>83% positive reviews>747,000 player peak/v/ lost BIGLY
hey im playing this right now
>>723048374i'm still on the edge for buying this, is it really as good as a lot of people are saying?
>>723048319dont they need 100 million to break even
>>723048406It's the best Battlefield has been since BF1, for whatever that's worth.
>>723048319retarded goymers will never stop consooming shitty slop
>>723048406It's a Battlefield 3 rehash but the destruction has more detail.This is either good or bad depending on what you want.
/v/ lost what biglynobody caresnobody said it would fail because it obviously had too much momentum from COD suiciding to the fortnite audiencecouldn't even break it's mid-friday peak playercount which is kinda odd.
>>723048406Better than the last two games by a mile. Still nowhere near as good as 4.
>>723048319oh no...the npcs bought the current thing again...this affects me deeply...Go look at MHWilds to see what will happen in the next 2 weeks.
>>723048319I cant believe WE lostwhat did we lose?
>>723048442good enough for me>>723048479yeap, that's all i need>>723048551i like what i'm seeing here, fellas
>>723048319Damn, 700k people are retards that intentionally brick their computers and install malware on it, oh and of course probably have that windows 11 spyware garbage on their pc's too.
>>723048608didn't Wilds launch with shit reviews, with the problems still not fixed today
>>723048479I wish it had the BF3 maps then it might actually be fun to play. So far it just seems like they decided Operation Metro was a guiding principal and it makes me want to kill myself.>>723048608MH Wilds took a lot longer to really crash and burn and it mostly happened because of the performance thing that the devs completely ignored for so long people stopped coping and got genuinely mad. BF6 is going to go out with a prolonged whimper as the playercount slowly falls and people move onto the next thing.
>>723048319>already lost 200k playerslmao
>>723048801>I wish it had the BF3 mapsDid they shrink Firestorm? It feels way smaller than the original version.
I thought /v/ was saying it was good
>>723048319Look, I'm just not gonna enable secure boot and the TPM okay? I know, I know, I'm sorry
>>723048319the AA sucks ass and shouldnt be in the game
>>723049037Bf6 is a normie game, normies don’t stay in playing vidya on saturday nights
>>723048319The beta was fun, I would be playing it if the price wasn't so ridiculous.
Campaign is mindless military slop, which is kinda refreshing to me in a weird way. It makes me a little nostalgic of my teenage years when I played a lot of generic no name military shooters my dad bought on Xbox.Multiplayer is rad though. Breakthrough defense really is peak Battlefield.
>>723049240Don't be. You are VALID okay anon? Live yourself.
>>723048603>Requires manual removal after game uninstallFucking gross
>PS3 graphics>Named soldiers>Less maps than BF4 (2013 PS3 game)>Less weapons than BF 4>Maps are small as shit>Classes have access to all weapons (WHAT WERE THEY THINKING???)>Weapons don't sound like weapons>Soldiers move like crazy even tho they have like 50 kg of gear on them>No server browser>Aim assist>Battlepass>Bots in servers>Female soldiers>No artillery>Worse destruction than BFBC2 (2010 PS3 game)
We're never getting another good online shooter again, are we.
game runs like shit now
>>723048406I really like it. Battlefield 4, 3, 2 enjoyer here.
>>723048503It's hilarious watching you seethe in your little baby cuck chair
game needs>no female soldiers>movement slowdown when hit>hit punch (especially when zoomed in, snipers should not be able to kill you mid burst after being hit accurately)>headshots that actually do something (rifle = 1 hit kill or close)>nerf accuracy way down when moving/jumping/full auto>FRIENDLY FIRE>FRIENDLY COLLISION BOXES>way slower healing and it should kick in slower>large maps with vehicles and bases>no automatic spotting>less markers in the UI overall, way cluttered right now
>>723048319>games are too expensive>the economy is bad>inflation is killing living standardsso these are just lies? seems like the average joe is able to afford $70 for a yearly slop and powerful enough gaming PC to run it just fine.
>>723053347It's hilarious watching you desperately trying to troll and avoid the argument
>>723053459don't other BF games have the server hardcore setting or something with most of these?
>>723048319How is it lgbt gay woke horse pony?
>>723053507We should increase taxes
>>723053663>hardcorethat used to be normal modefucking casuals
>wait 6-8 months>get it at a vastly reduced price>probably finally have the number of maps that should have been in at launchthis is early access at best, sure the moment to moment gameplay looks good but holy fuck at the balls on these Danish fucks charging full price for something so barebones and the majority of the maps are tiny, they should have waited a few months for the Saudi money to start rolling in to let them create proper maps
>>723053787Extremely woke. Painfully gay. Sold shitloads
>>723053787you need to suck your teammates cock to revive them, its big gay
>>723048479But no Operation Metro
>>723048319i fucking hate extraction shooters i fucking hate extraction shooters i fucking hate extraction shooters i fucking hate extraction shooters i fucking hate extraction shooters
>>723054756Lucky you've got BF6 for your FPS fix then
>>723053787It's really not bad there are women yes but even though women in wars is a retarded concept it makes sense for the current time period, characters don't really have any quirk chungus lines and it's all just straight to business.idk about the campaign though.
Every server is full of bots. Much fun. Skill very needed.
I haven't played a battlefield game since 3 or 4, I don't remember. Didn't /v/ win the whole battlefield drama? I thought the world war 1 battlefield with black and disabled women bombed so hard they had to delay this one for years.
>>723048319Maybe it counts bots as well.
>>723055116>disabled women bombed so hardOn the contrary 2042 was so shit people had rolled back to BFV.
>>723055135no that'd be retarded regardless of implementation
>>723055079>It's really not bad there are women yes but even though women in wars is a retarded concept it makes sense for the current time periodpersonally i'm all for the female draft because """equity""" should at least come with equal responsibilitiesand with the advent of drone warfare everyone's final moments are uploaded to the internet, so by 2050 there will be a large market for videos of female soldiers dying from drones
>>723048319I like the gunplay so far but the launch maps are all just kinda shit to be honest, it needs legacy maps to be absolute ludo. I really want a golf course map like in BC and some modern renditions of some of the maps from BF1 would be kind of neat, and also just port pretty much everything from 2 and we are golden.
>>723055090I went 41-0 on Breakthrough.Feels good man.
game is complete shit. how does it have 83%? there is one good map.
>>723055957It's at 76% overall.
>>723048603What's even the point of having to install all that anti-cheat shit (including fucking with your kernal) if hackers can still manage to bypass all that on day one of the beta?It just punishes regular people who want to play the game and not have to do a bunch of extra bullshit steps.
Play breakthrough and escalation, the game suddenly turns into battlefield 4
>>723056046People defend it by saying some rhetoric like "yeah but at least it stops some people, can't have absolute 100% protection now can we :)" which that point I'd say get fucked to any invasive bloat "anti-cheat" like what this game uses.
>>723056046I just became a good goy and stopped giving a shit, also the secure boot thing was enabled by default on my motherboard.
>>7230484063rd best BF ever imo, after 3 and 1
the battle royale will save the game
*gets nerfed into the ground*
>>723054506Operation Metro is right here
-_-
>>723056597-__-
>Losing players on its launch weekendlol, this shit is flopping.
>>723056239Can someone explain what was wrong with 4? I remember really liking 3 but 4 always felt off to me
>>723056729nigger it's 4 - 5 AM in the civilized parts of the world you'd have to be indian, e*ropean or just sleep deprived to be awake at this hour.
Is there any way to block console aim assisters from my games?
>>723048442It's not current day Call of Duty, for whatever that's worth.
Can I play the multiplayer offline against bots? Like just run a full conquest match with me and all bots??You could do this in PS2 battlefront 2. You could even do it split screen with a buddy. There is no fucking excuse not to be able to do this in 2025 on a ps5
>>723056773For me, 4 had shit maps and the guns felt off. Didn't feel good to play compared to 3. And it ran like shit at launch.
>>723056851retard, it lost over 100k concurrent daily peak in a single day.For it's launch weekend, as a multiplayer game.Thats a hilarious amount of refunds.
>>723050163>Less weapons than BF 4well as long as they didn't make my raifu weak as shit like BF4 I couldn't be bothe->G36C didn't make it innvm fuck dice
>>723056729You WANT it to flop and are looking for anything to excuse you assuming it is. It isn't flopping. It won't flop. You are delusional and seething and need to die.
>>723056995Right, I also think the vehicles felt like ass too but I'm not sure anymore
>>723048319McDonalds is the most popular restaurant on the planet and most of their menu causes cancer.Humans are by default, retarded.
Game isn’t for me, as an actual factual BF vet. As a diehard engineer I need to:>pilot vehicles>be a gunner>repair vehicles>blow up tanks>shoot choppers out of the sky with my rocket launcher (nr1 priority)I haven’t seen any of these things after 3 rounds, so I refunded.
>>723056646>woman of course
>>723053507I would rather starve than miss out on my bing bing wahoos. Fuck Strumpf for making me do this.
>>723056503How many of those do people actually abide by there IRL ?
>>723057434literally not even one
>>723056253Unless they make it F2P to compete with Warzone and just as a way to get people interested in checking out the core game literally no one is going to give a fuck, die hard fans have expressed time and time again they don't care about BR and just wanna play Battlefield
>>723048319fix the stutter issue
>>723048406maps are so shit. Half of them are small infantry meatgrinder maps. Also no water/island maps because no naval combat.
>>723048406its GOTY
>family share disabledkek
Why would I play a worse version of a game I played over a decade ago?
>>723048319The game will be forgotten pretty fast, like every flavor of the month fps.
>>723048319The retards playing this garbage are on the same levels of brainless inbreds as the people who buy sports games.
who could have guessed just making a game fun instead of adding black female disabled queers would be a home runi am shocked!
I really fucking hate these maps. The New York ones are so bad it's incredible.
*screeching*
>>723048503Youre mad
>>723060350Cool, now tell me why you would spend your precious time on earth caring about what normies are enjoying?
REMINDER1. you are not at a high enough skill level for map design to matter to you.2. you are not at a high enough skill level for mode design to matter to you3. open or closed weapons won't make a difference at your skill level4. you are not at a high enough skill level to be the determining factor whether your team wins or loses5. you are not at a high enough skill level to criticise your teammates or lead your squad6. you are not at a high enough skill level for vehicle design to matter to you7. you are not at a high enough skill level to comment on map flow
Eh I liked V more. 6 is fine but it's very cluttered, the pace is a little too fast and modern warfare is gay as fuck.
>>7230560463 letter agencies spyware
>>723061519I just want to never see a controller player again
i dont know why, but i still have more fun on BF4... makes me sad because i was really hyped for a new BF to play but its like playing meatgrinder maps nonstop. its mindnumbing. i like everything else but god the maps make it so bad
straight up not gonna play any game with female soldiers i uninistalled the beta in 2 minutes flatscreeching women is totally what i want to hear when i boot up a war game
>€70It's worth 40 at max
>>723062704is female soldiers now the main complain about this game? if that's the worst thing, it must be pretty good game.
>>723062704seeing as you probably a woman screeching in any other facet of your life it's unsurprising
>>723048406its horrible to be honest>t. BF1 fan
>>723062704Yeah I wonder why they doubled down on that decision. They'd rather risk losing potential revenue over keeping to their main demographic. Then again...battlefield vagina did make millions... I guess gameplay fags now stir the ship.
>Join match>See there's no good 150m+ sight lines on my team/this map>Quit and find another mapBoy I sure wish there was another way to unlock the close range version of recon then getting fucking 50 150m minimum headshots
>>723048406I played the Beta, it's fun, but still doesn't hold a candle to the original BF games on the old Reactor Engine.Frostbite was a mistake imo. The only good thing they have made was BC2.
>>723048319>no rushwtf? i need my meat grinder simulator
>no server browsertrash
>>723066441wrong thread
>>723055090>retard is playing initiation breakthrough that clearly says it's a bot mode
I just want to know if the full version have better and bigger maps or not. Beta got boring quick because of the cod like maps. Spawn, die, repeat.
>>723048319If it has soldiers of the female variety, it's a no from me.
They need an option to remove the female voice lines, they are irritating
>>723068946They need to make it a purchasable option and make even more money.
>>723063578it's mediocre at best, desu.
>>723048319It's an actual garbage. But it doesn't matter when your PR campaign this strong.
Great gaslighting campaign by EA this time around. But I still don't expect more than 100k players by month's end and by new year's eve articles will drop of it losing 99% of its playerbase. This happens every time with westshit AAA slop.
>>723056597Bruv why would you care that you have to play female? Nothing wrong with a man putting on a dress anyway.
>>723056597It's okay, i like shooting at female nato soldiers.
>>723048319What's more bewildering than people wasting time shitting on games they don't play, are the people who run defense on imageboards and other media for games instead of actually playing them.
>>723048406It's not nearly as good as Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 2042, but it's better than Battlefield 3, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V. It's about as good as Battlefield 4.
>>723048319Looks like a game I would play for couple days and never touch again.
>>723056046Bans are delayed amd the cat "girl" did get banned before the second beta werkend started.
>>723071784Walk me through your thought process.You think Battlefield 2, the title with the best physics in the series, is comparable to Battlefield 2042, the title with the worst physics in the series? And you believe that Battlefield 6, a reskin of Battlefield 2042, is better than Battlefield 3 and as good as Battlefield 4, which are both neutered, skill compressed versions Battlefield 2? You also believe that Battlefield 1 and Battlefield V, which are both reskinned versions of Battlefront, which is best deacribed as "on-rails", are comparable to the rest of the series in anything but name?
>>723048603>both required you to buy a pcholy fucking kikes bros amiright
>>723048319Battlefaggots buying the same game 6 times in a row for the past 10 years.
>>723056326Compared to beta or other games?
>>723065940breakthrough is basically the same shit. if you really want a meatgrinder pick sobek city as well.
>BF is back
I'm on 50 ping and I still only see 1-2 hits on my screen then the kill info says I was hit 5+ times, does this ever work properly?
>>723049148No, the area with the flags is the exact same size. They did move the team spawns closer to the flag area however
>>723072225Physics? What the fuck you on about. These games are not very physics based and they all have similar physics.>And you believe that Battlefield 6, a reskin of Battlefield 2042, is better than Battlefield 3 and as good as Battlefield 4, which are both neutered, skill compressed versions Battlefield 2?Battlefield 6 is a reskin of battlefield 3/4, and yes 3/4 are inferior in every way to 2. 6 plays absolutely nothing like 2042. 2042 plays more like battlefield 2 than any other game in the series, primarily because it’s the only battlefield game since 2 that has big open sandboxy maps with a big focus on vehicles.>You also believe that Battlefield 1 and Battlefield V, which are both reskinned versions of Battlefront, which is best deacribed as "on-rails", are comparable to the rest of the series in anything but name?Those are also trash, V especially. 1 is ok but feels more like bad company.2 is the best on, 2042 is also really good. 4 and 1 are decent. 1942 is classic fun and 1943 was a fun more arcadey version of it. 2142 was ok but maps were way worse than in 2.
Imagine losing 200k players on the first weekend launch. This is gonna be a wasteland by the end of th year.
I refuse to open up my BIOS.So I will not buy this game. Simple as. I shouldnt have to be a coder and rearrange the back end of my computer, to install their malware so I can play. The devs failed.
>>72307287050 ping is high you third world rat. Stop shutting up my servers
>>723074474Oof, yeah we are looking at another Monster Hunter Wilds situation here
>>723048319>20% of people think your game is hot ass>Very positive
>>723074474It's gonna be at ~20k cope mode by Thanksgiving
>>723048726How's that futa visual novel you currently grinding on your Zorin OS because you're too dense of a contrarian to even use real shitux?
Stop being a flat game boomer and start playing VR battlefield.
>>723048319>/v/ It's COD>game gets COD numbers /v/ won it's COD now.
>>723075878The recent CoD beta got like 1/10th the numbers of the BF6 beta
>>723057283Have you tried actually playing the game?
>>723075965That's what I'm saying it has replaced COD to be the new COD.This isn't complicated. They've been trying to get the COD audience for decades and they finally got it.
>>723048374Are you having a blast? Did they return to form?
>>723076060>return to form>locked weapons is hidden at the back of the bus and the back of the bus is entirely randomlol
>>723075965COD numbersplural COD is more than one game.
>>723071219It's as if they are being paid to do it...
>>723071219I'm currently out, and can't play bf on my phone, but I sure can trigger retards on this mighty fine board. Bf6 is good. There's nothing else good in this genre coming out for at least another year, I believe Activision will shit themselves in 2026 even harder, so I think bf6 is safe for a god while while, and few months in we'll start getting some actually fun/good portal creations.
>>723048319I will not give EA permission throguh my bios, sorry
>>723053507Congratulations, you have finally learned 90% of people live a life more expensive than they can afford
how is the performance?
>>723057024>G36C didn't make it ing36 is one of the earliest rifles you unlock anon...
Why didn't they just make big maps? That's literally all they had to do
>>723048319Can't wait for someone to find a serious exploit to either destroy your pc or leak your information online. If you buy any of these kernel level anti cheat games you are a colossal retard.
>>723075965>>723076046Nah CoD is eternal, it won't do huge numbers on Steam but they will announce the sales and its going to be very successful.
>>723079601wasn't this the case with CoD and titan fall and activision and EA gave 0 shits?
>>723079239not bad, minimum specs are a 2060 apparently
>>723048406>>723071784Nope. Just alone the maps are shit tier, probably the worst in the entire series.
>80% positive is considered good
>>723083815>more than 50% positive is enough to be the president
>>723085097>nation is basically split 50/5050% positive is 100% from your side
>>723085330>his nation only has 2 sides
>>723055079>there are women yesYou're downplaying it. Women are outnumbering men. Every single game is chock full of women shrieking.Why? Male characters are locked behind challenges, and in the case of NATO support there's no males at all.
