[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


if you dont like it you are reddit
>>
When everything is Reddit, nothing will be.
>>
Sonic 06 is unironically not a bad game. It has long loading screens and certain mechanics feel like they weren't thought through, but that doesn't automatically make the entire game terrible.
>>
I voluntarily started another run of Sonic 4 E1.
>>
>>719554090
Just reminded me to install project 06 on my new pc
>>
File: 1731934261651679.png (755 KB, 1469x802)
755 KB
755 KB PNG
>>719554220
>Sonic 06 is unironically not a bad game.
No anon, it is a bad game. It's okay if you enjoy it, it's okay if you see the potential, and it's okay that you enjoy the fan remake version of it, but that does not make it a good game retroactively. The game has so many fundamental flaws that even if it was actually finished, it would only be okay at best.

The fact is, Sonic '06 was released in the state that it was, and so you can't just judge it the way you "wish" that it was released. The game is blatantly half finished. The load times are literally hours long, and are a legitimate detriment to the overall experience. Just because you can tolerate them doesn't mean that everyone else can. Some of the mechanics aren't just not "thought through", they're downright broken, anon. Busted. Especially on the PS3, which is like half of the game's playerbase. And yes, when you add up all of these negative things, it does in fact make the overall experience unenjoyable, or, you know... a bad game. Maybe not the worst game ever. Maybe not even terrible, really. But Sonic '06 IS a bad game, make no mistake. And it's okay to admit that. There is a reason why people reacted the way they did to the game on its release, and it's not only because of "Sonic is LE BAD" game journos. The fans were feeling this too, at the time. Whatever you think about the Werehog, you don't turn around and make a game like Unleashed, where they clearly dumped millions into production values and game polish, if the previous game wasn't that bad, anon. You don't scramble to try and make the best Sonic game you possibly can in the years that followed Sonic '06 if the game wasn't "that bad." Maybe you weren't there for when the game released. That's okay. But do yourself a favor and look into it a little. See what fans and even journos alike were saying about the game on release. Get some perspective that doesn't come from zoomers on /v/ projecting their idealized version of the game onto it.
>>
>>719554090
Are people still in denial about the fact that this WAS "Adventure 3", they just didn't call it that because of the mid-00s idea that numbered sequels don't sell.
>>
>>719555163
>paragraphs of and images of seething along with hundreds of hours of crying on youtube
just admit you were filtered like the rest of the redditors
>>
IN HIS WOOOORL'D
(HIS WOOOOOORLD)
WHERE ONEEE IS ALLL
IN HIS WORLD
(HIS WOOORLD)
NEVER FEAR THE FAAAAAAALLL



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.