It been fucking years, why the fuck is it stil $60 dollars.
>>719320124so they can slap a fat 70-80% on it during sales
>>71932026570-80% off*
>>719320124all souls games are like this. I only just begrudgingly got shadow of the erdtree because it thought it'd be reduced by now. Soulsplayers will eat up anything and they know that
>>719320124Why didnt you bought it back when it was $14 pesos mexicanos (less than $1) in 2016
>>719320124Because youtubers keep making video essays about it
>>719320124you are not missing anything really.
>>719320124I recently played Sekiro, Wo Long Fallen Dynasty, Elden Ring, and Wuchang. And Stellar Blade, although I guess that isn’t really a full soulslike. The only ones I really liked were Wuchang and Stellar Blade. Should I bother playing DS3?
I also don't get it.Feels like even Elden Ring gets discounted more often.Sekiro is regularly down to 30 bucks, too.
They don't want anybody to suffers through the hordes of chinks and russoids infesting pvp with chetas and glitches
>>719320124Because it's a famous premium game and it keeps selling
>>719322147Yes
>>719320124Yup and it's still peak
>>719320124I bought the game + the DLCs for something like 23 bucks and looking back I feel like it was a bad deal.
it was the best and most popular souls game iirc
>>719320124Same reason Project cars 3, a game that failed in almost every area doesn't get discounts to this day; Bamco's greed.Still, souls games do get discounts, but when you compare it to games that released in the same year it's still on the more pricey side.
What pisses me off is that on consoles you can get a physical copy of the game plus dlc for under $30(non-sale price).
>>719320124Look at call of duty games. Or Nintendo games for that matter
>>719320124it's free if you know where to look retard-kun
>>719320537>Soulsplayers will eat up anything and they know thatthis, fromsoft is in the same place blizzard used to be with their playerbase (autistic manchlidren) which will eat up every nugget of shit they produce and lick their fingers afterwards. why should the games be cheaper or go on a sale more often?
>>719320124Because you touch yourself at night.
Be happy that it's not $80
>>719320124because it's baby's first souls game (I guess 2nd now that ER exists) so a lot of retards will buy it regardless of the price
Because I havent bought it and they are forced to keep it at such a high price to make up for my lack of presence after DS2.
>>719323079played it recently, literally every fucking pvp in that area is either a cheater or a total meta slavei didnt know about wex dust when i played, idk if that changes anything
>>719320124namco is greedy. publishers are greedy. vidya ain't a charity and they're sick of having to try and cut you deals. they begrudgingly offer sales, look at how shit steam sales have become over the years. that being said I bought this game + dlc for 15 dollars on sale one year so I can't complain personally but you just know they're going to release a remaster at some point and double/triple dip you on the same content because again they're greedy.
>>719320124People keep buying Souls games.Just wait for sales.
>>719320124Pretty sure they bumped up the price when ER came out because they figured the massive influx of players would want to play Dark Souls after they're done with ER (they're probably right).
