[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Most of them, no. But they do contain art. Sometimes of exceptional quality. Pic related; when Nvidia 3D Vision was released, a simple pair of active shutter glasses could turn a work of expert modeling into a sublime experience, akin to viewing the real object - at a distance of a few feet, with arcminutes per pixel below 1, the human brain could truly experience the depth and detail of an sculpture - something the best VR cannot currently do. I had hoped, those many years ago, that the shutter method would endure (fuck that half-res polarized nonsense) because of what it can show the human mind. People watching Avatar (the blue cat people) for the first time in theatres were treated to this experience en-masse and then it died due to the cost (and thievery) of the shutter glasses. But o' if it had endured! Sure, we look silly with them on, but the satisfaction was immense. Long live game art; most of us have yet to experience it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.