>14 years of difference
>>722999480Advancements in technology have led to a pistol that shoots on its own, so that's neat.
I've never played a Battlefield game but right looks way better even just with this screenshot of a compressed video overlay. Much better lighting system and more detailed textures. No the leap is not going to be as great from PS1 to PS2 because fidelity has diminishing returns.
>>722999480and somehow hardware that perfectly runs the left cannot possibly run the right
>>722999480I guess graphics can only get so realistic. I wish devs focused on smoother animations and gunplay. They all feel too arcadey nowadays
>>722999480And it shows. 6 has way more detail, which in this comparison is a bad thing for readability.
>>722999743my hardware can run left and right
>>722999856nailed itright pic hurts the eyes trying to scan for enemies
>>722999983fucking centrist
>>722999480surely all those buildings are destructible and create realistic chunks of concrete and those drapes fly in the wind while the liquid in the tanks spills beautifully in real time, with amazing lighting effects, right?
>>723000038good, it's warfare not peacefare you aren't there to scan for anything it's chaos
>>722999480fixed
>>722999480>just more cluttergodzaaamn. hilarious how little visuals mean in 2025.
>>723001185
>>722999480right looks better graphically but left looks clearer which is preferable for a shooter game where you don't want to be squinting all the time just to try and make out the enemy players through all the shadows and clutter
>>722999480not nearly enough meaningless visual clutter on the rightdo better
>>723001185>nooooo! I have the right to cheat in your game! lmao seething tranny
>>722999480>the mountains in the distance look more shaded in BF3. we are literally going backwarrds.
>>723001316Kek
>>722999480why does it look worse(and play worse) in every single way?likehow?
>>722999480If it ran as well as BF3 I wouldn't mind. How does it run btw? Do the BF games still run on The Frostbite Engine?
>>723002492Can't sell GPUs if you don't push the meme tech
>>723000038shooters use different lighting for players (enemies) for them to be easily visiblethere is an option to disable it in bf6 btw
>>723001540Explain how Secureboot affects cheaters in any way.
Right looks a lot better. Lighting is important. Quite an achievement. Could that be done static?I'd like to see costs allocated to action.
>>723004373They feel compelled to cheat more because they see it as a challenge :^)
>>722999480bf6 is LITERALLY bf3 but with worse performance
Apologize
>>722999480both have shitty filters on top of them
>>723001549Prebaked vs "reel time" lighting
>>723000387this is what I thought video games would be like in the future. it's why indie voxel games got so popular. not this same shit with a different coat of paint.
>>722999480I thought /v/ always complained that games focus too much on graphics and not gameplay, and now when a AAA game focuses more on gameplay /v/ seethes?
>>722999581Lol
>>722999480Right looks visibly better when you actually play the game.
>>723005907>the less performant real deal looks like shit compared to the fake dealYes, we're going backward. UE5 indirectly causes a regression by lowering the bar while "gaymurs" just continue eating shit and moaning about people without overpriced GPUs while having an AGP x1600 themselves.
>>722999480the left is modded right?
>>723001316top kek
>>722999480>left has no female combat unit representationunplayable
that's diminishing returns for you
>>722999624left played MUCH better...and had a better art style (picrel)
>>723001316i member
>>723009410Handcrafted by artists vs "real time simulation" is always a losing game to anybody with taste.The Arkham remaster is my favorite example, all the pretty new unreal lighting technology and realistic effects utterly rob Arkham Asylum of any atmosphere and presence it had. And replaces it with hollow "realism" in a game about Batman doing kickflips while punching supervillains in a creepy insane asylum. Just a fundimental misunderstanding of artistic choice.
When I set the graphic to overkill or whatever the highest level is named I couldn't believe my eyes. I was certain it was modded BF4 that I played just a couple of weeks ago. I reset my computer because I thought some settings were not applied in game. There is no graphical progress at all. Just more stuff on the map. It is horrible. What's more, spotting enemies is much harder. Not only becuase of the clutter but also its fucked up lighting. Try to enter some hangar and there will be entire fucking unit just laying on the ground in the shadows completely invisible. Also that map in Tajikistan has the shitiest possible tonal and color mapping with bumped up darks and highlights. Just like it was some UE3 game.
>HDR>OLED>240Hz+The main advances have been display-related, not graphical. Those really make a difference, but the funny thing is the above works even better on older games. Pic related looks absolutely fucking stellar on my 163PPI OLED and I'm guaranteed 240fps. Too bad it doesn't have HDR but whatever, still looks amazing especially since the game understands contrast and blacks are actual blacks.Meanwhile AAA slop is all brown and grey regardless of your panel.
>>723014457>Meanwhile AAA slop is all brown and grey regardless of your panel.And runs at 40 FPS with TAA smearing, forgot to say.
>>723001185>>723001316samefag. Kill yourself
>>723011104god i miss ziba tower so goddamn much!
>>723014457>Pic related looks absolutely fucking stellar on my 163PPI OLEDIt looked stellar on CRT until they took it away from us. I'd even argue most games still look better on CRT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvRyVZWuvQ4
I did not buy Battlefield 6
>>723001185Based. I'm glad I stopped playing online/multiplayer shit 2 years ago. Just in time to avoid the extra-cancerous shit like this. Also helps that all of such games these days are garbage with short lifespans.
>>722999480battlefield 3 looks fucking stunning to this day
>>723016472stunning and brave
>dead so soon, like the game itselflmao
