the more i think about it, this was the golden era for Handhelds and its been downhill ever since>Both had unique features that made owning them worth it>game output was fierce,Sony was new to the handheld game and threw all of the money they where making of the PS2 at it, Nintendo was feeling the competition and was going all out with DS titles>3rd parties where at their peak making games that rivaled home console versions>golden age for CFW, a fully CFW PSP was a godly device to own in 2006>properly priced, you wernt paying home console prices for handheldsevery day i miss it.
>>7196191583ds was a underpowered shitbrick and some really good game stuck on it like monster hunter 4u Atleast psp emulation is really good unlike shitDS
>>7196192893DS always was underwhelmingit didnt have the amount of games the DS had plus shit battery life and a gimmick that was meant to cash in on the short lived 3D fad
>>719619158The DS was really popular at the time but very weak. I can only think of a handful of games that were worth playing on the system, mostly nintendo in-house vidyas like Mario Kart or Pokemon. PSP was tons better, but missed out on many great ports because of the inferior DS selling more units.
>>719621621>The DS was really popular at the time but very weak.it was a slightly more powerfull PSXit didnt compare to the PSP sure but for the time that was some good shitit had just the right amount of power to make great games
The ds lite and the Wii aesthetically are pleasing to me. Also the ds lite is actually portable.
>>719624186dsi is simply better apart from fully native gba support>bigger and better screens>homebrew just with the sd card >fully matte or fully glossy instead of the weird half and half of the lite>better hinge
>>719619289It's hilarious how the earlier gen PSP had better graphics than the 3DS
>>719624883did we really need to go bigger? switch 2 is even bigger, handheld consoles are not portable anymore