[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ico.900x.jpg (60 KB, 900x567)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
which cover would more likely convince you to buy this game?
>>
>>722506396
left makes it look like a side view platformer which is underselling ico.
>>
>>722506396
Considering I bought Ico on PS2, it didn't matter what the cover was.
>>
>>722506396
Neither
Left looks like pretentious trash (which it is) the right one looks stupid
>>
>>722506396
right looks like a video game, left looks like a shitty european painting that tells you nothing
>>
>>722506396
Left is better artisitcally, but right tells you a basic information about the game.
>>
>>722506762
right looks like a videogame because you're used to videogames with shitty covers
>>
American localizers be like: Yo, we improved it!
>>
>>722506396
Left
>>
>>722506396
>I seriously hope you guys don't play this
>>
any game covers where the graphics came directly from game play?
>>
File: wto.jpg (1.9 MB, 3025x2022)
1.9 MB
1.9 MB JPG
>>722506592



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.