>toby fox>is a furrythe joke writes itself
>toby fox>not toby dog???
I'll never play the game, but i will fap to this foxy lady
>>722662805Based human man.
>>722662805spbp
>>722662334>not kyskys
>>722663042What is the context for this image? That she killed children in the past and is now a nanny? Or that those are the children in the photo
>>722663214the former, you can tell by the fact that it is in black and white and is in a photo print out during the time the kids are alive... kek
>>722663214No nazis can get away with war crime, retribution is coming.
>>722663357yes, the far left (the good guys) put a pipebomb rod up the little girls cunny, and are about to detonate it now shes hugging the mark.This will kill both the little girl and the little boy, as well as the kids in the back, of course, but dont worry its for the greater good! a le hecking nazirino is going down and that makes it morally justafiable and okay! (source: ourselves)We are the GOOD guys, guys!
>>722663214I don't think those are necessarily children hanging on the background of the photo but the idea is that she was a war criminal who has been tracked down and is now living a wholesome life, at once trying to hide from judgment for her crimes but also atone for them in her lwn way. Maybe the POV is of someone wronged by her seeking her for revenge, or an investigator trying to bring her to justice. The image implicitly asks us if it is more moral to value the happiness of those children who currently owe their happy lives to her over getting justice for those she hurt and killed before. Do you kill or arrest her and ruined their lives? Or do you walk away and allow her to get away with all she did? Does the good she does now make up for the evil she once did? You can also see that she is unhappy, seemingly void of emotion in the picture, whereas she is happy now. Clearly, she didn't do those evil acts because she enjoyed it, but because the system she was a part of mandated it. Does she have the right to redeem herself on her own terms? Is she a victim herself? Perhaps not as much as those she killed, but nevertheless her current circumstances suggest that she isn't inherently evil, but was caught up in the flow of evil around her. The fact that she is an attractive woman adds to the ambiguous and conflicting feelings, as humans tend to want to forgive the transgressions of attractive people. But the scar on her face, even more than an identifying feature, is a physical manifestation of how the actions of her past have marred her purity and beauty. It's a visible representation of her sin, but also the fact that she too was wounded, perhaps by the very forces that drove her to do evil.
>>722663897sorry but the only two conclusions you are allowed to reach from this image are either that she's based and redpilled or that she's a heckin' nazino room for nuance
>>722662805/thread
>>722662991Human men aren't real.
