>amazing game gets overlooked because of a cringe cover
>amazing game
amazing how they made a sequel 8 years with the exact same problems as the original
rage was okay(when played with hardware that can run it) but not good enough to make a sequel appealing, regardless of cover art
>Exit tutorial area>Head to first objective>Immediately encounter game breaking bug preventing progress>UninstallMind you, that was a month ago
The DLC ending was pure kino, I'll give it that.
>>722996759The writing was shit but it's not bad gameplay wise. Played far worse shooters that got better sales and scores
>>722996759The writing is absolute dogshit, the artstyle horrendous, the map uninteresting.The gameplay starts generic but the powers and upgrades are cool. However, by the time you finally have enough gear to have fun the game abruptly ends.You get to shoot hundreds of twats that look like the dyke on the cover, so that's a plus
>>722996759it's1.boring2.lost its original art style and design
>>722996759>implied to be a fast paced shooter>instead it's a slow open world pixel hunt for hidden treasure chestsFucking lame
>>722998758No?
>>722998758It is a fast paced shooter
>>722996961Which mod for new vegas: lonesome road is that??
>>722996759This game was so fucking boring, it's incredible that they actually managed to make RAGE 1 look goodHalf the guns are shit with worthless upgrades, the other half are far TOO strong and trivialise the gamethe abilities are the most generic "bioshock plasmid" copies I've ever seen in my life, completely devoid of originality, and they don;t even look impressiveEVERY. SINGLE. CUTSCENE. is "look at men being stupid, time for a strong smart independant woman to talk sense!" and it got so fuckign tiringThey abandoned any characters from the previous game and shit on their legacy insteadI bought this piece of shit on sale for 90% off during a time when I was really bored because of cunts like you who hyped it up, and I STILL found it so boring and underwhelming that I actively chose to stop playing and consider it a waste of money
>>722998891if you think Rage 2 is fast-paced, then you are a geriatric grandma
>>722996759No one buys games based on covers it's not 2000s anymore
>>722996759Rage 2 has less things to do than Rage 1. It deserved the hate.
>>722999334Exactly nobody bought the game based on the cover.
>>722999683They always looked at the BACK cover!
>>722996759The first one is a glorified tech demo. Why should I play this one?
>>722996759Cringe? That's the worst box art of all time.
>>722996759I didn't even finish Rage 1 you think i'll even glance at the shitty looking sequel?
>>722996759Liked the combat, but the open world was kinda shit.