/v/ - >go to my local video game store's website >see th - Video Games

Anonymous

09/20/25(Sat)20:19:08 No.721206994

File: what.png (308 KB, 597x455)

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:19:08 No.721206994 Archived

>go to my local video game store's website
>see this.
This makes no sense. Should I contact them to tell them that they made a mistake with the catalog?

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:20:02 No.721207043

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:20:02 No.721207043

>>721206994
They made up some console names? Is that the problem?

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:20:13 No.721207052

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:20:13 No.721207052

>>721206994
PS1 was already considered retro when PS3 was launched.

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:20:34 No.721207076

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:20:34 No.721207076

>>721206994
Atlus really outdid itself this time.

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:34:46 No.721208051

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:34:46 No.721208051

>>721206994
There are no new official release for those consoles. Retro makes sense, but depreciated would be better.

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:38:16 No.721208278

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:38:16 No.721208278

>>721206994
Que es esto???

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:41:38 No.721208531

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:41:38 No.721208531

>>721207052
PS4 and One should be "retro" too, it's been more than 10 years since it came out. 10 years seems to be the rule.

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:46:36 No.721208889

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:46:36 No.721208889

>>721208531
PS4 literally has games announced for next year. How can it be retro when it still gets games

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:51:24 No.721209247

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:51:24 No.721209247

>>721206994
Everything that isn't current gen is retro
Deal with it

Anonymous
09/20/25(Sat)20:56:11 No.721209589

Anonymous 09/20/25(Sat)20:56:11 No.721209589

>>721208889
Is that the rule? PS1 and especially PS2 had some late stragglers, surely it shouldn't count.