>play re2make for 30 minutes>get the urge to play original insteadI don't even have nostgia for the original. Re2make was my intro to the series and I've only beaten it 3 times. I used to love it.
The atmosphere and soundtrack and voice work is all much better in the original. https://youtu.be/QQw5Sep9e24https://youtu.be/pmq7TazJLrs
>>722513643My intro to the series was RE1make and it's still my favorite. The crimson head mechanic, resource management and map design are all top notch.
>>722513643i have no idea how anyone in their right mind has any will to replay this after playing RE3. absolutely everything about it is so boring. i like the PS1 aesthetic but that's it.
>>722514728>you can only like 1 gameLet me guess: Fromdrone?
played for the first time this weekend. just finished the Leon run. I liked it but felt too short.
>>722515079they are the same concept with one being gameplaytechnically more enhanced. it's really not hard to understand why one trivializes the other.
>>722513643ok
>>722514728RE3 killed the series once and almost did it twice
>>722515502RE3 (1999) was the best in the original trilogy though.
>>722515680what kind revisionism is this. RE3 was so completely mogged by Silent Hill in '99 that RE got shelved and we got 3 silent hill games between RE3 and RE4. but you had to be conscious back then to remember this.
>>722515378So that's a>YESto my question?
>>722515502it was nowhere near dying on both instances. nobody gives a fuck about your>muh horror atmosphereincluding the very guy who made RE2 given that DMC was originally a Resident Evil game>>722516130in this instance.... i guess yea. it's a yes
>>722513643Not surprising.The RE-Engine DEmakes are fucking awful, and a wet slaps in the faces of every RE-fan that waited upwards to 2 decades for RE2 and 3 to get THE REmake "1" treatment.>>722514306REm1 is amazing, and the game that started the whole remake fever, but you really lose a lot of its appeal and "whoa!" effect if you skip the 1996 original RE.
