[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mario-galaxy.jpg (312 KB, 1920x1080)
312 KB
312 KB JPG
The Wii version simply looks better.
>>
they should've just made a remaster instead. then they would've had an actual good reason to sell it for $70.
>>
>>722327046
objectively false
>>
>>722327046
>switch 2 banding
Oh Nononono lmfao
>>
Oh yes, I'm a true contrarian shiteater, so if I see jagged pixelated edges, I see SOVL, and it's automatically better, yes.
>>
>>722327046
Aliasing = Alien = Space = Better
>>
No old game is worth $70, fuck off
>>
>>722327567
That happens when you capture hdr footage with non hdr equipment and you view it on non hdr display, anon
>>
>>722327645
What about 40 dollars? Is an old game worth 40 dollars? If so, I have great news for you. You can get each remaster for 40, or both of them together as a bundle for 35 each.
>>
>>722328280
>game was sold for $20 on the wii and wii u
$20 sounds fair, $40 sounds like a joke.
>>
>>722329101
yeah but everyone had a wii and it was still $20 there with the nintendo selects.
>>
>>722327046
is that chromatic aberration on the left one a part of the game or just the tv screen?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.