Linux Gaming thread
>>719992663TF2 crashes when not ran in -windowed mode on their new Vulkan port.
I don't know why they just don't offer a kernel that can have the installed anti-cheats to play games and still have the mainline kernel for all the people who wish to LARP as a political dissidents worrying about the glowies using the anti-cheat to bug their toilets.That way the people who just want to game can and the people who want to LARP as Che get what they want.Give people the choice you know. Because they keep saying Linux if freedom, but all that freedom seems to be is the freedom to do exactly as the Linux activists say.
>>719993351 the apis anticheats use to detect cheats and protect themselves dont exist in the linux kernel
>>719993516They are fundamentally x86-64 computer code. You cannot tell me that all the bragging the Linux community does on a daily basis could not create a bit of code to translate APIs or implement the sys_calls to POSIX.Remember the WINE team shitted on the guy who made DXVK. Yet that landed him a permanent job at Valve.In my view it is anti-freedom, for a upstart activist to tell me what i can and can't do with my computer. Faggots on Github don't get to decide what games i play and what ones i don't.
>>719992663When will Linux get anti cheat support?
>>719994301Hopefully never and I hope game companies adopt server sided AI probability based cheat detection instead, but this requires more computation and costs on their side so they'll just keep stonewalling Linux as a whole and only allow Windows + TPM + Secure Boot and Linux VMs like Stadia and GeForce Now teehee.
>>719994301When Windows boots them out of the kernel and they have to use standard APIs like on MacOS. Then in twenty years, we will have implemented those APIs
>>719993351>Why can't we just have a less secure kernel in addition to regular Linux?You can. It's called the Windows NT kernel. Literally just keep a Windows drive and dual boot if you're addicted to games that need anti-cheat. You know half the developers of such games would just continue saying "no" to Linux even if there were a viable anti-cheat solution anyway, because even verifying it works isn't worth 1% oops now it's 2% oops now it's nearly 3% but still a small proportion of potential players. If they're not willing to invest the time and energy in convincing themselves that Linux users aren't cheating, they'll just put some kind of `if isWine() { crash(); }` in their code for the peace of mind. Meanwhile, if the Linux kernel developers (who are not your slaves) don't feel like working on features that most Linux users don't want and most game developers wouldn't bother to use, all you (collectively i.e. the people who give a shit) can do is implement it yourselves, and you won't.
>>719993895Kernel level code is extremely complicated, so it's not as simple as wine/proton. And if you don't get the approval of the anti-cheat devs first, they'll just detect and ban it because they'll se it as a workaround.
>>719994301Wrong question. Nothing about Linux fundamentally blocks anti-cheats from working. The right question is when anti-cheats will get Linux support, and that's honestly not far off. Linux is getting to the point in marketshare where you're throwing away money by not supporting it. I'd say in a few years the most popular anti-cheats and even shit like photoshop and ms office will have Linux versions.
>>719994301Never. The more popular Linux gets, the more Microsoft will incentivize developers to not support Linux.
GNU Gaming thread
>>719992663What's up with the embed?
>>719995049>I'd say in a few years the most popular anti-cheats and even shit like photoshop and ms office will have Linux versions.Just like how the year of the Linux desktop is right around the corner.You Linuxfags are delusional.
>>719992663Bazzite has worked pretty well for me so far, but thinking of stepping into a less locked in version.Its a derrivitive of Fedora I know, and I assume with KDE it will be approximately the same.One of the reasons being that I'm not quite ready to swap my existing HDDs over from NTFS and the Bazzite people apparently refuse to support it. Have a spare WD 6TB I could slot in, only reason I haven't is the cables from the three in it would need to be rearranged or swapped out for a different shape. (Two angle down at the HDD plug in, one doesn't.)The SSD the distro is on only has the distro and a couple steam games on it, though it has a fun habit of creating redundant boot entries in the bios, was up to 22 last I looked. Cleared them out with efibootmgr, but fuckin annoying.
>>719992663What Linux should I use?
>>719994830>Kernel level code is extremely complicatedThat is not what all the bragging from FOSS devs tells me.They brag they can code a way to Mars in a day and constantly trash talk Telsa and Elon Musk.Are you saying they have coding stolen valor and are posers?
>>719995387Is it being my only installed OS delusional?Is 4% desktop marketshare a lie?
>>719994828>that most Linux users don't wantSo appointed you the voice of the community?Do you have any evidence at all that the Linux community is against implementing the sys_calls needed for anti-cheat?
>>719995320QRD? Is this a glowie thread?
>>719996483Mint for beginners. Arch if you wanna join the linux autists and make a DIY OS. They look pretty kino, but I can't be bothered. Mint is a good transition from W10 to linux.
>>719997391why is fedora not often recommended
>>719997508they're autistic about proprietary codecs
>>719996858You're right. I was speculating (based on the fact that people who use Linux are by definition choosing to use an OS which lacks the feature in question), and shouldn't have stated it as a known fact. The actual proportion of existing Linux users who want the kernel opened to anti-cheat was just so not the point of my post that I didn't bother to add a "maybe" or whatever would have fixed that sentence. If indeed most users want it, then the developers should consider implementing it. But they would also need to consider whether game developers will use it or allow its use (i.e. what >>719994830 said if you read the whole post instead of stopping at the first comma like the guy who wrote the first reply to it). On top of that, none of this matters if the kernel developers feel that such a thing conflicts with their vision for the kernel, because they are not slaves and can say "fuck off and fork it" to anyone demanding features they don't like.
>want to switch>favorite game won't run on linux
>>719997508Red Hat are niggers
>>719997892>favorite game won't run on linuxany game*
>>719997663It is really funny that being a pureist auststic on Linux just makes your computer fucking unusable, and the only reason they do it is out of pure spite stubbornness.Nobody fucking cares if the media codecs are proprietary.> their vision See that is what the problem is. "Their" vision.They may as well come repo my computer because it sounds like they own it going by those words. I don't care about their stupid autistic vision. I just want the fucking anti-cheat to work. I did not sign up to be part of their activism. I just want to play games on Linux.I have 0 freedom to do it, because they are stubborn faggots who have hijacked my computer in their stupid made up 3d chess game to spite Bill Gates.
>>719997391/g/ is super anti Red Hat and they hate corpos having influence over the Linux space.Outside of 4chan Fedora gets recommended a lot, to the point where I've seen more people talking about it than Ubuntu these days.
>>719998139>the only reason they do it is out of pure spite stubbornness.It''s because Red Hat is an American company and including H.264 in your software is a legal minefield thanks to the way software patents work here. RPMFusion can get your codecs in one command and it works flawlessly afterwards but the OOTB experience gets sacrificed a bit.
>>719998178meant to reply to>>719997508
>>719998415> legal minefieldThat nobody has challenged in any real court.It is all armchair lawyering that made up that "rule".
>>719998178>they hate corpos having influenceNo they just hate the "wrong" corpos having a say./g/ sucks the corpo boot if you give them an excuse.
>>719996898It's BBC Anime porn
>>719998139>They may as well come repo my computer because it sounds like they own it going by those words.No it doesn't. It just sounds like you don't own them or their time. You can feel free to tell them you want something, and they will either implement it or not. They don't owe you anything except for, per the software license, the right to fork the kernel -- which you (or someone who agrees with you) can do at any time if you and Linus Torvalds disagree on what should be done.>I don't care about their stupid autistic vision. I just want the fucking anti-cheat to work. I did not sign up to be part of their activism. I just want to play games on Linux.What activism?>I have 0 freedom to do it, because they are stubborn faggots who have hijacked my computer in their stupid made up 3d chess game to spite Bill Gates.Bro you need to calm down and look at the fact that you are crying about YOUR freedom because other people won't do free work for you. Again, you literally have the freedom to fork the kernel and implement it yourself, or fund someone else to do it. Moreover you have actual autism if you believe that your freedom is under attack just because other people aren't writing free software in the way you want.
>>719997508because it's not stable and will break on update.just recently fedora got a newer kernel update faster than arch and there was a regression in bluetooth/wifi stack, breaking shit.just use mint with cinnamon, seriously.
>>720000958Not him, but tempted.I assume it plays well enough with Steam and its attempts.
>>719999296>BBCThe dick is grey.
>>720000365>people aren't writing free software in the way you want.They should be writing software to enable freedom as their slogans say. But they write software to put out their personal software politics and edicts really.The biggest trick the linux activist ever pulled is to say they are here to free you from the Microsoft walled garden. You are just in a Linux walled garden, they just try to hide the walls with slogans.
>>719997892The Linux Experience
I bought a mini pc to put linux on. Few questions: First, Is bazzite a good OS? I have basic linux knowledge, but not too much. Second, what's the best proton to use on Steam? There's a long list I believe. Finally, recommend cheap games to play or cool linux wallpapers :)
>>720005437kcd 1 is cheap and goodi use proton-cachyos but proton-ge is good too
wtf is wrong with you people
stop it nigga wt f is happenign
linuxsisters...is this our legacy?
does pee still work then? i forgot all about it after i built a new pc
>>719992663Sauce on the embed?
>>719992663what's the better type of distro for gaming? stable like mint, or rolling like arch?
>>720009618both, they are perfectly plappable as gaming distros but arch might go slightly harder because it's always up to date
Is there actually something embedded in the OP image?
>>720010143No they fixed that didn't they?
>>720010185I'd thought so.
>>720010241Yeah I think people just post that now to troll or make people paranoid
>>719992663Has nothing to do with gook shit. Don't make threads.
>>720010307What is it about Linux threads on here that brings out so much trolling? I don't get it.
>>719992663post the gif
Is 16GB of RAM not enough? I got another set to push it 32GB and all my problems are gone now
>>719992663how difficult is it to get niche RTS/FPS games to run on linux?
>>720010603i got you.
>>720010660without knowing the specific game its hard to tell you haw well it works. the furry overwatch clone as a third peson shooter seems to work on linux and its pretty niche. other than anticheat I dont see any reason why they wouldnt work
>>719997508What >>719997663 said. They focus on purity over convenience.
>>720010937Dumb penguin
>>720010143other posts had it but jannies deleted the embedded shit
>>720010603No, I got you.
>>719994301Why would you want that? Just look at BF6. They doubled down by requiring secure boot along with a kernel level anticheat and still had day one aimbots.
>>719994301We don't need anti cheat we need the hammer of the state brought down on cheaters
