[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3459.jpg (8 KB, 160x160)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
fps is just diminishing returns once you go past 48
>>
you can just say that you are poor.
>>
I just don't believe you. 60 is a choppy mess after using 120 for a period of time.
>>
>>722605997
Correct. I don't think I've ever known of a48yo who was good at FPS.
>>
>>722605997
120fps actually, I can't tell anything apart from 120fps+ on my 180Hz monitor.
48fps is just the bare minimum for smoothness, 60fps is the minimum acceptable if you have any standards. For competitive shooters, 120fps is the minimum.
>>
File: 1714077910590.webm (2.22 MB, 1920x1080)
2.22 MB
2.22 MB WEBM
>>722605997
I stop seeing much difference after 100. Around 40 is when it starts looking choppy.
>>
>>722605997
what the fuck are you talking about retard, it's already been proven that the human eye cannot see past 24 fps



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.