>"native" aka not enabling better-than-native DLSS4 just to reduce nvidia performanceAMDunboxed does it again!
>>720715225The pic is showing 4080 > 5080 though
>>7207151704090 chads stay winning
>>720715352So? We know amdunboxed gets results nobody else can reproduce because they fudge their numbers on purpose.
>>720715225>dude just use fake frames!
>>720715170>1080p [Badass] TSR Native>[Badass]
>>720715170>5080 doing worse than a 4080Press X to doubt the authenticity of this chart.
>>720715170>best consumer graphics card on the market currently can barely crack 100 FPS average>in fucking 1080pwhat the fuck is modern vidya man
>>720715590>dude, those frames are "fake"! Never mind that it doesn't matter because the end result is the same, they are "fake" therefore they are bad!!!!!!!!!!Why are people like this? What the fuck do I care if the frames are "fake" if it looks and feels like 120fps, but without it it would be 80 at best?
>>720715850>the end result is the same>feels like 120fpswhy are you shilling a product you never experienced?
>>720715826>its okay when crytek did it
>AMD unboxed
Isn't this shit cel shaded with like 7 polygons per character? How does UE5 do it again.
>you are just poorfa-
>>720715352Nvidia drivers strike again!
>>720715170>gimp all your cards but gimp your competitors harder>just in time for the new gpu release next year havent we seen this exact scenario play out like 10 over times by now
>4080 cant hold 60fps at 1080pLMAO
>>720716538buying a modern 80 card is asking to get scammedthis reminds me of the day i went to the computer store when rtx5080 launched and the few people who bought 5080s were kids using their parents' money
>>720715170>DUVAL MAGIC.jpg
>>720716601thank god i bought the last good 80 card (the 3080)
>>720716030I've had a 4090 for 2 years, please tell me about how I never experienced it. Projecting much? But actually that makes sense. The "fake frame" idiots are the ones who don't even own a 4000 series card so they never even tried frame generation, so how the hell would they know what the fuck they are talking about?Thanks for clearing that up.
>>720716509hang onto your underwear, we're only just starting
>>720716746framegen only costs 5bux for older cards tho
>>720716746interpolation is literally nothing new, maybe it is to you, but it has and always will be shit, thanks for pointing out that you are retarded nigger moron
>>720716509luv it
>>720716813amd pulled a uno reverse by making their first gaming focused uarch gpu for the first time in a whilenvidia's AI focused blacked well just cant compete with a real gaming gpu uarch
>>720716813>9070xt that close to a 4090>9070xt above a 4080 super>7900xtx on par with a 4080>7800xt basically matching a 3090Yeah this is a complete fabrication. Makes sense why advanced marketers proper up this channel.
>>720716826there is insanely noticeable input lag from lossless scaling. the upscaling isnt too bad though.
>>720716910>IT IS NOT REAL THIS CANNOT BE HAPPENING NJUDEA BROS
>>720716910>anon finally notices that 80 and 90 card series aren't that different
>>720716910the gaps between top NVIDIA and top AMD are a lot larger once they hit 4K with the Badass settings, that one seems a lot more feasible, but I really wouldn't put it past something with this game to be utterly fucked somehow, and 4K chokes everybody anyway. ONLY in the 1440p range AMD doesn't choke.
Why the fuck do people care about Borderlands?Series has 5 games, 2 spinoffs and a movie and all of them were bad and ass, just like Randy intended
>>720716994No other reviewer gets such results and doesn't happen in any other game. Hey ho though, made-up bullshit must be true because....ughh.....FUCK NVIDIA
>>720716054>I'm a dishonest niggerCrytek made the best looking photo realistic game by a long shot in 2007 which required extremely powerful hardware at the time.Meanwhile Bordershit looks like a late ps4 title at best yet runs like dogshit
>>720717079Anon, most people are using the Badass for testing. Medium seems to be some weird spot where AMD equals up to the ante, but you hit the near-max at the same resolution and NVIDIA starts inching it out at that level, and only barely. The margins for differences are actually so little that it's not that surprising.
>>720715170>4070 ti super>outperforms 5070 tiu wot
>>720717628You're only figuring out now that the entire 50 series lineup is complete shit apart from 5090?
The 5090 has to be the biggest joke in recent memory.>3090 vs 4090 = 40 fps difference>4090 vs 5090 = 10 fps differenceThe fuck happened
HAHAHAH NVIDIOTS
its been years now40xx and 50xx gpus were made on same process nodewhat exactly are you expecting to change?
>>720716746so you are just blind
>>7207185256090 will be better.
>>720718656>using the wrong dll on purposeBretty good bait, I'll give it a 6.9/13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfaN3emhChQ>heres the recced specs>the testings hows they're pretty much correctwhat more do gamers want?sure you can wait for perf patches but you can just deal with 60 fps gameplay and be done with it
>>720716813>3000 Dollar card is barely faster than a 650 dollar oneNot a good look, Jensen.
>njudea cards so gimped they're actually losing to the 9070xt on a sponsored gameA-at least I have NVENC!
>>720716746dude forget about it, it's just ayymdtrannies and jeets with 1050s who think that dlss 4 looks the same as dlss 1 lolI recently tried the new "smooth motion" thing and nvidia just proved again that they are the innovators and niggers gonna hate nvidias framegen even though they never tried it
>>720719802of course aqua jeet makes a post like this
>>720715225get out you fucking spook, we don't want ghosting
>>720718767cope
>>720717628they changed a part of the shader they havent touched since rtx3000 so they probably had to undo optimizations used in rtx4000
>>720719802poverty causes a lot of angst
>>720718767>wrong dllso there are bad dlss versions?
>>720720189they havent touched since rtx2000*
>>720719802keep shilling for njudea, aquajeethttps://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/720629838/#720630008
>>720720412>>720720075nigga who tf is this i just wanted to post aqua. i don't know any of your threadjeets
>>720719802i've had rtx4090 and rtx5090 and only had to use it when coping with bad frames in portal RTXits better than nothing i guess but i would have preferred having real frames without FG cope
>>720720510prove you are not him by saying nigger nigger nigger
>>720720510>damage controlcat's out of the bag, sanjeet
>>720720559nigger nigger nigger jeetsnvidia>amd
Bump
obvious shill is obvious
not even pretending
>>720717429Damn, if AMD didn't cuck out so much and released atleast 80CU gpu instead of 64... We would have 800$ gpu with almost RTX4090 raster.
>>720720615>this message has been watermarkedoh no no discordleakingsisterbros, how are we will stop these raids now??
>>720715170>1080p>only the $1000 and higher gpus even hit 60 fpsI love UE5
>>720716701this but 3080Ti
>>720723156>it's not UE5 faultt. Timmy tencent
>>720715826>literally has less visual features than previous games>literally has the same texture quality as previous games>models are exactly the same quality as previous games>gives you 1/4 the framerate as previous games
>>720722665>500w to compete with a 300w card AND lacks actual features like working opengl and dlssNobody would've bought it and people who say they would are liars as the last 10 years of market share proves.
>>720724862fsr4's better than dlss3 cnn model and only slightly worse than dlss4 transformer model>openglliterally what abandonware
>>720725397Don't forget the inability to do path tracing more than single digit fps!
>>720724862You say that RX9080XT 80CU at 300W could take RTX4090 at 500W? Strange take my dude.
