The Anno 117 demo is available now!It's only 93 GB
>>719640235is this some rts slop?
>>719640312It's a sequel to the city builder Anno 1800.
Are these games good?
>>71964023546 to download. sadly it runs like shit even with dlss and doesnt look that much better than 1800 which ran fine even on toasters
only an hour and only 2 levels but so far seems good, performance was a bit iffy and the UI seems to be targeting consoles
>>719640638>doesnt look that much better than 1800
>>719640638>1800 which ran fine even on toastersWhat? No it didn't. It works my 3080ti pretty hard.
>>719640926you heard me. I dont need to look at peasants from 2 meters, I need the game to run well from birds view. and 117 currently doesnt>>719641065Im on 3070 and srsly had no issues, plus it scaled well on my older pc too
>>719641248>srsly had no issuesI didn't say I had any issues. Just that it's a resource-intensive game and there is no way it runs well on toasters.Unless you're talking about low graphics settings which I haven't used
>>719641442yeah no probs, just saying that 117 runs poorly even with low settings and thats not ok
>>719640235oooh
>>719641065How.... I maxed it with my 1080,Stop falling for the 4K meme
>>719640235Neat, I didn't know there was a new Anno game. Thanks OP
>>719640235Why the hell is a "demo" only available for a limited time? Do game companies just not want me to try their product?
Who asked for ground combat?In 1800 I made peace with everyone so could ignore combat and focus on what's fun, building your cities.
>>719641992It's also time limited to 1 hours kek
>>719642295Is this really the future devs chose? That we expected to buy every game without being given a proper chance to try it?
>>719641992free marketing, ubisoft are too poor to pay for real adverts now
>>719640517>>719640583Absolute dogshit soulless UI. Into the trash it goes.
