>mfw playing classic diablo II>mfw picking barbarian thinking cool they would have skills for every weapon being their niche >mfw they not only don't have any actual skills for two handed axes but have shouts & two handed weapons instead What was blizzard smoking with these skill trees,at least you can stick gems into your slotted greataxe & have an ice/thunder combo
>>719360419combo necro + druidnecrodruid
They wanted to keep the trees consistent.How many skills would dedicating them to particular weapons eat up? How any skills would that leave you after you have picked a weapon?
Bump
>>719360419They didn't put thought into the skills. Barbarian was a mistake. Actually, a lot of classes have this problem. For example, Amazon has shitload of skills which are useless and do no damage, and passives that you need only 1 point in and one passive that is detrimental (block while running or something). Druid and Assassin are somewhat fine with their skillset: skills like Dim Vision have at least some niche use.But this thing is actually nice. You have to determine and find the build that is optimal and it is not easy if you play blind and don't use wiki and guides. Modern games have options that are equal, you can use any skill and equipment, and your efficiency will be the same.
>>719360419Weapon specialization passives were a big mistake.woop, I get to spend 20 points on a boring passive with the result that the so called "weapon master" is incompetent with all weapon types but one.Actually, the way the skill trees are divided is pretty dumb too. They should have realized that a third of the Necromancer's skills being curses was a bad idea. WoW style tree theming would have worked better (for example offense/defense/misc.) Sorc and druid trees probably work the best. I realize the whole skill tree concept was pretty novel at the time, but still.
>>719360419Niggadin is the only option for me.
>>719363805Did IV ruin him?
>>719360419>Classic DiabloAh! A man of taste.>IIShit taste is a taste, I guess.
>>719360419Barbarian attack skills can use any melee weapons. Why would you want skills to be limited to one weapon and give you less options? It would give less build variety. The game is from 2000, it used sprites and most melee skills between all the classes just recycled the same attack animations with varying speeds.
>>719363910There is no Paladin in Diablo 4.
>>719363910There is no Diablo 4 and Diablo 3 was cancelled.
>>719363805It's crazy how the Zakarum church never recovered from their total fucking at the hands of Mephisto in 2.
>>719364716III was fun though.
>>719364716Hah it's the one with the most lore though shame about lean
>>719363406Wait I thought amazon could reck stuff with bows if you picked the right skills?
>>719365517he said some skills are useless, not that the class is useless>>719363406I dunno if having crap skills that you should never pick is a good idea either, then everyone has to adopt a meta and end up with the same char
>>719364634>>719364716There is a fourth Diablo.And it's called Immortal.
Why did only Diablo 1 have the Hidden? They were some of the spookiest enemies.Honestly, the other games could have used some more of that gothic spookiness that D1 had instead of being WoW-lite loot farming games.
>>719365804Both games had the goat monsters,no idea if 3 had them only had the chance to play the PS3 demo way back felt more like they tried changing things up & making the game more along the lines of gauntlet
>>719363923I like you.
>>719363406>But this thing is actually nice.Yeah I love when I pick something I like, but it's dogshit and I have to use something I don't like instead.
>>719365903They had a whole zone that was nothing but Goatmen in 3. One of tye better areas in it.
>>719365903The Hidden, Anon. The boogeymen. Not the Goatmen.
>>719364853until you reach a point where there's nothing to do except endlessly farm riftsat a certain point, doing the same content over and over but with slightly higher numbers each time gets boring
>>719366797Thanks anon
>>719367163>doing the same content over and overThat's literally Diablo 2.
>>719368520So basically every ARPG!?
>>719366001>not the psx version
Bumping for interest
an erotic version of diablo
>>719372501Probably a mod somewhere like hdoom, hdiablo
So how BAD is diablo 4?
>>719373542It's alright.
>>719366001I gotta pawn some of this shit!
beeg! beeg cleaver! killin' all my friends! couldn't stop him, had to run awaaaay!
>>719373542gameplay and the amount of customization is solid, visuals and tone are much better than 3. but it still ends up exactly like diablo 3 in the end game with a fuck ton of bullshit happening on the screen while doing trillions of damage a second.
>>719374363>trillionsgetting flashbacks to disgaea again
>>719360419Zookeeper, summoner or lighting storm sorc. Most kino
