[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1000262512.jpg (280 KB, 1170x1445)
280 KB
280 KB JPG
discuss
>>
Far cry 2004
Never played any of the others
>>
>>720134378
There was a 6?
>>
>>720134378
far cry instincts predator
>>
>>720134378
2>1>3. I didn't the play the others
>>
Original and 3.
>>
Farcry 1 or 2
the rest are pretty fucking awful
>>
Far cry 3 was my favorite because it was my first and the revenge story made more sense. I did love far cry 4 as well as the setting/music were phenomenal.
>>
>>720134378
3 is the best overall.
>1 is a tech demo
>2 is a bunch of good ideas implemented poorly
>4 and onwards are just 3 copy/pasted
>>
File: TRVKE!.gif (1.34 MB, 498x374)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB GIF
>>720135347
FC2 is especially disappointing with shit the economy is
>>
3, blood dragon and primal (survival mode)
>>
>>720134378
2. By far. It was a great game with excellent shooting mechanics. 3, 4, 5, 6, Primal, Blood Dragon, New Dawn, etc are all the exact same boring game.
>>
>>720134378
Far Cry 4 has the best combat. It's the first one that lets you shoot while driving, the skills are more fun, and so are the missions. The map feels more alive with the addition of money trucks and whatnot. 2 and 3 are still great and were probably innovative for the time, but I didn't play them when they released, so I can't take the timeframe into account.
1 was okay, and 5 was so ass it scared me out of playing 6.
>>
>>720134378
These games have been identical since 3. Stalest franchise of all time.
>>
>>720134378
2>Primal>Blood Dragon>3>4>5.
Never played 1, 6 or thee one with the black twins
>>
>>720134378
far cry 3
cause i like the map,graphics and vaas
>>
>>720134378
2.
>>720134473
Yes. It's terrible.
>>
>>720134378
I liked 5's setting since I grew up in Montana and the evil bunker cult was a cool idea for a villain. But I do think 2 and 3 are the best ones. I played maybe an hour or two of 6 and got bored almost immediately so I doubt I would ever play any more unless they seriously change the gunplay and everything else.
>>
>>720135567
>Respawning outpost
>Dead fucking world
>The entire gun jamming mechanic and ammo management is worthless
>Malaria is utilised like shit
>>
>>720135709
its basically assassins creed with guns since then
>>
>>720134378
4, it lets you skip the bullshit and have the good ending by just being polite and having dinner.
>>
Played 3, got all the pelts and most other stuff. Then quit the game after you got the wingsuit, somehow the game wasn't any fun with an actual wingsuit. Heard lots of praise for 5 but it's just more of 3, didn't click with me.
>>
>>720134378
Only played the first two, so 2
>>
>>720134378
2 and 5. Redneck wilderness was kino
>>
>>720135991
Coolest map. Best gunplay. Most unique game in the franchise. They don't make them like this anymore. It was its own thing and it took risks. Ever since 3 they have just copypasted the same inferior gameplay every time. Hell, Primal even uses the same map as 4 but mirrored/upside down.
>>
File: 1739967561470014.jpg (34 KB, 375x439)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>start playing 3
>your wallet can only hold 1000 bucks
>"find 1 x baby foreskin to hold 2000 bucks"
Stopped playing right there
I have never seen a more retarded design decision since
>>
>>720134378
2 but I havent played any since 3.
I tried like 30 mins of 4 and turned it off.
I played a lot of 3s multiplayer but 2 is perfect minus the issues like insta respawning enemies and shit stealth.
>>
>>720136071
>Try the crab rangoon
>Win
>>
File: 1730936715647918.png (299 KB, 546x546)
299 KB
299 KB PNG
>>720134378
2 even if I'd call it a 6/10 game at best. I like that missions aren't really railroaded, and Africa is a godlike setting that offers some of the best scenery. 2's biggest flaw is the lack of mission types because you'll just spend the whole damn game traveling to some base or outpost to blow or kill whatever is marked with a red circle on your map. The game also could have more ways to interactive with the world like having enemies actually belong to factions and engage in firefights or animals being more than just set dressing. 3 wasn't bad, but it felt like at that point stealth became overcentralizing and just trivialized the game for you.
>>
>>720134378
1) dad's game, fully in my generation but he didn't want us playing it so i missed the boat on that one
2) malaria simulator, love the diegetic map, fire spread, level editor but the story was a slog and the gunplay is give and take
3) hated the antagonist and not in a well written 'your supposed to hate him' kind of way he just seemed very closeted and i didnt like that, it was very much ubisoft tower slop but the gameplay is very satisfying and its probably my favorite
4) didnt even play it the antagonist seemed even gayer and i just dont want to be close up with some faggot sniffing me, i did enjoy looking up a blind speedrun on launch week and discovering it has that do nothing good ending bit though
5) lotta shirtless dudes who keep acting like gay rapists in that one, gameplay was absolute nirvana though from comfy fishing with generic npc companions to skydiving shovel launcher attacks it was just a joy to play
pretty 50/50 on the story some anons seem to think it was unironic kino but i just dont see it
6) skipped this one, as i understand it farcry has fallen down the slippery slope and is now unrecognizable slop
>>
>>720135989
hello fellow montanan
i picked up 5 on sale for the setting too, but i basically booted it up, looked around a bit, went "yup" and quit playing it
lmao
>>
2 > 4 > 5
fuck the rest
>>
Modern ones all feel like the same game, but probably 4 or 5. I don't understand why people love 3 and the old malaria simulators are shit. 5 could've been amazing without the fucking atrocious forced capture sections and then the insanely retarded idea of you escaping only to get recaptured. I don't remember shit about 4 except the bonus ending and I think it had war elephants.
>>
>>720136340
That's what I did, then I uninstalled the game and never played again. I came to lay down my mother ashes and say hi to dad, not waste my time getting tangled in some drug feud.
>>
>>720137091
You missed out on killing the feminist bitch and imposing based tradcon patriarchy in the nation.
>>
>>720134378
5
>>
>>720134378
The first one.

Other FCs I played: 2, 3, BD.
>>
>>720134378
4 had a certain charm that tied its themes together. 3 and to an extent 5 were a little too over the top for their choice of setting. 6 was woke liquid ass.
>>
>>720137550
I don't want to deal with her, let dad deal with it.
>>
File: download (3).jpg (1.08 MB, 4434x1381)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB JPG
Primal because the stone age is a excellent setting
>>
>>720134691
Based
>>
>>720136230
Africa was boring as shit man, but you're right on the gunplay. FC2 is a game that seems like it was supposed to be more hardcore than it actually is.
>>
Far Cry 4
>The Setting
>The Story
>The Characters
>>
Farcry 3 did a lot of damage to the series in hindsight
>>
>>720139047
Only Ubisoft's laziness, lack of ambition, and refusal to ever do anything but cut corners and copy+paste so they can release games yearly/every other year. 3 was a fine game and it's not our fault that they've just reskinned it a dozen times since.
>>
Far Cry 1 is the best one. It's basically Crysis 0.5.
>>
Farcry and Farcry 3 were the only good ones
>>
Primal because of best girl
>>
>>720134378
2 and primal
the rest of the series sucks
>>
File: Far Cry Primal.webm (3.76 MB, 1920x1080)
3.76 MB
3.76 MB WEBM
I like Primal
>>
>>720142324
would rape then feed to a tiger
>>
>1-2
no one alive have played those
>3
the game that cursed the franchise with fame
>4
3 again but better
>5
long intro but the best
>6
if it ain't broke, break it
>>
Is Primal actually worth playing if I think 1 & 3 were the only good ones?
>>
6 could have been good but I hate that all the guns are literal junk.
>>
>>720142608
it's basically just cave man unga bunga simulator
so if that interests you, go for it
>>
>>720142728
Yeah but is it actually that, or just another Ubitower finder with animals for vehicles
>>
>>720142608
It's better than it has any right to be.
>>
>>720142608
It's boring as fuck. The setting is mildly cool, but that's all it has going for it. Consider that you get three weapons (because stone age technology), so you better like hitting things with a club, using a bow, or stabbing with a spear. If you played 4, it's also the same map.
>>
>>720135989
>>720136737
A shame your state is being overrun by trust fund kids and rich city pricks who drive up the cost of living cause they wanna larp Yellowstone
>>
File: epic.gif (10 KB, 375x357)
10 KB
10 KB GIF
>>720134378
1 and 2 are kind of in their own league. If you like big maps but not in an open-world sense, you might like them but otherwise they are kind of bland.
3 was the most fun.
4 was the comfiest, if a bit boring.
5 had the coolest setting. Also somehow more boring than 4.
I never played 6 because spoilers, I got bored of Far Cry.

Blood Dragon is still the best Far Cry game.
>>
>>720134378
Far Cry 6 is basically "everything good gameplay-wise about Far Cry 5 but improved and in a more interesting setting than fucking flyover America" but it wastes its setting and has an anemic cast on both the supporting and antagonist side because they wanted to milk Giancarlo Esposito's stunt casting.
>>
>>720143213
The people who hate on primal have the most retarded takes
>same map
It feels completely different from 4 both in visuals and how it's traversed
>lack of weapons
The weapons are distinct and feel great to use, the guns in every FC game are just a bunch of shitty reskins
>boring
If you have ADHD sure
>>
>>720135991
>Respawning outpost
It's a commentary on the cyclical nature of violence. If you listen to the Jackal tapes it becomes obvious
>>
>>720134378
2 was my first, I liked everything but the usas rusting after a mere 2 mags. Can't remember anything about 3 except the sky diving scene, 5 was comfy I liked the music/setting. Is 4 any good?
>>
File: 1756806519837662.jpg (29 KB, 480x360)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
2fags need to SHUT UP
>>
2 > 5 > the rest except ND > POWER GAP > ND
>>
3 over 2, but only just
I'm playing 5 but it's a bore. Can't imagine I'll bother wiht 4 or 6.
>>
>>720135347
Based homosex enjoyer.
>>
File: far cry 3.webm (3.92 MB, 900x370)
3.92 MB
3.92 MB WEBM
>>720149160
>>
>>720142324
Doesn't this game have primal sex in full display?
>>
File: images.steamusercontent.jpg (476 KB, 1920x1080)
476 KB
476 KB JPG
>>
>>720134378
5 is objectively the most soulful
>>
File: doesnotgiveafuck.jpg (11 KB, 283x356)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>720134378
>1
It's own thing, not really similar to the other games. Okay for its time, but the mutant stuff sucks.
>2
Not good. Lots of terrible designs decisions and bland missions. The best atmosphere of the series.
>3
Solid game that would would be copied 100 times.
>Blood Dragon
Shallow reddit shit.
>4
3 with a different skin. Not as appealing, every character except Pagan sucks.
>Primal
Weird to make a caveman game a shooter, but it at least felt different. Probably could've been its own franchise.
>5
3 again, but in a great setting. Wonderful soundtrack and fun shooting.
>New Dawn
Never played
>6
Complete faggot shit and boring.
>>
>>720134378
I enjoyed most of them fine but I really bounced off of 6. The shitty aesthetic of "muh Cubano living" is definitely a big part of it. Also none of the characters were that interesting and I got bored of the side content like halfway through. I really enjoyed 4 & 5 & Primal a lot more. Primal on "survival ultra hard" mode or whatever was actually a pretty novel experience, it was cool to play in early human shoes.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (285 KB, 1280x720)
285 KB
285 KB JPG
I got primal off of a sketchy website without any issue and if it wasn't for the DRM I'd get 4 solely for the Yeti DLC
I love Samsquantch in all it's itterations man, shits cool as hell
>>
>>720134378
Primal
>>
4 is basically 3 with a different map, more guns and rideable elephants so IMO despite the jeets 4 is better than 3
>>
>>720134691
Same and this. The others are cucked and downgraded. Two will always be one of the most immersive games I've ever played.
>>
>>720151853
Call me fragile all you like but i couldn't continue with 6 after one of the main quest givers is revealed as a tranny freak and entire misson based around defending the hospital they had their tits removed at while the doctor who did it tells you how brave they are

This is not a joke
>>
>>720134378
5 was sick. These days /v/ is usually right, but the hate for Ubisoft is sometimes wrong.
>>
>>720153039
5 was casualified in a good way, just raw action with light open world looting

Microtransactions is why it was hated though
>>
>>720134378
3 and 4 are the most fun but mostly because they feel like the same game. They also play the smoothest.
>>
File: 1757359331711382.jpg (8 KB, 221x228)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
3>blood dragon>5>4>primal>6>2>1
>>
>>720134378
>1
Decent game but outdated. Nobody played this
>2
Niche, a diamond in the rough
>3
The popular kid with memes
>4
The less popular but smarter brother
>5
The crazy but cool uncle
>6
The distant cousin from another country
>Primal
The local stray
>Blood Dragon
Your first crush
>New Dawn
Your ex
>>
File: better than a console.jpg (181 KB, 2163x902)
181 KB
181 KB JPG
I don't think she understands how reproduction works.
>>
>>720135347
If 3=best and 4/5/6=3 then 4/5/6=best
>>
>>720134378
4
2
3
5
1
6
>>
>>720134691
This
>>
1 was the best until the game fucked itself with those mutant enemies
>>
>>720134378
3, perfect setting, solid protagonist
>>
>>720134691
Based, stole my answer exactly
>>
2, Primal and 5 for the music

Rest can fuck off. Yes, the original too - it was never good.
>>
2 was my first Far Cry. Never beat it but it was my favorite. I can still hear the sound of the jeep despite not playing it for 15 years.
3 was fun and easy to be a completionst about, good tropical setting.
4 was really beautiful and perfected the gameplay/world of 3.
5 was trash and I dropped it a few hours in.
>>
>>720134378
5 and 3 are the only ones I've finished and 5 is pretty much the perfect game in the Far Cry series.
>>
>>720142437
Phew, I thought you were going to stab him at first.
>>
>>720154120
Honestly the fairest ranking. 4 refined 3's formula before it got too bloated and stale, and 2 had a raw direction that was even just as fun to start mindless town shootouts and try surviving.
>>
>>720134378
No primal? Also 2
>>
>>720134691
>>720138701
>>720152645
>>720154206
>>720154873
performative. claiming to like 2 and ESPECIALLY 1 is so fake. its like saying the witcher 1 is the best in the series. nobody cares nobody believes you.
>>
>>720159219
Having only played 2 it is by far my favorite. It's not stellar mind you, good and you can see where it could have been great. I do hope that one day it gets like a spiritual successor that is great



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.