[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mp2l8g5v02kf1.png (656 KB, 1134x842)
656 KB
656 KB PNG
>>
>>719273592
why do you have to sexualize her?
>>
>>719273663
why do you have to uglify her?
>>
this is fascism
>>
>>719273663
>wanting to see beautiful women is just like rape, stop raping women
I am so glad people like you are being outvoted
>>
File: Angelina Danilova.webm (991 KB, 720x1280)
991 KB
991 KB WEBM
>>719273592
Why are games and mainstream CGI people so afraid of feminine beauty?
>>
>>719274076
I think it's partly intentional, because they are afraid of criticism of objectifingy women by making them too barbie doll perfect looking and partly due to incompetence.
>>
File: 1756188909434.png (1.75 MB, 1160x1609)
1.75 MB
1.75 MB PNG
Nothing to fix, chud
>>
>>719273663
>sexualize (verb)
why is second wave feminist psychology retardation like this accepted as common speech? you should be beaten to death with a shovel
>>
>>719274634
You're just mad because you don't like what they speak out against. Doesn't mean the concept doesn't exist or it isn't a real world. Get over it, chuddo.
>>
>>719274415
This, except it's 100% intentional and the horseshit from >>719274528 this interview is just PR speak. "Our consultants said that these pretty girls were problematic & we had to change them, but the reasons they gave wouldn't play well, so here's some words words words"
>>
>>719274528
Explain every animated... everything.
>>
>>719274528
>It's hard to have an artistic vision guys
>>
>>719273663
Thats all women are good for
>>
>>719275014
even your mother?
>>
>>719274528
>What is every Illidan cutscene
>Every Protoss focused cutscene in Starcraft
>Gul'dan
>>
>>719273663
OP just messed up the cheekbones, but it's closer to what Liadrin has looked like for at least a decade
>>
Isn't that a cropped *eddit post? There were like 10 threads about this shit already and you're all still falling for it
>>
File: 1609504646764.jpg (53 KB, 636x517)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>719274528
>It's very difficult to convey emotions when these features are distorted.
They could have just said they lack talent and skills.
>>
do you think when they make these tranny characters that they model a female character and then give it the decepticon treatment or do you think they sculpt a tranny from scratch?
>>
>>719274415
Agreed. Probably want to avoid filling an impossible beauty standard that would be possible through photorealistic cgi
>>
why do chuds get upset when the fictional polygon character doesnt make their peepee hard?
>>
>>719275673
when fictional polygon character gets improved*
>>
>>719274528
Its cause they fired all the talent cinematic makers after the microshit acquisition gutted them
>>
File: 1695534391568.webm (3.47 MB, 1920x1080)
3.47 MB
3.47 MB WEBM
>>719275673
Same could be said about the thousands of articles and complaints back when characters where sexy
>>
>>719275673
you got a boner over the pic on the left? damn bro nice libido
>>
>>719274528
Wall-E
>>
File: 1650818576241.jpg (738 KB, 2156x2782)
738 KB
738 KB JPG
>>719275673
They don't have to be gooner material every time. But they should at least be aesthetically interesting or cool to look at. Non of the shit from WoW, Borderlands 4, Outer Worlds 2 etc. are, if I wanted to look at that shit I'd look out my window.
>>
>>719274528
This is why AI will win
>>
>>719274076
Why are you still a virgin?
>>
>>719274528
>We can't move eyebrows and convey emotions with eyes
Oh okay, fucking retards.
>>
>>719274528
Feels like the same shit as with the Halo show where they insisted he needs his mask off to emote.
>>
File: WALL-E_(character).png (144 KB, 271x369)
144 KB
144 KB PNG
>>719274528
Wall-E proves that bullshit wrong. I could feel the emotions from that retarded little robot and empathize with it.
>>
bump
>>
>>719274528
Mind you Blizzard made a cinematic about a robot with no face that had more feeling than whatever they've shit up in the past years.
>>
>>719273767
>>719273926
>>719274634
>>719275014
>>719275263
>5 fucking retards responded to this stupid ass bait

Half the problem with this website is you fucking idiots have literally no awareness.
>>
>>719274415
I don't think it's partly intentional. It's 100% intentional
>>
>>719280443
Yes it's close to 100% I mean even if they wanted to, they probably couldn't, looking at the end results. It's probably because it's outsourced to India, or the development team got hit by the DEI beam.
>>
File: 1734568842453290.jpg (225 KB, 641x987)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
>>719274528
same energy
>>
>>719280674
I'm confident that even jeets can make a half attractive woman. I think it's purely ideologically driven
>>
>>719280723
Yeah maybe you're right.
>>
File: Its over.png (36 KB, 999x168)
36 KB
36 KB PNG
>>719276414
Are you sure about that?
>>
>>719273663
>why do you have to make her look like a woman?
Women, the not ugly ones, are inherently sexy. If you de-sexualize someone, that means you uglify the person. Make the person look unfit for breeding, make them weak, sickly, diseased. Who wants to be that willingly?No one sane. Who wants to look at such people? No one sane.

Next question.
>>
>>719280936
>30 billion
That's literally nothing. Cuckraine gets more from jewrope yearly,
>>
>>719282005
>Women, the not ugly ones, are inherently sexy.
Absolutely not. Women are fucking fake hence how utterly entrenched they are in makeup
>>
>>719282207
The vast majority of women look 10x better without makeup.
>>
>>719274528
>The cinematic team put an emphasis in conveying human emotions. Emotions that would be more difficult to convey when a character's eyes are completely glowing gold or if their design is too close to the in-game model, which can't always convey subtle facial expressions.
>It's simply about human eyes, a human mouth and that's how we [as humans] interpret emotions. It's very difficult to convey emotions when these features are distorted.
Ah yes, because nobody was able to understand:
>Hellscream, Gul'dan, and Mannoroth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLzhlsEFcVQ
>Sylvanas, Genn Greymane, and Saurfang
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSJr3dXZfcg

or the dozens with Illidan
>>
File: 6qvqip2dm0h51.jpg (37 KB, 601x508)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>Women, the not ugly ones, are inherently sexy. If you de-sexualize someone, that means you uglify the person
>>
>>719275314
Hello tourist, Shadowlands and BfA have some of the best cinematics ever made, the elves don't have shiny eyes in both of them.
>>
>>719283985
>when a character's eyes are completely glowing gold or if their design is too close to the in-game model
Are you retarded? all of them don't have glowy eyes or look like anything like their generic in-game model
Nigger, can't you fucking read?
>>
>>719274528
>um we can't convey emotion through a helmet
same fucking shit. They are just shit at their job. If their eyes are glowing, then make other facial features do the fucking job.
>>
>>719273592
not your image
>>
>>719284309
They managed to give Gul'dan glowing eyes
Also the point is that every one of those characters is non-human but is still able to easily convey their emotions without giving up their non-human-ness

If they're able to do it with the orcs, a worgen, and a fucking pit lord they have no excuse to need to fuck up the elf look ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'VE ALREADY DONE IT WITH AN UNDEAD ELF
>>
>>719274710
women are holes
>>
>>719284247
Hello shill from the other thread, BfA cinematic is extremely overrated and the Shadowlands one is dogshit. Kys.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.