[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: header (3).jpg (61 KB, 460x215)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
Should I consoom AoE2 while it's on sale? I'm old but somehow I never played this during its heydey.
Is multiplayer fun for newfags or do you have to be a turbo-autist? Do I need the DLC or just the base game to start?
>>
Yeah it's worth having. I tried the multiplayer once and it almost crashed the game due to the spergs creating thousands of units constantly.
>>
>>722324848
Yes, play it. You can just play the base game and have fun, multi is fine but you'll probs wanna play against AI at the start just to see how you do.
>>
>>722324848
>Do I need DLC to start?
Base game has hundreds of hours of single player missions. For multiplayer, at the moment some of the Chinese dlc civs are very good. Definitely not necessary though and the meta is always in flux due to patches.
>>
File: 1667052423293193.jpg (147 KB, 1500x1200)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
>>722324848
much of the dlc that came out during HD edition and the early devinitive edition is now included for free in the base game so it has tons of content out of the box

>Is multiplayer fun for newfags or do you have to be a turbo-autist?
depends on your definition, since the multiplayer scene is still realy big you will easily find opponents on your skill level, however aoe 2 has a steep learning curve and before you can start playing against opponents you first need to learn things like openings and counters

fortunaly, the devs included an tutorial mode explicitly made to learn the basic meta for multiplayer 1v1 so it is not as intimidating as it sounds
you should still be prepared to get your but kicked when you start ranked, your starting elo is actualy quite high so you will undoubtly get matched against opponents that are way more experienced than you for your first games
>>
Should I get AoE4?
>>
>>722326927
Sure
AoE2 is hard carried by nostalgia
>>
>>722326994
I'm not good at RTS tho, the micromanaging makes me panic and sweat
>>
>>722324848
There is tons of campaigns right now so you don't even need to play MP
>>
>>722326927
sure why not, its litteraly just aoe2 but modern without its weird quinks
>>
File: 482057205729.jpg (421 KB, 1073x1777)
421 KB
421 KB JPG
>>722324848
I play it for campaigns atm. Fun so far, steam achievements make it interesting. They are way better than what HD edition had (see pic)
>>
File: 1450382867257.png (245 KB, 562x258)
245 KB
245 KB PNG
>>722324848
get 3 and make sure you get the moortugal/spaniarabia dlc
>>
File: 1667060756098462.jpg (1.6 MB, 2030x1450)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB JPG
>>722327140
no, play MP, plz I need fellow noobs to play with ;(
>>
They're gonna hate me for this but:
AoE4 is better. You actually get to use your UU and games are far shorter than the same 15 min slog beginning that AoE2 has.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.