Play Doom
where does the dark ages fit in that picture?
>>719509887Dark ages is unironically not “Doom”. It’s closer to a shitty warhammer spin off or something.
>>719509230I played doom 2 on hard the other week. It was good, but the early maps were way better than the later ones. It also made be really exhausted to the point where I don't wanna return to the series.
>>719509887it isnt a doom game so not in the pic
I liked 2016 better than Dark Ages and Dark Ages better than Eternal Eternal was too colorful and textureless and the carcass enemies were a real what were they thinking. I miss the prowler though
>>719513089>I liked 2016 better than Dark Ages and Dark Ages better than Eternalyou're such a faggot contrarian. no one forces you to bee like this.
>>719513189Hell Knights with eyes look derpy
Doom threads are what nu/v/ makes to pretend it still has any hints of good taste left and pretend this isn't a board of turbo casuals who slurp up gacha slop and straight up games for trannies like Deltarune, Danganronpa, Life is Strange or Overwatch
>>719509887It would had done fine as a Heretic reboot.It's funny because the game is bland enough that it won't kill the IP but not popular enough that Bethesda can whore it out.
>>719514817You did it champ.
>>719509230For me, its doom 3
>>719509887It's the least "Doom" looking and playing of the new Dooms. It would've been fine as a Quake game, but I still think the shield bit would've slowed the gameplay down anyway. Also the variable difficulty the devs made is essentially just them giving up on actually making a game with any real difficult encounters or memorable bits. If you can just change any little bit, then nothing you do in it can ever really be hard or easy.
Quake > Doom
