>5th highest metacritic user score nintendo game, behind majora's mask, ocarina, metroid prime and mario 64are we living through another nintendo platinum age?
Moar like rhodium age
>>722523952Zoomers just have recency bias. You see the same thing in places like Backloggd.
wat.even discount third parties that math isn't adding up
OH BANANA
>>722523952mogged
>>722523952Has it sold well?
>the hints how fake it all is are getting the most obivous
>>722525125It's sad that even Sony's soulless nostalgia-fest is a better platformer then Nintendo's latest.How the mighty have fallen.
>>722523952It's a truly splendid game. But more than that it is a genuinely unique game experience since there really isn't another game that plays anything like it. At best you can make superficial, structural comparisons to Odyssey. But in practise they play very differently from one another, and even in terms of structure they're actually very different too since Bananza chose to approach progression and gating differently from Odyssey to a significant degree. Game goodGame unique Game memorableGame satisfyingGame fun
>>722523952>>722525125As someone who loves astro bot and is looking forward to getting bananza, these two games don’t seem all that comparable
>>722525664>these two games don’t seem all that comparable3d platformers where you fight enemies and jump over holes in the ground
>>722526083My god, you’re right
>>722523952How would a sequel work?
How is dk64 compared to this
Cum inside poppy kong
>>722527231more bananas?
But the Switch 2 has no games!>underage faggots who refuse to try Bananza because DK has went four console generations without a 3D title and it's not their bing bing wahoo they grew up with
>>722523952All you do is punch things, it's boring
>>722528937this, so much this
>>722528713I mean in terms of story and setting
>>722523952imagine actually believing this bing bing banana game can even be spoken in the same sentence as those games. are you nintendoids even human?
>>722531737Anon, all of those are nintendo games
>>722525449What?
Bump
>>722523952Yeah. Easy goty
>>722524107What’s wrong with rhodium?
>>722523952It's a solid 8/10 game>91 metascoreRemove the nintendo bonus and the black protagonist bonus and we're there
>>722528649Anyone got anymore poppy long?
Bananza is a great game, but user scores do not matter and never have. They are not an indicator of anything.
As someone who loved Mario Odyssey and played it to 100% three times, Bananza was a huge letdown. 90% of my memories of this game are just seeing a banana on sonar and smashing walls until I got it. I didn't 100% it and have absolutely no urge to play it again. It's like playing TotK but the hoverbike that trivialized everything is built into Link's basic moveset.
>>722523952As that autistic anon pointed out (he even made a YouTube video afterwards), the gaming press began to become less demanding around the 2000s.You can't compare modern reviews with older ones, simply because the old press was more rigorous. In fact, the press was more rigorous than the public back then, but today the trend has reversed, and the public tends to be more critical of games than the specialized press, which is a phenomenon unique to video games.
>>722537826The system is broken, any time a game with a huge about of hype behind it gets an honest critical review, fanboys send twitter armies to complain and try to get the reviewer fired. If game review outlets want to stay in business they have to reaffirm fanboy beliefs.Not to mention games are so massive and padded now, most reviews are written in the honeymoon phase where the game is still throwing new things at you, with no regard to how well the game systems actually stand up over 50 hours of playtime.
>>722537826Seems like the opposite to me
>>722528947>t. Never played it
More like banadium age
