of [Indiana Jones]Fucking millenial writers.
>>224111914I'd watch the adventures of Junior Navarrette, why not
>>224111914>What if, like, Temple of Doom but, like, people say FUCK?The greatest auteur of his generation ladies and gentlemen
>>224112347probably not but it fucking should be
>>224112983>unathleticThat was athletic for the time. Hardly anyone worked out back then so simply not being fat was athletic.
>>224114132He’s a zoomer
>>224114254That was tongue in cheek. I was doing the thing where we blame other generations for millenial writing.
>>224111914>I would want to do a really f--ked up, rated-R version of [Indiana Jones]>hehe they're going to go "FUCK FUCK FUCK" all the time>and everyone is going to explode into huge showers of blood with a ton of gore>errrr female nudity? that's kinda problematic...
>>224114270he's actually a gemini because his capricorn rises over libra, which means Jupiter is in ascension during that period which is why he's a spastic
>>224114324Ah okay, all you gotta say.
>>224114270My bad haha
>>224111914>zoomer>cursed with the worst of millennial humor brainrothow does this happen
>>224114442It turns out people are largely all the same.
How about you just make an adventure film that doesn't have to trade on some established IP that's been dragged through the mud.
Temple of Doom was by far the best one.
>>224111939He hasn't seen it, he just wants to make slop
>>224112295He should also have hired servants that he abuses mercilessly. If he thinks there's a dart trap or something in the next room he kicks a small african boy and makes him go in first
>>224111914>But what happens if two regular guys, or one regular guy, goes on a journey that turns crazy?god fucking damnit, I hate the new generation of film makers who have zero knowledge of past movies, because they grew up on youtube. And they are so fucking retarded and uneducated in their chosen profession that they actually believe they are doing something fresh and original... and the saddest part is that general audiences will fall in line to support them, because they are even MORE fucking retarded and uneducated... It's so fucking over for the indie industry
>>224113758>>224113695None of this matters unless his second film makes at least as much money as Obsession. Otherwise his image will be tarnished.See: Jordan Peele
>>224117649> See: Jordan PeeleObsession made more money than anything Peele ever made.
>>224117696>missing the point that badlyNot talking to retards, sorry.
>>224116726This
>>224111914Making family friendly movies r-rated is soooo 2010. Actual filmmakers of the old times made great movies without unnecessary gore or violence. Sex and nudity are fine tho
>>224111914He'll film Indy as a teacher raping Marion as a student when she's being a cunty piss baby
Barker stuff is funny and he’s talented. Idiots on here will say otherwise but tv is full of morons. That said what he says in interviews comes off as stupid and cringe. I give him a pass because he literally went from making shit oh Youtube while serving people coffee to the big times. Faggots on here are use to the Jew groomed Hollywood talent with the PR type responses
>>224111914I mean the idea sounds great and it's like most real expeditions went. "Regular guy" angle sounds like ass though and I already see someone dislocating a leg and seeing the bone and the shot just tries to make you icky and the movie will be that.
Based Curry making the failed doomers of /tv/ seethe uncontrollably
