With the insane amount of advanced AI being implemented into this game, what type of wacky situations are you expecting to happen with NPCs?
I heard they're using ai to make a large amount of the buildings in the game accessible so interiors will be unique and randomly generated thus adding to the immersion
put me in the game///. Hopefully every stolen car takes away shark cards.
Calling it:>Rockstar will not release sales for as much time as possible>When forced to release them, they will push on the hyper success narrative and how "top of the charts" they are>Will claim the game to be played by billions of players despite being a console exclusive and total sales of consoles worldwide being extremely limited (you don't expect scalpers to buy a copy of the game for each console, do you?)>They will do everything in their power to hide the real budget of the game, the budget of marketing and the publisher cut>They will do absolutely everything to avoid publishing the target sales numbers after the Veilguard incident>They will try to damage control with "heh, we're making money from kids buying shark cards for online mode anyway", which will be raped and shattered by age verification >Will keep spamming about hyper success of gta6 and deflect any questions about meeting target sales or breaking even
$250 for Grand Theft Auto 6 is cheap.
>>722562707Rockstar is the Apple of gaming. They win by sticking to tried and true formulas. If they try to innovate, it'll go down as well as the Vision Pro.
>>722563263Dude why are you pretending like this wont be making billions. The last trailer alone got like 100 million views in the span of a few days. To create this narrative that R* will hide sales numbers for what exactly? Because you unironically think it will underperform based on literally nothing? I'm not even saying this as a fanboy but you have to be objectively retarded to think this game doesn't have potential to become the most successful game of all time. Even if the game ends up being complete dogshit which it more thank likely wont be, it would still be a massive success regardless because most gamers are completely hooked and ready to buy it. Other than shitpost, I can't even imagine how you could possible come up with the drivel you just typed out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HulO5oR4SaUI'm making a free GTA style crime sandbox and one thing I need opinions on is how deep I should go with "GTA6ing" or "RDR2ing" the game. I could add a lot of depth with features like car fuel, engine overheat, vehicle trunk inventory you need to use (like storing weapons on horse in RDR2, will likely be in GTA6 based on leaks), police pulling you over for speeding, etc but I feel like everything I mentioned here subtracts from the arcade feel of the game and is a bit of a waste of time for the player having to manage all that shit. For a 2D sandbox like this, what would you rather see?https://progchad.itch.io/pixurbiahttps://gx.games/games/r5r8eb/pixurbia/
>grand theft slop yawn
>>722564095Most of those views came from people never bought a game in their lives. Even if all of those 100 million views translate into sales, they would barely be breaking even. They need to have a multi-billion dollar surplus to make their next game or they would have to go into debt. That can only happen if they can exceed GTA V's financial success. When you realize that GTA's strongest player base is in Africa, that isn't happening.
Grand Theft Auto Vi $440
>>722564383Holy fuck anon you live in a bubble go out and touch grass
>>722564519I'm not saying a lot of people won't play GTA. They would need everyone playing GTA to break even. They're too big to succeed.
>>722562707>NIGGER: the gameno thank you
>>722562707Shoot every woman that actively cucks their husband. Bros before these Florida hoes.
>>722564619>activelyLmao go massage Jada's feet, Will.
>>722563263oh fer sure GTA is going to fail because there's a bunch of ghetto black people in it. this is completely off brand for GTA
>>722564383You're just making shit up
I think I've become one of those guys that says GTA games are too dumb for him
>>722564140The top down approach is great. GTA6 would be great to play like GTA2.
>>722564936>The top down approach is great. GTA6 would be great to play like GTA2.It's 5AM and this level of low effort baiting is so utterly dumb and boring. This is the level of engagement you people come up with at these hours?
>>722564383Even IF GTA6 cost literally $1 billion dollars, it would make it all back in the first year.
GTA 6 will fail because of the minority playable character and criminal activity glorification. No other GTA before this has had african americans and gang activity. They should stick to their roots of a completely serious life sim set in Argatha.
>>722565301You're literally replying to a random anon that replied to my post. Go be a cranky schizo cocksucker somewhere else
>>722565301Stupid zoomers are too young to remember complaints about Rockstar removing the topdown camera option
>>722564936Thanks dude, it started with just being curious about a game like this is pure 2D and ended with me wanting to make a fully fleshed out sandbox city. I'll be adding entire other cities and shit in the future. Debating making the game take place in the 90's or early 2000's.
>>722565417Except it cost 3 times that back in 2022.
>>722565768>because I said so
>>722565856Did you forget the leaks? They need to sell 100 million copies to break even. They need to exceed GTA V's figures to avoid going into debt. They need to do that in half the time GTA V got. Otherwise, it's either the end of Rockstar, or getting acquihired by Saudi Arabia's EA.
>>722566167You're still shitposting
$600 for Grand Theft Auto VI.
>>722562707I expect it to basically have the positive/negative interaction buttons like RDR2 but with a much larger variety of dialogue due to the more varied population>>722563160this is an underage tier rumor. The actual new tech we know they are using is dynamic pathfinding for NPCs that lets them cross bodies of water using multiple vehicles. So we might get more dynamic missions through that
>>722563263You desperately hoping GTA VI will fail is worse than the guys who hoped BG3 would fail. You are not the Shazamposter. You will never be Him.
>>722562707There will be a zoomer mode where the game dialogue will change to skibidi toilet and the player character will have a panic attack if they havent used their phone or stay outside for a long time.
>>722562707I wonder if they will have a weapon limitation like red dead and you'll keep the arsenal in your trunk or something. or if there will be a backpack item that allows you to carry more. no matter what, R* lost their lead physics programmer to Valve a few years ago and I'm scared the euphoria and car deformation will be even more downgraded than 5
>>722566491>this is an underage tier rumor.This sentence is so remarkably stupid that the person who typed it as a legitimate response must be underage. Like what the fuck is an underage tier rumor. You just made that up as a weak insult to discredit something you know nothing about
>>722566885it's the kind of rumor that the 12 year olds on gtaforums talk about. completely baseless
>>722566818>I'm scared the euphoria and car deformation will be even more downgraded than 5we both know that's not true though. That's just dumb doomposting
>>722566948that's what I thought before 5 released
>>722565496Did u even play vcs or SA u moron
>>722566946why do you browse GTA forums like an underage person would do in order to know this is the shit they discuss? That's suspicious
>>722567070He's trolling you, faggot. The fact you responded and no one else did just shows how blatantly obvious the bait was and yet you somehow still didn't know it. You're a fucking retard.
>>722567001yeah but it came out on PS3. They had to cut some stuff. You were originally able to climb almost everything (street lamps, rain gutters, tubes) but it got scrapped.Same with Skyrim. That game also had to downgrade some stuff like AI to make the game work
