It was a good idea but poorly executed, clearly. But how would /v/ fix this game?
>>722614405Bump
>>722614405removing the rng and turning it into a more detective ish game where questioning the NPCs would actually help you learn if they're visitors or not.
>>722614405Interested in picking this up, anything in particular that makes it poorly executed?
>>722614405Don't know anything about this game but it looks like an immigration allegory
>>722614779Play it before finding out. Your ignorance will make the experience better.
>>722615001Well the analogy is pretty apt, you have a bunch of people that are trying to get into your home who have a much higher chance of killing you than random normal people. Now was I talking about the game or mass immigration?
It was executed well enough for the budget it had.
>>722614779Play it first like the other guy said. I thought it was a good game for a first playthrough but disappointing if you want to get more endings and delve deeper into the world. But the experience gets deflated the moment you know about how the mechanics interact like all horror games