[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: QC_boxart.jpg (758 KB, 1200x1476)
758 KB
758 KB JPG
ZoomerGOD here, Is this game worth getting into in 2025 if I want to play movement based multiplayer shooters?

Also any other classical movement based shooters worth playing?
>>
>>722556535
Your only real options are Quake Live and Quake Champions. Both have small but dedicated playerbases and are excellent games.
>>
>>722556535
No, it's been dead for a while - just like all of the other classical movement shooters. The only thing that gives me a similar amount of enjoyment these days is TF2, but it's not the same.
>>
bump
>>
>>722556535
Like this anon said >>722556727 The game has a small but dedicated player base(I mean small like only 400 players tops) but the game does get small updates. I find the game pretty good and my brother and I still play the game from time to time.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.