[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Just stop it, /v/
>>
white people are weird
>>
the joke explained: trans
>>
>>720667840
Who the fuck is this "we", journalists aren't my people
>>
>why $120 games are actually a good thing
>>
reminder:
this article doesn't exist
this person doesn't exist
this headline doesn't exist
you're literally getting mad at an imaginary scenario
>>
what percentage of people are trans now, like genuinely? Are there exponentially more now than there were even a year ago, like wtf is going on with them being these forest gump ass characters in news stories and everywhere you look?
>>
Honest question, why do y'all hate transfolk? Especially when we’ve done nothing to you...
>>
>>720668262
they'll be all gone in 30 years more or less
>>
>>720668393
no they wont. they create millions every year
>>
>>720668220
Technically you're correct, the article doesn't exist - it's a video
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gasetyj3jRA
>>
>>720667840
Good thing Nintendo is proving all game are actually $110. but seriously, why would you ever listen to a woman?
>>
File: hab.png (683 KB, 771x819)
683 KB
683 KB PNG
Is this a cosplay?
>>
File: dfdff.jpg (7 KB, 299x168)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>"GAMES SHOULD COST $80"
>consumers spend the extra money
>all the extra cost goes to investors, CEOs, actors/talent, AI human replacements, and AIPAC membership
>none of the cost goes to developers who continue to crunch and not get paid well
>"YOU NEED TO SPEND MORE! DON'T YOU SEE WE CONTINUE TO SUFFER!!!"
>>
>>
>>720668220
lol retard
>>
>>720667840
I thought that was a prison shirt at first
>>
I think all games should be at least $100.
No, I take it back, $150. They'll buy it anyway, what's the harm?
>>
>>720668262
There aren't that many but you they are almost always lolcows so they have a massive presence on the internet.
>>
>>720668136
They don't mean it in the broad sense but the in the 'them' sense.
>"We journalists need to set the record straight to you"
>>
>>720667840
I wouldn't call it anticonsumer. Its just that most games are not worth their asking price
>>
>>720667840
>Leftist simping for the multi billion dollar corporation
Every fucking time...
>>
>>720667840
at least it has been a top tier year when it comes to anti-trans news. trump forcing their real gender on their passports was hilarious, even better now that even the uk defined what a woman is. trannies lost the war and are trying to hold onto what little power they think they got
>>
AAA niggers still can't achieve 1080p and 60 FPS on $80 games. They do not deserve money or respect.
>>
>>720667840
Remember, Polygon were initially funded by Microsoft.
>>
>>720667840
Gotta like how you can immediately tell it's a dude just from nearly scrolling past the thumbnail alone
>>
File: 1724133812757514.jpg (738 KB, 1440x1436)
738 KB
738 KB JPG
unless it's actual video game news like an announcement from devs, posting screenshots of other websites should be an executable offense
>>
>>720668530
>Just clickbait
Boring
>>
>>
yeah i'm never spending 80 fucking dollars on some UE5 game. no thanks
>>
>>720667840
>increasing prices is not anti-consumer
Holy retard.
>>
>>720667840
you will buy the game
>>
>>720667840
Why do people who almost certainly identify as anti-capitalist or socialist to some degree bootlick big corpo video game companies so much?
>>
>>720667840
>posting a shitty video from like 4 months ago
slow day, op?
although, I guess everyday must be pretty slow for a miserable faggot like you.
>>
>>720675685
Because their friends work the industry
>>
people who constantly fall for ragebait should not be legally allowed to use the internet
i'm serious btw
>>
>/v/ suddenly hates capitalism
Wtf where did all these commies come from?
>>
>>720667840
>Journalists defending Nintendo.
So... nothing new?
>>
>>720668271
They're mentally ill psychopaths and freaks. They should be institutionalized not allowed to run free
>>
File: 1551675581442.jpg (27 KB, 400x433)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
I wish we had done more to push back against digital games when the pricing was the same as physical, otherwise fuck any game more than $60
>>
>>720677146
It wouldn't have mattered. The hobby was taken over by NPC consumers who treat gaming like a time waster. The softball dad who fired up his PS once a year for the latest God of War, the soccer mom who screws around in switch here and then to check on her Animal Crossing island. Those people are the target of game companies now. Not the chuds who have 10s of thousands of hours logged in different games over the years. Since those NPCs only buy one of two games a year, they don't care how much they cost.
>>
>>720667840
polygon still exists?
>>
>>720667840
I’m never spending a single penny over $20 for the rest of my life on a video game. You fucking scum want to charge 4x the cost of Silksong for shitty games? Mario Kart World was worth dogshit, I’ve had way more fun with Silksong despite being 1/4th the price. Just such utter scum these people are, it’s unbelievable
>>
>>720674505
jerry my beloved seamonkey princess
>>
If your game costs more than 60€ I'm pirating
>>
If games have to be $80, then they should all be tradable and sellable, especially digital.
>>
>>720667840
I love how game journos say shit like that, like anyone wants their dumb fucking corporate cocksucking opinion.
>>
>>720669023
you had that in storage just for this day didn't you
>>
>>720667840
> Microsoft funded editorial supports big corportations.
Why are you shocked?
>>
>>720676773
What's this revisionism?
Journos love to shit on Nintendo every chance they get



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.