Arthouse & ClassicsAvanteGardedition>QotDFavourite avant-garde /film/maker?>BonusFavourite Deren flick?Previous: >>224195856
Queen of /film/
>>224210203>Favourite Deren flick?Syndromes and a Century
>>224210203Is Godard an avant-garde filmmaker? What about Bresson? Or are we limiting ourselves to non-narrative art?
>>224210439See, I think Bresson is experimental on a conceptual layer, rather than on a craftsmanship one. It's his methodology that's avant-garde, not the films themselves.
>>224210405>Is Godard an avant-garde filmmaker?Yes. At least that's how he saw himself. Whether his work is actually "pushing the envolpe" though ... debatable.>What about Bresson?Nah. Some people might call him one, along the same lines that Lang sometimes get called an avantgardist, but it doesn't fit his attitude at all. When he was more "rebellious", it was in the bohemian sense of an artistic free-spirit.>Or are we limiting ourselves to non-narrative art?I don't see why one would.
>>224210203>Favourite avant-garde /film/maker?Thinking in terms of avant-garde movements, I'd say that I enjoy German Expressionism most. But there isn't really one single director who was at the forefront of that.In terms of singular directors, I'd go with Resnais, if you consider his brand of surrealism avant-garde.
One could consider soviet montage avant-garde.
The real thread.
>>224210668>The real thread.If we can get the mods to merge it with the imaginary thread, we'll have a complex one!
Un chien andalou.
L'age d'or.
>>224210688I don't think that "complex" is the word that I'd use to describe the result of merging a bunch of the K-shitter's webms with this thread.
>>224210746Well, mathematics aren't always intuitive, but they are inevitable.
>QotDPeleshyan
>>224210203>QotDavant garde a clue haha
>>224211061Heh.
>>224210746 K-shitter webm spam belongs in /kdg/, or they could always just make their own thread. It's weird how Hong Kong nor Japanese cinema have this problem in /film/…
>>224211222This is my favorite Jessica Harper role, although the ai made her look Asian
>>224211222your Korea derangement syndrome and Japanophilia are not my problem
>>224211222Based rice bunny
>>224209489Many such cases indeed
>>224210439You replied in the wrong thread, anon
>>224210267What a doll. Oh to nut on the bottom of a kippah and stick it on her head like a contact lens
>>224211294Kill yourself.
>>224211445proof pudding
>>224211264>the ai made her look AsianI thought the same exact thing jej
>>224211411holy shit
>>224210611Oh yeah? Post your top 5 Resnaises. Don't wuss out.
>>224211411The Jeff Goldblum special.
>>224211673>not a single rebuttal list posted after catunc listgate 2026
>>224211673I don't do toplists, not for any director nor in general. Simply because which films I prefer at any given moment is always subject to change and depends on my mood in that moment.What I can say though is that I generally enjoy his earlier work more than his later work and the more abstract and allegorical they are, the better - for that reason, among his early work I find La Guerre est Finie to be particularly weak, wheras Smoking and No Smoking are strong points of his later career.Overall, as clichéd as that answer may be, L'Année Dernière à Marienbad resonated with me the most on an emotional and on an intellectual level..
>>224211892NTA but as a fellow Dreyer/Czechchad, I respect Catunc's list.
>>224210654True.
>>224211952I was mostly just curious about your thoughts on Providence. I think it occupies a nice spot between the 'formalist' early Resnais and the 'gonzo' Resnais you see in his late career works.Still have to see Muriel. That's allegedly his most impenetrable work.
Resnais formalist
Ferreri Leftist
>>224211265you cornball.
>>224212155Rare Cornballposter W.
Or as they say in Nippon, corunubarru
Korunubaaru*
>>224212081>your thoughts on ProvidenceIt's an intriguing commentary on the writing process, on the fictional, the lived experience and how the human mind bridges between them. And, yes, it strikes a balance, but it kinda also keeps the scenes of each his early and his late style separate. At least I'd say there is no scene that fully blends both in equal parts.>Muriel. That's allegedly his most impenetrable work.It's interesting. But not as ... enjoyable a watch - not sure that's the right word. Not as "laid back", maybe. There's a lot going on, many little things, character relations, and keeping track of all is straining. But that's probably the point.
>>224212299>>224212318Arigato, nipponanon(s)s.
>>224212131It's funny how you can tell he was a fatass just from watching his films.
>>224212299>>224212318No one in Japan would pronounce "corn" as コルン (KORUN). Phonetically, the r is supposed to be procatically silent, "corn" just has a long flat o-sound. Therefore, the Japanese transsciption is コーン (KOON). This also matches how they actually do spell it when it's part of loanwords that are in everyday use, for example コーンスターチ ("corn starch") or コーンフレーク ("cornflakes").Furthermore, "ball" is not spelled バッる or バール, simply because in the English pronounciation, the "a" is not an a-sound here, but closer to an o-sound. Which means that "ball" os written as ボール (BOORU). Compare to the Japanese names of sports like football (フットボール) or handball (ハンドボール).Put that together and you get コーンボール for "cornball".
>>224212729Nerd.
>>224212761Sorry, but I cannot let you spout blatant misinformation.
>>224212729you コーンボール.
>>224212729>>224212769Unironically based. You're the true nipponanon.
>>224212780Kek.
Imagine not being able to say two consonants together lol those japs.
>>224212729Now say it in Korean.
>japanophiles don't even know how to properly use kana.Embarrassing. I'll stick with hangul.
>>224212780
>>224212896Mirthful post
>>224212855Sorry, I don't speak any Korean. I just know that their writing system is a huge mess. And I don't watch enough Korean stuff to really know about their pronunciation either. To me, Korean sounds like a drunken Chinese person trying to speak Japanese in a really weird and slightly antiquated accent.
>>224212880you 콘볼.
Fuck Korea and Japan, what we should be watching is pre-revolution Chinese films from Shanghai starring Ruan Lingyu
>>224212972>Fuck KoreaYes.>and JapanNo.>we should be watching is pre-revolution Chinese films from Shanghai starring Ruan LingyuYes.
>>224212914hehe
>>224212972I certainly agree with the first part.
Remember to keep yourselves hydrated
>>224213043kino
>>224212972>Fuck KoreaYES>and JapanYEEEEEEEEEESSSSSS>watching pre-revolution Chinese filmsyawn
>>224212780Perhaps I was too quick to judge you.
>>224213468Anata wa koonbooru desu
>>224210203Meshes never gets old, though it was shown to me by the kind of liberal women who lived on government grants (including TROONS), would never oppose endless wars (on Zionism's behalf).
>>224213498Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
>>224213571Kino.
>>224210203>Favourite avant-garde /film/maker?Not Brakhage.
>>224210203>Favourite avant-garde /film/maker?Is there a distinction between avant-garde and arthouse?
>>224214286Yes.
>>224214371How are they different?
Sorry about the communist schizo trying to ruin this general too.
We're all communist schizos here.
>>224214286And avant-garde film is arthouse, but an arthouse film isn’t necessarily avant-garde.
>>224214559What makes avant-garde distinct?
>>224214559An* not and.
avant your fuckin ass if you know what i mean
Funny how I've posted Maya nip probably a dozen times at this point but the only time it's ever been deleted was today…
>>224214617Avant-garde is a descriptor not a genre. It’s an umbrella term for anything that introduces new concepts or styles, going completely against the norm. Think Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring.
>>224214550you cornball.
>>224214689Arthouse is hardly a genre either, though.
>>224214518Is xe from /kdg/?
>>224210203>Favourite avant-garde /film/maker?Not Snow
>>224214736Yeah, he used to be a nice contributing community member before he trooned out, became a communist, and went crazy in general. He also has the backing of the jannies and if you complain about him you get banned.
>>224214732Yes, these terms are all mostly arbitrary anyways. Old Hollywood classics play in art houses all the time, but you’d never call them arthouse films.
>>224210203>Favourite avant-garde /film/maker?im actually more of an avant-tard enjoyer myself
>>224214421You know you could just google the respective definitions, right? Or read earlier posts in this thread that argue what might or might not be considered avant-garde and why.Anyway, I'll give you the short version:Avant-garde --- artists or their works that are literally "at the forefront" of their genre, pushing the envelope, trying to improve or expand their artform. Avantgardists consider themselves innovators and pioneers. Avantgarde pieces and movements are usually experimental. What differenciates the avant-gare from the bohème is the sentiment of making "high art" rather than personal expression, formal perfection rather than free form, redefining universial standards rather than defining ones individualisms.Arthouse --- a losely defined term that describes any kind of film with an artistic merit, but mainly independent ones that traditionally air in independent cinemas, so called art-houses. This includes the avant-garde, but also a wide variety of other non-mainstream films.
>>224214830>You know you could just google?Yes. You know that could be said of essentially any question asked here, right?
>>224214829Odd looking duck.
>>224214789>Old Hollywood classics play in art houses all the time, but you’d never call them arthouse films.That's because the definiton works the other way around. Arthouse films always play in art-houses, but not all films playing in an art-house are necessarily arthouse films.
>>224214849>You know that could be said of essentially any question asked here, right?Questions about definitons and facts, yes.Questions about opinions and tastes, not so much.The latter ones usually lead to the more interesting discussions.
it insists upon itself
Erm consult the chart
so now /film/ will pretend to hate cinema paradiso because of poster drama?
>>224214887It also varies from place to place. Battle of Algiers is definitely an arthouse film; but I’m sure to Algerians it’s regular mainstream programming for them. So would you still call it arthouse?
>>224214901Questions about definitions and facts and questions about opinions and tastes can't be so easily separated. I wasn't asking about the difference between arthouse and avant-garde from the perspective of a lexicographer.
>>224214995I'd call it fucking shit, personally.
>>224214995Yeah, I guess I would. As I said in my other post, the term is loosely defined and everyone decides for himself what to include. You can easily find reasons to include all kinds of things, even mainstream Hollywood stuff (which doesn't feel right, but whatever) if you tried hard enough on the artistic merit side of things.Ironically, I think that the avant-garde term faces the opposite problem, in that it is too rigidly defined. If we took the demands of that term seriously, there's almost always a technical reason NOT to include some director or film: Not artistic enough, not unconventional or innovative enough, not rebellious enough, not formal enough, not the right personality/attitude, too accessible, too individualist/personal, too much of a people-pleaser, too close to the Zeitgeist, etc.
superior vers of The Housemaid coming through
>>224215030True. And the definitions we give here certainly come with a bit of personal bias and interpretation.But they usually are nonetheless pretty close to a lexicographic defition at their core, to the point where people here will mostly agree on them and not spend much time arguing.When it comes to matters of taste, however, all hell breaks loose if you dare to dislike something someone loves, or sometimes even just like something someone hates. But as long as people keep it civil enough to still exchange serious arguments rather than pure insults, those debates can be really fun and enlightening (in regards to different perspectives on the same things).
>>224214829What is this from?
>>224215267Panna a netvor 1978
>>224215041Why? Don’t like brown people in your films?
>>224215267beauty and t'beast
>>224215288I don't like dull, simplistic and self-congratulatory apologetics for political violence.
>>224214904I resent it for so forcefully jerking tears out of me.
>>224215301I wish more posters knew how to spoonfeed themselves.
We're all forcefully jerking here.
>>224215267beauty and the beast (1978).
Brakhage's Chinese Series.
>>224215267Beauty and the Beast (1978) dir. Juraj Herz
Guys, it has been answered.
>>224215464She answered?
>>224215498I wish.
>>224215464But have (You) been answered?
>the korean thread is still up
>>224215498Chinlet
>>224215622>6 hours of K-slop screencap necrobumps and schizo seething about a cabal
>>224215713rude
araki erotic
>>224215734>6 hours of korea derangement syndrome
>>224215734He would be more based if he was seething about the private tracker cabal.
>>224215734>6 hours of K-slop screencap necrobumpshe was doing that in kdg the other day too
>>224215917likely says person that has been spamming /kdg/ with low quality nonsense for the last week.
>>224215734Kek
>>224215267The catfag list
Beauty and the Beast (live-action Disney film) < Beauty and the Beast (animated Disney film) < Beauty and the Beast (Cocteau) < Beauty and the Beast (Herz) < Beauty and the Beast (David Bowie song)
that's our girl, star of the /film/ favorite Haruhara-san's Recorder (2021)https://youtu.be/hDQOYLtBVw8?t=88>Araki won Best Dancer at the KYOTO CHOREOGRAPHY AWARD 2020 event
>>224216156Look at her go!
>>224216216Does she dance in Haruhara-san's Recorder (2021)? I can't recall.
>>224215734Many such cases!
>>224216254Gotta love how all those people just ignore the barefooted woman in the nightgown sperging out in the middle of the street.
How many times has /kschizofilm/ been btfo by the 'funnies? This isn't the first counterbake
>>224215935>my screenshots aren't low quality! only yours are! why?? they just are ok!!! >>224216382>"if we ignore her, maybe she will stop..."
>>224215853>t. trackerlet
>>224216411Not as many times as he who shall not be named, but a good few times. I'd guess at the very least five times.
>>224216474yes, because you do dumb low effort roleplay nonsense with shitty crops. a full sized screenshot with no accompanying text is infinitely better than that.
What does /film/ has against korea? Do you niggers also hate bollywood kinos?
>>224216623>What does /film/ has against korea?It's more that we have something against the schizo than against Korea, though Korean film isn't particularly great.>hate bollywood kinosSholay is good fun.
justice for unnie
>>224216618>"yeah thats correct. cropping and roleplaying is literally more effort than doing a screenshot, especially screenshots that are repeatedly posted..."
>>224216750yeah, go on fill the thread up with them again you'll see how quickly people get tired of your spam
>>224216679>It's more that we have something against the schizo than against KoreaThis, the gommunist tranny puts me off from discussing anything I've seen.
This thread is shit. I shit on it.
>>224216797take your right wing election tourist nonsense back to twitter/reddit where you came from
>>224216777my threads survived. the schizos was nuked. mods=gods>pic related is your spam and you did it first.
there's actually a korean film about this thread
>>224216623S. Ray, Kaul, Ghatak, Sen, the list goes on and on...
>>224216882yeah 10-12 posts at the end of a thread is the same thing as spamming multiple threads to image limit. moron.
>>224216846you project so much you should open your own kinoplex
>>224216931uh huh, go on post more buzzwords that your podcast daddies taught you.
>>224216891Looks more like a film about ... crotcheting?And a poor pun that probably doesn't work in Korean, does it?
>>224216951>The Korean title for the 2014 movie Thread of Lies is 우아한 거짓말, which literally translates to "Elegant Lies".so yeah not much elegance here, just a screeching election tourist.
>>224216777>>224216882>>224216910Please take your /kdg/ shitfliging back to the containment thread >>224210134 this thread was made specifically to avoid it.
>>224217012this thread caused it you could have just used the thread that was made first
>>224216944can i use election tourist or did you reserve that one already
>>224217031for yourself? I mean I guess, you could also use erection tourist since half the time you're just posting smut trash.
>>224217025You could just post in /kdg/ and we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.
>>224217076The Housemaid (1960) is /film/. Sorry about your korea derangement syndrome.
>>224217012my apologies brother.
>>224217115no, go on do your little shtick here and see how it goes over.
>>224217097the housemaid 2010 clears. check this post >>224215168
>>224217097> Silvestre.1981.1080p.BluR(...).pngMoar.
>>224217076Stop replying to him. There's no genuine indignation. He's had it made clear countless times that we don't want someone using cinema as a pretext for colonising our general with his Korean culture fetish, but he insists on doing this anyway solely to get a rise out of us.
>>224217134>it's better because smutgrim state of affairs
>>224217135why are euroids like this?
Possible Love was very mid.
>>224217191take it to /kdg/
Thread has been a mess yesterday and today, why? Please talk about films and don't fight guys!I am thinning badly and my hair will look like this guy and/or Godard (LMAO)>>224217187thoughts?
>>224217130out of respect for /film/ i will not engage with you any more here mr bopeepschizo. and you should do the same. please stick to ontopic discussion about /film/.
>>224217229go on, keep going, show everyone how insufferable you are. can you get this thread and the next one to image limit as a "performance"?
>>224217222>Thread has been a mess yesterday and today, why?Last couple of threads it was Gio and Cucksta, this time it's the Kshitter emboldened by how long both threads stayed up for with the last double bake incident.
>>224217222
>>224217259I am gio though and i have been busy playing fortnite so no posts from me
>>224217187it sounds better in portuguese
>>224217097>The Housemaid (1960)Y'know, if you'd just told me to watch actual K-kino like The Handmaiden instead of Silvestre, I would've done it that night. But apparently you're a good ol' fashioned quaker so that wouldn't happen in a billion years lole
>>224217252see>>224217012
hey dont blame me for last thread, i am busy playing for this https://youtu.be/xKQV04WTJHowhats some kino films about gambling? i liked casino but you guys will laugh at me for liking that one>>224217294I am thinning exactly like the guy next to uhh that looks like tim roth, thats tim roth i thinkdo i cope, use fin and mino or let it go?
>>224217270all you have been doing is dragging your foot in my stirrup ever since you got here.
>>224217338>whats some kino films about gambling?The Killing of a Chinese Bookie, although it's about more than that
>>224217115Kinoest nose ever.
>>224217338Michael Gambon. played Dumbledore in the later arry potta movies. m8 how do i know? you could try that shit for 6months to year and see what happens. what do you have to lose?
she's all set
>>224217338The Only Game in Town is good.
>>224217416>although it's about more than thatLet me guess: It's also about a killing?
>>224217338>do i cope, use fin and mino or let it go?Don't do anything, just accept it.
>>224217487I'm talking about its themes.
>>224217432If he looks like that, he's already fucked.
>>224217222I hate you but that chick is SEXO. I will have to taste her and see how it goes from there.
There's a hot black lady in The Killing of a Chinese Bookie.
>>224217500What a novel concept to judge a film by anything but its title.
>>224217063>smutnever mix me up with those faggots ever again please
>>224217528It would be cool if more titles were just a description of the film.
>>224217532unnie it appears you've been caught in the crossfire, sorry.
Boudu saved from drowning.
>>224217502It looks like a 25 percent on the way to look like that, thinning there but like not that bad...yet.>>224217432Thanks, what film is that? I wanna watch it>>224217416I heard about this from somwthing I read about the safdies, added. Thanks>>224217519She is hot but her music kinda sucks
>>224217550>>224217532sexless anons should meet up to lose their virginity
Sirs I think I prefer Gio over the kshitter poster...
>>224217616La fille de l'eau.
>>224217746one bullettwo faggots
>>224217693>what film is that?Popiół i diament (1958) / Ashes and Diamonds
>>224217829unnie don't use that word
unnies I have a cold must still go to work tomorrow
>>224217424hold up
>>224216623a couple of threads ago some anon made some good points about Korean art and culture. I’m too lazy to find it though
>>224218010no. if you do not feel well, do not go to work.
>>224218041https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/224169824/#224170768
>>224218093>The Korean mind is not art compatible.>The Korean mind knows only to duplicate, to combine. To Frankenstein. They are not capable of originality, look at every single aspect of their culture- it’s almost exclusively a haggard mismatch of Japanese and American every single fucking time.>Their films are an embarrassment, luckily that is far from the only embarrassment though.very basado
korean frankenstein mentioned
>>224218021Nowhere near Silvana.
There's a lot of rumours going around that Sebastian Lelio's death was suicide. People on socmed are sharing what is alleged to be a leaked death certificate.
>Bonus bonusmost /film/ic music video?https://youtu.be/-6HWMkyTAaA
>>224217424
>>224217424>Kinoest nose ever.Kat Byron's definitely in the running.
>>224218242That's literally just kpop dances, anon. Nothing cinematic, no serious acting, generally poor direction.>most /film/ic music video?Try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeQM1c-XCDcMost Rammstein vids have a certain cinematic quality and comparatively high production value.
>>224218463I will listen.If it's a storyline you wanthttps://youtu.be/CMNahhgR_sshttps://youtu.be/jeqdYqsrsA0
>>224218242>>>/mu/132109344
>>224218130Wasn’t this just catunc sperging out again
>>224218650
>>224218650Stop telling people where to go or what they can post, so annoying
>>224218509Those two are a bit better, but it's less about having a story and more about how they are shot. The first video you posted really didn't work as film because it simply wasn't well lit or well blocked. As I said, the other two do that a bit better, but of course it's still not "/film/ic" in the sense that the things we usually discuss in here tend to make very deliberate choices in their visual framing that I simply don't see here.And of course, when you have your singers act out action scenes or want them to emote effectively, there's a good chance you'll end up with subpar actors. Many music videos have that problem, of course.Another thing is the cutting away to those dance sequences. That's not something that happens in film outside of musicals or Bollywood. And doesn't always work there either. That being said, it can work, even in a music video. Micheal Jackson, I'd argue, made it work repeatedly. But, again, it's about how such a sequence is shot, and when it's too flashy, like in your first two examples, it clashes too much with the rest.
Heaven With a Barbed Wire Fence, now there's a great title.
>>224218651whoever it was is correct
>>224218707>1939I'm out
>>224218688>>>/lgbt/
so we're moving here>>224210134>>224210134>>224210134when this thread reaches bump limit?
>>224218726Stagecoach was released in that same year. Show some respect lil bro.
>>224218743Hell no.
>>224218743Nope. If this one hits the bump limit before that one then it gets counterbaked a second time.
>>224218757
#ruthless
>>224218757But will the other get to the bump limit? That is the question? Lil bro needs to sleep at some point
>>224218768He's trying his best to spam this one to death and there are a few retards bumping his thread for him whether intentionally or not.
>>224218726Too new for you?
>>224218802
>>224218826Is pic related at least good?
Stacy Keach has died. Make the new one a Fat City edition.
>>224218858it has heart
>>224218743>he really felt the need to ask this>>224218757Of course.
>>224218888As Above So Below is criminally underrated
>>224218888
>>224218902One of the only decent found footage horrors.
>>224218858no. of course it isn't. this schizo just has an obsessive infantile fetishization of that actress, a bit like sarah gadon poster, but less sane.
>>224218922
>>224218922Stop giving him oxygen you fucking moron.
>>224218942
>>224218928she has jaundice. poor cunt.
>>224218902>>224218921Hell yeah, and I say that as someone that is typically cynical toward FF.
>>224218922Dodging a bullet I guess, looks like shit by his own webms
>no one is posting in his 3 threads
>>224218973
>>224218982
>>224218958
>>224219039>>224219010>>224218990>>224218955I'm starting to like her... what is this?
>>224219129Please stop encouraging him.
>>224219129A Werewolf Boy (2012) starring Park Bo Young>... a beauty-and-the-beast tale ... has heart, heft and surprises.
>>224219129poor man's fake ananko
>im starting to samefag...can you tell?
>>224219129Don't engage with him you fucking retard.
>>224219159>beauty
whats going on here?
>>224219160
corrr
Lots of irl kino in corea
>>224219179it's true but that's from a show let's keep it about films please
the impact of xenoestrogen on the white male psyche
>>224219204
>>224219170I'm not him, I never post any pictures because I'm a phone poster and lazy
Oh shit wrongnwebm fuck shit sry
>>224218982This idiot has his own thread yet feels compelled to spam here instead, I don't get it.
>>224219209Me in the middle
>>224219197Some spammer trying to push this thread past the bump limit before he gets banned so he can try anew to bait people into his fake thread and claim some hollow victory or something.
>>224219243based phoneposter. i can't wait for verticle kinographies we will get to watch this century!!!
>>224219246hey that's not a film that's a tiktok
>>224219255He's trying to kill this one out spite because we didn't use his (which he also made out of spite).
>>224219257Record scratch* yeahhh that’s me …
Don't mind me, just chilling with the unnies
>>224219267TikTok is cinema unnie
>>224219257Me in the corner.Me in the spot, light,losing my religion.
>>224219255he made a /film/ thread, the /minami/ thread, the /kdg/ thread, not sure if he made the korean gameshow thread and he sometimes makes kpop threads on /mu/ its like he has no life.
>>224219270don't project your spite on to me
I can fix him
>>224219290I've never made a kpop thread. Are you gonna post about film or not?
>>224219307
>>224219310>Are you gonna post about film or not?Sure. What's your favourite European film.Hard mode: Answer the question without writing anything about Korea or posting a Korean webm.
>>224219270So he's like Gadon/Fixfag during that one time he webm-spammed /film/ to bump limit, a new thread was inevitably made, then hours later all his shit was nuked along with the new?Fantastic job, mods!!
>>224219319I'm not here to play your games I'm here to post films.
>>224219310>Are you gonna post about film or not?Kek
This is why whoever is first making the thread should be the OP. Had lloyd been quicker, this would not have happened.
>>224219329>to play your gamesYou said you wanted to talk about film. I asked you a film-related personal question. That's not a game, that's a discussion prompt.If you're serious about talking about film, you should be overjoyed that someone asked you your opinion on something topical.
>>224219344or just use the one that was made first
This was a fun thread bakas, laughed a few times.
Bopoop/john/pby schizo will just rape the next thread anyway.
>>224217338>kino films about gamblingOwning Mahowny We watching Gaytum get BTFO in Philly. I bet my life savings on it even!
>>224219363Yeah, there's no way to win this.
>>224219353not when your motivations are insincere
>>224219344Sure, the first poster who makes a SERIOUS thread AFTER reaching the bump limit should be.Not a good idea to force people into a thread that's trying to force off-topic discussion that no one is interested in just because a spammer was more triggerhappy.
NEW>>224210134NEW>>224210134NEW>>224210134NEW>>224210134
NEW>>224219383NEW>>224219383NEW>>224219383NEW>>224219383NEW>>224219383
>>224219391this is old though, you're just spamming a bunch of stuff.
Time for a new thread, who will win this time??!!!?? Do we move to the other one?
>>224219375This was a great thread despite all the schizo spamming, but I'm gonna go watch a /film/ now. >>224219399Top bloke
>>224219376>your motivations are insincereWhat's insincere about a question like that? Is it so hard to imagine that I, and maybe even some others here, are interested in what you, as someone who seems obsessed with Korea to the point of spamming it all over the place, would enjoy outside of that interest?No, anon, I honestly want to know what your taste in European cinema is. And then we could maybe discuss it. I've discussed other people's tastes with them before and thoroughly enjoyed it.
>>224219344I had one at the ready, but changed it to honour the Deren request. Kshitter seized on what would've usually been an insignificant delay.
>>224219487The other day's snafu must've given him ideas.
>>224219423>This was a great threadLegitimately one of the worst.
>>224219556don't be so melodramatic or else we're gonna think you're one of the kdrama watchers
>>224219556We salvaged it the best we could…
>>224219591I fear that many fell for every shitty baitpost he threw /film/'s way.
>>224219556It was pretty solid for the first 150 or 200 posts. And the rest was spam. Just ignore the end and pretend that the thread was a bit shorter than usual.
bump of /film/
