>Wasn't a classic monster hunter game according to Capcom president and Japanese fans>But /v/ for some weird reasons pretends it is, despite shit literally being structured like World and WildsWhy?Is it because it was the very first mh game for a lot of kids on /v/? And situation is similar to World fags complaining about Wilds without seeing irony?
>>7199276504u had the best story in a monster hunter gameworld and wilds wish they had a story half as good
>>719927782But it was same shit, with protagonist being the chosen one, instead of just hunter like in others mh games
>>719927650>has to make a new thread to keep the ragebait going Sad
anyone else get the ick when MH4 was first announced and tigrex started climbing vertically on cliffs? classic MH died for me that day.
Milds is the first good game. Everything Milds did wrong was already done in gens 1-5 so if you don't like Milds you never likes the series at all.
>>719927650because it's in a nintendo console and yes, probably the first for most children around here.Every time someone brings up the older games in the series, it's very easy to tell they didn't actually play the games.
4 sucks shit, 3ds dogshit game.
How wasn't it? Mounting was the only substantial addition that strayed from the formula. No open world or walk and talk slop like modern Monhun.
>>719929556>No walk and talk slop like modern Monhun.>4...anon
>>7199276504U is the best simply because I said so.
