8k 1000hz monitors are almost here. We need 6x and 8x frame gen to keep up, fellas...
>>720652689Current hardware can't even handle 4k and stable 120 fps. >inb4trannyframesYou will never have real frames.
imagine the computing power to generate even the fake frames
>>720652689Whats the point of Hz past 120?Maybe 240 if you are a Compfag who plays FPS.
>>720653026
>>720652689it's not enough until we get to 64k 2000hz hdr 10,000 microled tvs and monitors
>>720652895Fuck, it's worse than that. Before you even get to the hardware, current engines can't even handle 2k and a stable 60fps.
>>720653101>Memory is the same as refresh rate, because, IT JUST IS OK?!
>>720653310Concession accepted
>>720652689Counter Strike Chads about to be feasting playing on this at 240p
>>720653201it even worse, current hdmi specs can't handle that throughtput, so video is likely lossly compressed.also due to the throughput requirements, 8k 120hz cables can't be longer than 1m or signal losses make the image unstable.Also a lossless 8k at 1000hz is(7680 px width)x(4320 px height)x(3 bytes/pixels) x (1000 fps) = 92.5GB/s
>>720652689>8k 1000hz>We need 6x and 8x frame gen to keep up, fellas...More like 60x or 80x frame gen on a top of the line card. Maybe more.
>>720652689>ultrawideinto the trash it goes
>>720653339Memory is the bare minimum for games to even run and the requirement for them to be playable keep going up.You ether have enough memory or you dont and adding more memory does not help if you cant even fill up the current memory you have.No game (Other than some VR games) requires more than 60 fps (30 if you are a buck broken console fanboy) to be playable and frame-rates past 120 require a trained eye to even notice.I sometimes forget to turn 120 fps mode back on in some games on my gaming PC after i played them at 60 on my laptop because its just that hard to notice but i sure as hell would notice 30 fps compared to 60.
>>720653339I bet you also think your wife needs more than one boyfriend because having just one is outdated.
>>7206526898K displays have been around for over 10 years and nobody uses them.
>>720653101At the time, that was a true statement. He didn't say "for all time."
>>720654795mainly in TVswhen 4k release and 8k shortly followed, they had insane energy consumption. They are still around 200-300 Watts and you can double that for needing a device that generates the content.
>>720652689BoooI want more brighter monitors.
>>720652895it can if you play old games
>>720653026The only point of 1000Hz is to get rid of motion blur, so obviously using interpolated blur frames to fake 1000 fps is completely pointless.Ignore that the GPU power consumption to get to 1000fps will be like 10x what a fucking CRT would have used to accomplish the same thing.
>>720652689>memewide
>>720653912>(7680 px width)x(4320 px height)x(3 bytes/pixels) x (1000 fps) = 92.5GB/sNot even DP 2.x can handle that without compression. It's absolutely overkill.
>I play DS/PS2/90s and 00s games.Finally, a resolution and hz that befit my 9070 XT running DS games.
>>720663451Even with compression. That's 9.25x the data that can be sent over DP80 in absolutely perfect conditions.
>>720653101>>720654968>640 000 ASCII charactersThat is one novel
they need to make modern 16:10 monitors
>>720665393It was a meme pushed by Apple and Dell. They wanted to distinguish PC widescreen from TVs. A big selling point was stuff like PowerDVD would have the ability to shift the video to the top and let you have your navigation bar in an empty strip below it.As time went on, people realized that was dumb and nobody wants the controls on the screen all the time. Console games and movies were being made with 16:9 in mind, video would be letterboxed no matter what, and games would either be horizontally cropped or vertically extended (with no consistency).Eventually people decided it was gay. 16:9 monitors were creeping in even in 2008-9, with 4k monitors starting to show up even though 4k media was nonexistent (with games being unplayable at that resolution) and monitor scaling sucked horribly.
>>720652689Well, there is a reason why god did Super Mario 64 decomp
>>720653912it's not actually 8k. it's an ultrawide that's only 7680 on the horizontal axis. the vertical axis is much lower than 4320. display manufacturers are all lying kikes
>>720652689I'm still on an old TN 144h and I'm fine with it.
>>720652895>trannyframeskek
>>720652895I'm running 5 year old hardware that does 4k 120fps. I just don't play slop
would time and space bend?
I was one of the first to shill high refresh rate monitors back when they were only known to be good by people who played fucking CS 1.6 on CRTs and when they were advertised for nothing but fucking nvidia 3D vision and this is stupidly fucking pointless.
>>720652689And the fuck am I going to play on it? CS 1.6?I'm on 1440p120hz and there's no GPU on the market that would actually utilize it to the max in anything remotely modern that would actually benefit from it. No point in resolutionfagging in some old game where the textures are too small. Also older games don't benefit as much as you'd expect because all the improvement in hardware is new slopframes models so you can't brute force older stuff.You will play 720p30fps on recommended specs and you will be happy.
You don't need more than 240FPS the gains beyond that are practically indistinguishable
i bought a 165hz monitor years ago and played half life 2 on it and i think to this day that is the only game in my library that can run that kind of framerate
>>720652689>8k 1khz>rendered in engine at 480p 15fps and interpolated up
>>720671309I could run Quake on it.
>>7206526891000hz isn't overkill.It's how much speed we need to get rid of motion blur because LCD and OLED panels are so terrible.
>>720662104>10x what a fucking CRT would have used to accomplish the same thing.And Plasma.... which also had perfect blacks.
>>720652689>resolution higher than 4k>hz higher than 144congratulations you've been scammed for pixels you cant see and update rate you cant feel
>>720672479If you were alive in 2009 you would have said the same thing about 720p 60hz. Must suck to have inferior genes.
>>720672858obvious ragebait but there are actual people that think this way
literally no point going above 1024x768 40 hz
I'd rather we return to 4:3 than this fucking RETARDED nonsense. This shit looks so fucking stupid.
>>720653101>>720654968He never even said it at all. The quote is completely made up.
Anything over 144hz is a memeAnything over 1440p is a meme
Modernslop can barely run at 4k 60fps and a $3000+ card.
>>720673883 based and pre-XP pilled. all you need is 1024x768, 40Hz, a beige LCD, and a rattly dell keyboard to experience TRUE gaming. Quake runs buttery, StarCraft looks crisp, and you're not being gaslit by marketing goons selling you 8K slop. enjoy your timeless rig, king.
>>720652689I want to see Majoras Mask Recomp played on this. I bet it can achieve 1000hz
