What do these 3 games have in common?
>>720062532all shit
>>720062532The rating
>>720062532Endless, insufferable shilling on this board
>>720062532They're all pointless
>>720062532/v/ hates them
>>720062595delta is quite good, you just suck dick.
>>720062595REmake 4 is pretty gooddon't know about the other two
>>720062595fpbp
>>720062532All 3 are shit remakes of overrated games?
>>720062703>>720062754shit eaters, both of you
they all look like they came from the same tailor
>>720062595>>720062603>>720062617>>720062664>>720062871>>720064091all of this
>>720062532They all have the letter "e" in the title at least 2 times
>>720062532>watch some of the RE4 remake on youtube>dialogue sounds Californian as hell>Leon curses like a Netflix cartoon character>le realism replacing the stylish action of the OGyikes
>>720062595/thread
RE4 and Dead Space are top-to-bottom remakes, while Delta is just a graphical update.
>>720062595Dead Space remake and RE4 remake are both better than the originals
>>720065634wrong
>>720062532They're all Nortubel tier remakes
>>720062532Unnecessary remakes?
>>720062532They're all unnecessary remakes that still manage to be better than the original game?
>>720066352how can something be both unnecessary and better at the same time?
>>720066405I don't know how this is confusing for you. If my house isn't in need of a repaint, but I repaint it anyway, and it ends up looking better than it did before, then it was unnecessary, but still an upgrade.
They're all unnecessary remakes but still pretty good.
>>720062532they're third person...they're not all the same type of remake or the same type of remaster though, in fact as far as I know only RE4 is an actual remakeRE4 is very good for what it does, and does the original game differently, is its own experience.MGS Triangle is literally an Oblivion style remaster, with tiny amounts of remade elements. It is the same base engine or at the very least all the preserved animations/physics/etc. with UE5 sloppa as a paint job. To be fair to it, it *is* actually pretty faithful to the game, and not censored (with the exception of jiggle physics on Eva, which could just be soulless laziness).From what little I know about Dead Space, it's not only worse in most ways including major ones like lighting, it's also censored/propagandized.
>>720062532Re4 demake sucks Dead space demake sucksMGS remaster is pretty food
>>720067341You're completely wrong about Dead Space. 1. The bit about lighting is straight up untrue. 2. It's not censored at all.3. By propagandized I'm guessing this is about niggers and women on posters. Both versions of the game put the game devs on posters and put those around the ship, it's just the remake had more blacks and women on staff and thus on the posters.In terms of gameplay (the only shit that actually matters) the remake is a resounding upgrade. Better in basically every single way.
>>720062532All are good?>>720062595FPWP
>>720067024this is the right answerI also want to remind the thread that MGS4 is kino and if you don't like it then you aren't really an MGS fan and have shit tastethanks!
>>720062532>shit remakes of shit gamesPut SH2 in there
>>720067661>pretty foodbut what does it taste like?
>>720062532They were all completely unnecessary
>>720065980Nortubel is a remake?
>>720062532all in rectangular boxes
>>720062532pointless demakes when the originals are still available and easy to buy(also, you forgot the DeS demake, SH2, Oblivion demastered, etc)
>>720062532they all have pretty grafix but one of them isn't a full remake like the other two are.
All straight white males
Made by talentless jeets
>>720062532All got a remake nowadays
