how could team cherry stab the gaming industry in back like this and give their game away for only $20?!how is mister shekelstein going to afford that third mansion if goycattle refuse to pay $80 for the latest slop?!
Based strayacunts shitposting shekelbergs to death
>>719528223Maybe they know it will sell like cupcakes and they make enough regardless even with lower price.
>>719528223So now it's just Nintendo insisting on selling games for $80?
I would be fine with the base price of games gradually increasing to account for inflation if not for the fact that it's still coming with day one DLCs, microtransactions, and gambling transactions that we've been told are there to offset development costs in lieu of raising the base price.
>>719528223>push games to 70$>everyone mad>push games to 80$ for less than a year during a complete drought of news releases >pulls back to 70$>everyone convinces thenselves that this the good ending
>Jason SchreierFuck that industry cock-sucker, just a fucking hand picket for mega-corps.
>>719528921pretty much this
>>719528223why would they? it's such a gamble whether or not a game is finished on launch, compatible with your hardware on launch, whether or not the servers will be supported a month after launch, you increase the base risk for $/hr for the consumer there will be a point where they find it too risky, they would rather buy 2 $40 than 1 $80 because price is hardly an indicator of quality for a game
>>719528921They did the same shit with fuel in my country>Go from $1.90 to $2.60 overnight>Everyone mad>Push back to $2.30>Everyone gaslights themselves into thinking this is goodOur ancestors used to behead politicians for raising taxes by 1%, are they proud of us now?
Retarded journalists casually forgetting the plan was always $80 games in 2027, at least based on the Sony leaks. Other companies just tried to jump the gun first.
>>719528921this was the plan all alongthey'll do it again in a few years
I remember games being 50 bucks on PS2, but Jak and Ratchet always released for 40. I still think that's the most you should pay for vidya.
>>719528921delete this, stupid goy
>>719528223oooommmmmmmmmm
