OLED may not be as good as a very high end new old stock CRT. But its very close.
No thanks, I'll keep buying my cheap aoc minileds!
>>719941017Does text still look shit on them?
>>719941298If you get a 4k 27 inch. The high PPI mostly fixes it.
My phone is only five years old, but there are a bunch of burn ins on the top and bottom from the battery indicator and other things.Any benefits you get from OLED are overshadowed by the planned obsolescence of the tech.
>>719941298text looks fine on that Asus one
>>719941017>*burns*
>>719941017Motion blur out the wazoo, plus a list a mile long of other problems. They're terrible for gaming.Plasmas are still the best TV's for (HD) gaming.CRT for everything else (6th gen and below).
>>719941621>Any benefits you get from OLED are overshadowed by the planned obsolescence of the tech.Their lifespan is a fraction of LCDs. It's absurd. Especially considering they cost so much.
>>719941778>>719941621CRT had burn in also. Especially on monocrome monitors.
>>719941621You probably dropped it daily and shoved it in your dirty ass pockets and scratched the fuck out of it.
>>719941942that's not how it works
>>719942056It is if I say it is, twerp. *cracks knuckles, looking smug*
AAAAAAAA!
Techspot used extreme settings like full brightness on all the time and even after 15 months its very faint. My OLED tv got around 6 - 8 hours usage a day for almost 6 years and got no burn in. It was a bit dimmer. I am happy with 6 years. I sold it for a newer OLED tv
>>719941017>organicWhat the fuck? So it's alive?
Poorfags cope thread. Probably all have oled phones too.
>>719941062>pay 800$ for something that burns in within 6 months>pay 200$ thats better in every way but you dont get to be a faggot
>>719941017Not as good in motion clarity. Whenever someone figures out how to make Blur Busters CRT beam simulation/CRT 60hz simulation shader work flawlessly on OLED monitors with shaderglass app then we'll be finally in a more ideal place for high refresh rate OLED monitors. This is a major secondary reason i bought a 240hz 4k OLED monitor, despite knowing my framerates wouldn't be hitting that. To be able to run that specific shader that requires high refresh for optimal results. Or G-sync Pulsar OLEDs might be capable of something similar in the future so that has the potential to be exciting, i haven't seen how that works yet with my own eyes so it's hard to say.Last time i checked it had syncing issues, and i don't know if it ever got addressed. Link to it below:https://github.com/mausimus/ShaderGlass/releases/tag/v1.2.0-bfi-alpha1^ if this gets figured out then we're closed to not needing to discuss CRTs anymore in regards to gaming. If you got it working then maybe i did something wrong. 240hz is minimum.
>>719941895The only way to get burn in with CRT was to let it running at max brightness for over a year or so.OLED burns in after normal use in like 2 months.
>>719942709>OLED burns in after normal use in like 2 months.That's just a blatant lie
>>719942802
I finally bought into the OLED meme and I have to say I didnt notice a difference until I put the OLED right next to my old tv and played the same content at the same time. LCD is like everyone turned off the lights. I'll never go back
>>719942873Silly anon
>>719942975I'm just not really blown away by HDR. It wasn't some life changing thing. I don't really care about whether my content is in HDR or SDR in all honesty.
>>719943013There's countless of these lolFailed technology
>>719943343Another faulty monitor.Actual burn in does not go away.
>>719941017>planned obsolescenceI shan't pay. Simple as.
>>719943497lots of "faulty" monitors.These retards are literally paying premium to get fucked in the ass lol
>>719943610Most electronics have a one percent failure rate. Only people with problems will actually post threads about it. You won't here the other 99 percent with no issues.
>>719943756I'm sure 99.9999999999999% of OLEDs are perfect and never fail, that's why they're everywhere and replaced LCD back in 2006 when they first came out :)
>>719943849are you the same anon that's been plaguing these threads for ~2 years now?
>>719943141I'd be more interested in hdr if it was standardized properly instead of everything being a complicated mess like it is now
>>719945613are you the same shill that's been making these threads for ~3 years now?
>>719941298I've never looked into oled because I don't ever want to think about burn in, do they have clarity issues that results in blurry text or something?
Quality of your monitor dosent really matter. Games run like shit and video bitrate is horible. Only thing you need good monitor is if your work includes any kinda editing.
I'm thinking of getting a new TV soon, what display tech and brand do I get?
>>719945992QD-OLED and WOLED have a non-standard pixel layout that causes this fringing problem, most clearly visible with text.
>>719946595oh dear. is it just a current limitation of the technology, like they can't make the oleds as small as normal leds for the multiple subpixel lights per pixel or something?
>>719946101it's funny how poors always try and validate themselves not having anything good while imposing nobody else should have it either.
>>719946768I believe the problem is that software expects a LCD like pixel layout. Apparently developers can compensate for the different pixel layouts, which Adobe has done for example.
>>719947017wow I never would have thought about displays arranging all the subpixels completely different from each other. man, display tech is complicated
>>719941017Even if OLED didn't burn it, it still has>shitty pixel layout>VRR flicker>low luminance issues (dirty screen/black crush)>aggressive ABLand if you throw in inevitable burn-in on top of all that...are your "perfect blacks" really worth it?
>>719947229nigger we solved this years ago with simple RGB layouts in CRTs and LCDsOLED is just a piece of shit technology
>>719947590It mostly the response time that makes it worth it. Contrast is fantastic but like 90% of all content doesnt have pure blacks to begin with. Vrr flicker is a huge fucking problem tho.As a tv, I love it, its also great for more vintage gaming, but I still use a high end IPS for pc gaming
>>719947741response time is kind of moot when it still suffers from the inherent flaws of sample-and-hold motion display
>>719941621I have had this phone for seven and never had issues and I've never heard anyone with an oled phone having issues. You just had bad luck just like the people who get dead pixels after couple of years in their monitors do. This hardly means that the tech is somehow bad
>>719946768they have to make them flawed so they can sell the next generation
>>719947017>software expects a LCD like pixel layoutIf that is the case, shouldn't the display's firmware handle this by translating or emulating such a layout?
luv me oledluv me crtmuh ips is okay
>>719942135>roommate had to look at a still image of gay porn for 2 weeks every time he passed by Ah yeah, massive pwn
>>719941017>new old
>>719948548Don't you have some radium jelly to rub on your wounds?
>>719947590I have two monitors. a 43" VA and 48" OLED. The OLED wins on everything other than a handful of games in HDR. I won't be buying and LCD display again
>>719941062HOLY BASED
>>719948668good goy
>>719941017CRT is fucking dogshit
>>719942135It was probably a Plasma TV. It had the same problem OLED has.
>>719948731>seething poor
>>719948863I bet you don't even have $5k speakers lol poorfag
Isnt it fascinating that we achieved the best motion clarity and color with crt and plasma TVs and ever since then we've been trying to replicate it. It's like a lost technology
>>719948932Based coconut audio customer.
>>719948951crts struggle to even cover srgb, have major issues with brightness levels, are massive power hogs and have major issues in size scaling. Unless you want your 42" TV to weigh 200kg (KX-45ED1).
>casually mogs your $1000 OLED monitor
>>719948951There is no good reason we can't have 1000hz refresh rate LCD/OLEDs with our modern technology (at that refresh rate, sample and hold displays finally match CRT motion)
>>719948932like these?
when are we getting QDEL
>>7199491892 more weeks alongside microLED.
>>719949209microLED isn't coming to the consumer market anytime soonminiLED is too easy to scale up and it's dirt cheap, so prepare to see a lot more miniLED monitors, each new model with more LED zones than the previous one
>>719949189>QUANDELSHIEEET WE WUZ PIXELS N SHIET
>>719949181bass'd
>>719949298>zonesDoesn't matter - until you can do per pixel then it is just a stop gap.
>>719949368I don't think you comprehend the size of a pixel on a 4k displaypast a certain amount of diming zones, it would be indistinguishable from per pixel illumination in nearly 100% of all media content
>>719949496I hate that my cursor becomes dark in a black scene on my 4K QDEL TV with over 1600 zones
>>719949496>you imbeciles just can't comprehend what I can easily comprehend...white text on black will have blooming unless it's per pixel.
>>719949551That's a combination of dimming zones + algorithmthey could absolutely make it to where your cursor doesn't dim, but depending on the zone size there would be significant bloomeven your cursor is made up of several hundred pixelsI would say dimming zones the size of an average cursor would be the limit of what is needed
>>719949608white text on black will even appear to bloom on OLED due to the way your eyes work
>>719949651so adding even more blooming helps it does it?
>>719949675No, I'm saying it would be indistinguishable from OLED after a certain point of zone size.Per pixel isn't needed in a vast majority of use cases.
>>719949718>in a vast majority of use cases unless it's detailed white on black, like I said. You can double down all you like. You're still wrong
who here /preorder/it comes out at the end of this monthhttps://rog.asus.com/us/monitors/27-to-31-5-inches/rog-strix-oled-xg32ucwmg/
>>719949761Currently, the juice ain't worth the squeeze.
>>719943849These are very complex electronics retard, failures are expected and that's why warranties exist Are you comparing failure rates to chairs or something?You're not going to find the people who have no problems with their hardware praising it, learn what a negativity bias is
>>719949990IF GRAPH IS ONLY 2D LINES WHY IS TRIANGLE?!?
>>719949907 >it's down to priceyet again another poor trying to dictate what others should see/use/buy
>>719950059Doesn't need to be.
>>719948749You are fucking dogshit.
>>719949990>you only need grey blacks and 50nits
>>719950157Oh its much more than price
>>719950015Learn how OLED works and why it's a shit failed technology.Stupid fucking shill retard.
>>719950209>you only need grey blacksThat isn't that is being shown>50nitsWorked fine for 50 years.
>>719950243should I just get the aoc minileds then or wair for qdel
>>719943013Yeah a lot of those og g9 panels were trash. I have one and had to have the panel replaced because it shipped with a dead line of pixels down the screen. No QC on the originals. New panel is great, though.
>>719950243>It's failed because... I found some posts on Reddit >No it's not sour grapes >Posted from a 60hz 1080p tn panel
>>719950438Sour what? any retard who bought these shitty screens report problems with them, whether it's burn in, visual glitches, low brightness.There's a reason most people still use LCD for their screen monitors you retard shill and it's not the price.
>>719950531You have people in this thread praising them and there are tons of redditors saying that tooYou're cherry picking you moron >There's a reason most people still use LCD for their screen monitors you retard shill and it's not the price.Because they don't know about them and don't think about it?Are you projecting your retarded mentality?
>>719950531Its the price. Gaming on an s95f is insane.
>>719950676>You have people in this thread praising themWhere? you're literally the only shill desperate defending them lol>You're cherry pickingI'm just proving you wrong.>Because they don't know about them OH YEAH IM SURE NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT OLED THAT CAME OUT 15 YEARS AGO LOLYou're so pathetic, are you indian? they shouldn't pay you for this shitty job at shilling saar
>>719950256>worked for 50 yearsyes. so did monophonic audio from a wax cylinder and AM radio
>>719948951>It's like a lost technologyit's shit technology, plasma had phosphor trails for fast moving images, and a slew of things that made it shit.
>>719950826...and the greatest movies and songs were made during that time and were expected to be played on such devices.
>tfw can't use oled as computer display because 14 hours of screen on time per day so it would burn in at 2 months
>>719950531>any retard who bought these shitty screens report problems with themI have had no problems in 3 years, screen looks as good as the day I bought it, 0 burn in 0 issues.what now?
Are there actually like, organisms in the OLED and shit? Whoa...
>>719950980post screenshot with it at max brightness on a solid color with timestamp or you're full of shit shill
>>719951090Consider that oled users have more culture growing in their screen than /v/ does on any given day.
>>719950745you're just proving that you're basing your understanding of technologies based on the experiences of redditors instead of people who actually test the burn in professionallyall you need to do to prevent it is run at a lower brightness, get some curtains to darken your room and set a screensaverbut you'd rather have your poverty phd because you badly need that affirmation that you're not missing anything
>>719951192>Still refuses to post proof>Still pretend he's not a shill>Still gets butt devasted after getting called out for being a shitskin indianKEK, they didn't send their smartest pajeet
>>719951239>completely pivots into his retarded vibes based jeetjacketing because he failed on the logical frontyou love to see it
>implying anyone needs more than a VA
>>719951321>Jeet shinsking absolutely MALDING after getting called outYou love to see it.Now that you finally admit you're just a shill we can finally move on and let your pathetic marketing thread die.You're not getting paid btw :)
>>719950879you still listen to monophonic records and watch B&W movies do you? don't talk fucking shit
>>719951357i miss when we used to have threads where people would actually talk things instead of retards like you trying to project being a tough guy
>>719951426>I miss it when I was on Reddit shilling my shit product :<
>>719941621Insane that products like OLED are even allowed on the market.
nearly 6000 hours on my oled monitor and still no burn in
>>719951461>it's shit because i don't have it and i want to hold onto the belief i still have bleeding edge hardware
>>719951583>le you cannot afford OLED in 2025 even though it's cheap and literally every handheld console and phone have them :<
>>719941017>But its very close.is what someone who doesnt know what sample and hold blur is would say
>>719951583my guy, the ps vita had an oled screen and that was ages ago
>>719951619>what is size and economy of scaleand yes, i doubt you can get a 4k240/1080p480 monitor so you are in fact copingas evidenced by how your accounts come from redditors lmaoyou're not talking anything technical, you're just on the ass end of the game of telephone
>>719951828>Muh 4KKEK, you're such a fucking retarded shill holy shit
>>719951867thank you for acquiescing that everything you don't like is a memedevelop some theory of mind for oncesee how you've gone from even talking about the subject matter to just 4k?
>>719952017Why would it matter if the OLED is 4K or not?Fucking retard.
>>719951867Kek what a poorfag. Sucks to suck, loser. 4K's been mainstream for like 9 years now I'm sure you can pick up some scraps secondhand like the thirdie you are.
>>719952067So true sis!
I 'member when people said 1080p was only for retarded consoomers and nobody EVER will need more than 1280x1024. Oddly when 1080p became dirt cheap this opinion vanished.
>>719952105>real men still use dual core phenoms, agp cards and CRTs!OK gramps time to go to bed
>>719952060because higher is just betterthere's no nuanceagain, why did you abandon talking about oleds entirely?
>people still use 1080p and 1440p ha ha
>>719952290>because higher is just better
>>719941834This is objectively wrong. OLEDS retain their brightness for years after LCD brightness plummets due to age. Having a bit of burn-in doesn't render the screen useless, you know that right?Just like when you buy a brand new LCD and the blacks are a bright navy blue, and the colours shift when you rotate the screen -- these are not ideal and look shit, but the screen still works. You can continue to use it.
>>719952432>tech of all things never progresses I AM NEVER OBSOLETEcope
>>719952175Its poorfag cope all the way down. At the end of the day, people like new things, they just cant always afford them.
>>719952471>watches 360p youtube video on his 4K TV
>>719942802A cheap OLED will burn in in like a week, speaking from personal experience
>>719952479Which baffles me, you can get yesterday's entry level HDR TVs for like $350 on sale. Which you can use to play vidya AND watch kino.
>>7199525904k HDR TVs that are like 65 inch* I mean
>>719952524but this is /v/? what is this retarded interjection? were you deployed here by your discord?
so why did we go through all this trouble to make new screen technology that's just worse than CRTs?
>>719952590Not everyone has space for more than a 24" monitor retard.
>>719952662Let's see your 65" CRT bro
>>719952708Yeah and not everyone is poor, what's your point
>>719952708Do you live in a closet? You can get wall mounts, you know?
>>719952662the only way in which a crt is better, motion clarity, is humanly imperceptible and it's down entirely to the way monitors even render shit
>>719952534>>719942802Samefag
>>719951102>jump through these hoops so I can still not believe you anyway.nah im good, I really hope you figure out whatever problems you have with this specific display technology anon.
>>719954169>I can't prove it because I'm a full of shit indian shillThanks for letting us know
>>719952715
I want an old console but I don't have a screen that can take analog inputs :(
>>719955480use a converter
>>719955637Are converters any good now? I remember buying one about 15 years ago for a Wii and it was horrible, the image was completely broken.
>>719955841Retrotink. They have models for all needs.
>>719955905Negro I am not paying those prices lmao.
>>719954223I will. 6k hours as a monitor on mostly desktop.
>>719956636>no timestampNice google seach image faggot
>>719956712>hurrr durr hurr durrr durrrretarded poor
>>719956756>Gets called out for making shit up>p-p-poorf-f-fag!KEK, indians are so retarded and low IQ.
>>719957350>y-y-you're indian you must be a complete loser if an indian has better stuff than you
>>719958590OLED are cheap as fuck, if anything, you're the indian pajeet who can't afford it lol
>>719959571>posts 4 image of screen >y-y-you can't afford itI can see you're another brainless retard. no wonder you're poor as fuck
>>719959739>posts some shitty google search image>those are totally mine btw haha :)Poor AND retardedWhat an awful combination
>>719959876>I just can't believe anyone can own an OLED monitor This is your brain on poverty meals I guess
>>719960074Stop projecting your poverty Ranjesh
>>719960135>look ma, I called him an indian againfunny how the worst insult you can call someone is an indian, you're clearly a paki
>>719956636which model
>>719960186>muh pakiKEK so you ARE a shitskin india after all.
>>719960230LG GQ900
>>719960281>LG
>>719960318?
>woled
