WHEEEEEEZE
>>722840863this is fake
im trans
This is real
Go wokeGo broke
>game is shit and a chore to play>still 5/10Is it even possible to get below a 5?
>>722840863who the fuck plays battlefield for the singleplayer
WILL YOU BITETHE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU
>>722840964Heterosexual male here. Wassup?
>>722841035CoD won
>>722840863Who the fuck plays BF for singleplayer lol.
>>722840863why does an multiplayer-focused need a good mission design and engaging plot? I bet they rated Fortnite much higher without any of those.
>>722841132They needed to hit that 70$ price tag
>>722841004>IGNWith AAA/high budget games, 7 is their default. You'd have to try hard to get lower than that. Non-AAA/high budget games start at a much lower score.
>campaign is trash>BFWow, what a surprise. Still for an MP focused series I always thought it should've had co-op story mode
she won
>>722840863>5/10still above half the other games according to this rating... right?
>>722841267That's a man.
Goddamn it I was hoping for a good FPS game this year
Yeah angel does it again !
>Single Player ReviewI have never even stopped to think about the campaign in any Battlefield I have enjoyed
>>722840863No one plays BF for its single player though realistically
>>722841004It's technically proficient and still plays like a game.Current quality control and marketing makes it really hard to come across a genuine dogshit game.
battlefield has a campaign?
>>722841267>>722841585I'm not aggressively against people who want to identify as this, that, or the other. But if someone wants me to take their altered pronouns seriously, they best at least make an effort to sound and look like a girl. I put more effort into cleaning my room than some put effort into sounding like a girl.
>>722841004It's a review of the singleplayer campaign. The campaign does indeed look like shit, and we know for a fact that it was rushed, but nobody cares about the campaign in a BF game.
>>722841089>CoD wonBy doing nothing. Amazing.
Bad faith indians are trying to claim this is for the whole game and not just single player campaign review. The battlefield single player campaign has always been shit, this is nothing new
>>722841110its always gen x gamer dads
I'm surprised they're still doing singleplayer campaigns for these games, what portion of the playerbase even does them?
>>722842904I'm surprised they even bother with an SP campaign anymore
>>722842829>Serve up dogshit>Literally tell your audience to not buy your game if unhappy with dogshit>Fall out of relevance
>>7228408635/10 is an accurate score for a BF game with no server browser.
>>722842904Battlefield 3 was quite well executed (I can't even remember BF4 it was so generic) but the fact still remains that although the characters are quite pleasant, the story is about as deep as one of those dumb TV cop shows.
>>722842904>Shit out half good half bad product instead of one that perfects both campaign and multiplayerThis is why gaming is dying
>>722842904they should either make good campaigns or stop making campaigns
>implying ea dont have them in the payroll
>>722842829They're removing SBMM and disbanding lobbies
Niggas was complaining about no campaign, not because people who play BF want campaign, but because they just say so. 99% of potential players will never launch it but they still want the company to waste money on voice acting, cutscenes, maps just to have more things to scroll through in the main menu... Retarded. So fucking retarded. Kill gamers.
>>722842718Since Bad Company, yes. I think the Xboxhuge game had one too
>>722843064BF3 had a couple of memorable set pieces but for the most part it wasn't that good.
>>722840863Battlefield campaigns have always had great characters and great setpieces but mediocre stories. Doubly so for Bad Company.
I unironically played the campaign of these games because most of them costed me less than one USD.
>they cancelled Dead Space future remakes just for this mediocre shit
>>722843438Holy shit lol. CoD won. BF trannies on suicide watch
>>722843681Yeah, I agree. But there have definitely been games with stories that had potential but then fucked up on the execution, and in those it's difficult to have fun with the game IMO
>>722840863>shitty campaignBattlefield is back
>>722843438Now they just have to remake the game without the decade of console limitations holding it back and then I'd give it a try.
>>722843580which reminds me that bad company games are literally the only worth while bf campaigns, bc should have been the standard
>>722840863I wouldn't put it past these types to rate the game lower after the saudi buy out
>>722842783>we know for a fact that it was rushedHow do we know this? If anything they had extra time to make the campaign since it's been 4 years since the last BF and they didn't have a campaign in that so it flopped.
>>722843785>demake
>>722843438based for persistent lobbies
Will 6 be the first decent BF game since BF1?
>>722844018Add co-op and I'll agree with you
>>722841004If your check bounces
>>722840863I don’t think BF has ever had a better campaign than COD
>>722841004That's about what a 5/10 should be dumb nigger.>0/10: Game doesn't even start. Nobody can play it >1-3/10: Game is a buggy mess that is barely playable and not fun even if the bugs get fixed. You won't like it even if you're a fan of the genre >4-6/10 Game works mostly fine but it offers nothing new or interesting. You might like it if you're a fan of the genre>7-9/10: Game is fun and works fine. You will like it unless you absolutely hate the genre>10/10: Game is kino, there are minor flaws but only niggers sperg out about them. You will like the game unless you're a contrarian nigger.
>>722842404I didn't even know they were adding a singleplayer campaign. Who plays Battlefield for that?
Did they say anything about giving engineers a gadget or two that was more useful on non-vehicle maps? The rocket launcher is a decent anti-infantry weapon at least.
>>722841267that's a male
>>722844734Back around BF3/4 they advertised the campaigns as being these incredible action sequences due to the destructible buildings but the campaigns usually just end up being tech demos for multiplayer and you don’t really pay much attention to the story
>>722843438it's afraid
>>722840863So it is actually a return to form, since bf singleplayer has always been awful.
>>722842904>The battlefield single player campaign has always been shit
>>722840863>>722841110>>722841132>>722841240I liked Battlefield 1's campaign, especially the Australia levels, but I stopped playing after reaching the Middle East levels, couldn't stand the shitty stealth mechanics.
>>722841035>YOU WILL BUY>THE SLOP>THAT HATES YOU
>>722840863>Mission design and plotWho the fuck play BF for the campaign? The games were best when it didn't even have one
>>722843775>PS3>PS4 >first person game on controller my condolences
>>722845121bf1 prologue still gives me chills to this dayalso the ost in that game has to be the best out of all battlefields
>>722841240The only Battlefield campaign that's tolerable is Bad Company, and that's only because of the funny characters. I don't know what DICE is thinking. The BF games have always been about the multiplayer. They should just stop wasting their time with singleplayer(maybe just offline bots, but that's it).
>>722845646People complained about 2042 not having one (along with many, many other things). But my guess is just that they really, really want to compete with COD so they rushed a campaign for people who want to try it over BO7. But maybe you can argue a bad campaign is worse than not having one if you’re going for good first impressions
>>722840863>engaging plot in a rooty tooty point and shooty
>>722840863Obviously the campaign is dogshit. They've never made a good campaign except for the first bad company because it was irreverent and didn't care.But the beta was shite and I'm existentially insulted that I was 100% right about open weaponst. It was going to suck. It did suck and "carbines" as a universal class made sure of it.I actually schizoposted that EA was doing something underhanded with open weapons mode being the default with a bunch of options and then basically hiding the closed weapon mode. They actually had the fucking audacity to try and pretend that was people voting for open vs closed weapons. EA did all of that BS just so they could sell more gun cosmetics.Gay nigger company fuck this franchise it's dead.
>>722845750>But maybe you can argue a bad campaign is worse than not having one if you’re going for good first impressionspeople were shitting on titanfall for being a full priced game with no campaign either so no, a bad campaign is not worse than no campaign for first impressions
>>722845894It was also an xbone exclusive which is a setback either way
>>722845993black ops 4 also got shit for having no campaign
>>722845993Technically, it was a timed exclusive since the Xbox 360 version came out ~1 month later
>>722840863https://youtu.be/OwPPXENc3AI?si=0Qr5KdA7CDpqkDhB
Titanfall died for this...
>>722845894Yeah people are dumb like that.A campaign really isn't a selling point for a titanfall game. A d I say that as someone who thinks that the campaign in titanfall 2 was lovely.
>>722846445Titanfall died for Apex and Respawn retardation.
>>722846482yeah no i don't disagree, I'm not playing online fps for some singleplayer shit I play to play against real people so campaigns existing means nothing but set dressing for the multiplayer (or it used to thanks fortnite)
>>722840863So if I buy this game (And that's a big fucking if.) Will I be able to mod out the woman "soldiers"? Not even trying to shitpost or bait I genuinely want to know. I really don't want to hear shrill screeching in my ears about needing ammo or a medic every 5 seconds. I won't even go into the female soldier retardation though that's also part of wanting to remove them of course.
>>722843785>cancelledit couldnt even get greenlit by EA to earn that title lmao
>>722840863did they ever review the campaign separetely? This seems like they took Activision money to jeopardize Battlefield but the MP already got overwhelmingly positive reaction so they couldnt just call the whole game bad
>>722843785they messed up the remake so it's probably for the best
>>722841110>Who the fuck plays BF for singleplayer lol.old fucks (like me) but that's why they review it seperateHonestly i'd respect it more if they dropped the campaign entirely. I don't remember BF2142 having one.
>>722840863single player. who cares?
>>722841004Only if games has pro-white stuff in it.
>>722848250>I don't remember BF2142 having one.It doesn't have one, just like 1942, Vietnam and 2 didn't have one. And no those weren't campaigns it was just skirmish vs bots on all maps.Battlefield isn't a series that needs campaigns.
>>722843438That doesn't fix the god awful maps
>>722844734Battlefield has better multiplayer and CoD has better campaigns, but I won't buy either without a campaign mode. I skipped 2042 because they lacked it.
>>722850023the bo7 maps are good though
>>722842749See that's the thing, they do it because they have to put little effort. Just say you're a girl (notice how they almost always say girl and not woman), claim you've been on HRT for a month and you're good to go.
>>722849147normalfags need campaignsthat's why team fortress 2 never managed to appeal to normalfags
>>722842904i honestly dont know why they even bothered with it
>>722840863If you’re playing the game for single player after all this time and worried about if it’s good or not, you’re retarded and should have your money stolen by Activision too.
>>722850610
>>722850771valorant league of legends overwatch marvel rivals
>>722851464>gachafagyeah no wonder you're retarded
>>722842783Campaign modes used to be the central focus on BF and CoD games.
>>722851563I play 1 single gacha game, you say BO7 has good maps. We are both dumb but you are much more than I.
>>722851546doesn't count
>>7228516911 single gacha game makes you a bigger retard than I (person who doesn't play gachaslop)
>>722851768How many call of duty games have you played and what platform did you play them on
>>722845121>>722845476>that song when he finally shot the flareabsolute ludo
BF fanboys are such fucking retards they think getting a shit campaign is normal. if it was in dev for 4 years they had time to make a good campaign. bf3 and bf4 were ass too but at least they had impressive graphics and sequences.
>722852828an actual human being wasted oxygen and calories attempting to use their brain to write a competent reply and somehow landed on this, dear lord what is the world coming to
Get better bait
>>722846546apex is better tho
>>722853225If that were true it wouldn't be dead for years now. Try again
>>722853330titanfall or apex?
>>722853225Lol lmao even
>>722853438>t. ADHD zoomer
>>722841004Anything under 7 is the same as a 0
Who cares?Campaigns always been trashMP is where its at and its looking goodAlso low settings still look really good
>>722840863>single player reviewliterally no one cares about Battlefield singleplayer when it's not Bad Company
>>722853598117th post best post
>>722852828We're used to BF campaigns falling anywhere between nonexistent to shitIf they didn't tie some dumb unlockable cosmetics to campaign I wouldn't even bother to install it
>>722853660Cheers, see you on the battlefield
>>722840863>form = returned tobattlechads we are so fvcking back
>>722853408Gaypex
>>722844691>>10/10: Game is kino, there are minor flaws but only niggers sperg out about them. You will like the game unless you're a contrarian nigger.IGN gave MGS V a 10/10 score. The game is unfinished and retarded and no one sane can claim otherwise.
>>722840964Average BF6 shill right here
>>722845023>multiplayer levels with standing still ai opponents.no
>>722852828nobody wants a campaign in battlefieldit's like playing mario party and wondering why you're not getting a full blown mario single player game with itit's retarded
>>722853834>Gaypex
>>722853857Mgsv deserves a 10/10
>>722851567BF didn’t even have a campaign until Bad Company
>>722840863>>722842904>all the maps in the beta were dogshit>instead of putting effort into making those maps good they just focused on a shitty single player campaign for the CODfags instead
>>722840863Battlefield lostCall of Duty won
>>722855047The campaign and the multiplayer were developed by separate studios
>>722855129they still could've brought the campaign studio in to work on multiplayer stuff insteadsuch a waste of resources when no one actually cares about the campaign of these games except CODfags who'll ditch it after a month
>>722851567Not for battlefield. BF campaigns are basically tech demosCOD is the opposite where they make campaigns and then multiplayer maps are recycled from campaign missions
>>722844085Original studio was behind schedule and EA closed it. Criterion had to rush to get it into a half decent state in order to meet the launch date.They should have just scrapped it entirely.
>>722855583BF campaigns have always been made inverse to how cod campaigns are. The mp maps are made first, then they asset flip a campaign out of them.
The voices in my head said this game is a flop and all of you are illuminati shills AIEEEEEEEEEE the player numbers are 5g manipulated usaid bots from india AIEEEEEEE JEWS JEWS JEWS
>>722853857mgsv IS a 10/10 though
I still don't get what the fuck the conflict is supposed to be. It's NATO and some random mercenary group? I understand trying to avoid current political topics so cutting out China and Russia was just them avoiding a shitstorm. Though that's still fucking retarded But is that really the best they could do? Why not just go down some massive civil war route or something and have splinter factions in the USA/Europe or whatever so you could have paramilitary/militia groups vs NATO or something. Then there could be more character in each map with various factions rather than just "Vague merc group somehow fighting a global war vs NATO."
>>722856862Tbh all i know is pax drip mogs nato hard
>>722847390It's a policy they only use for BF and CoD. For CoD it lets them boost the aggregate score because they always slobber over the campaign to make up for any negatives in the multiplayer. For BF they use it to drag down the aggregate before release, as for BF they only release the campaign review before launch, then the MP review comes later (to drag down scores and harm sales). IGN is the biggest CoD shill publication around.
>>722856862>have splinter factions in the USA/EuropeAfaik it's something like that. After Paris got nuked in BF3 NATO fractured with Spain, France and some others forming Pax Armata.Also sounds like Pax Armata is both some form of PMC while also being a military coalition akin to NATO.Shit is weird desu.
they should just make the campaign with open design and quick swap. Let us play as an army.Hell, even go a bit beyond that, give us squad commands (not shitty attack orders, go look at Brothers in Arms or Rainbow Six Vegas) or even an actual bigger scope. Fuck setpieces and strong narrative, just some light context and gameplay that you cant have in multiplayer.
>>722857601ngl I didn't even realize Battlefield had some sort of connected story. I figured each game was it's own separate contained thing. Though I only ever played the multiplayer except for Battlefield 4 when I did do the campaign. So I guess it kinda works. Though it is still weird as fuck.The real question I want to know now is if they are going to bring back Siege of Shangai and Paracel Storm. I loved those maps.
>>722841015As much as I understand the statement, I crave for some more Bad Company.
>>722841110I play it specifically to fine tune my controls. Only bf campaign I played more than once was bf3 and that's only because we had no internet for a while.
>>722855856How the hell were they behind schedule when they had 6 years to write it??
>>722858653BF3 and 4 are the same universe, I assume all the other games besides Bad Company are too.
>>722852828did you fucking read the op image?literally says that it has cool sequences but the plot is asskys retard
the first battlefront 2 had an ok campaign for what it waswith this game they tried to do a CoD campaign but without the CoD talent or budget, which is stupid
>game is easy to run even on a toaster>/v/ is so poor they still can't run it and have to cope by making up low reviews and OH NO NO NOposting over MUH NUMBERS
>>722855856>ai overview>even remotely accurate
>>7228457502042, they created everything for a campaign but the campaign itself. It'll come out at some point they had a campaign at some point and scrapped it, and the leftovers are what became the codex.
If you retards don't care about the single player why the fuck are you paying $70 for an online only game. The single player is there to inflate the price
>>722840863I'm not even installing the campaign, who cares. We played the multiplayer already and we know it's good.
>>722863084if they sold the game without the shitty campaign for a lower price I'd just buy that
Remove open weapons and I'll play the game.
>>722858441Battlefield 2 modern combat campaign and bonus levels are actually fun.
