JUST
>>723248016looks reasonable?
>30ghow long is this game?
>60fpsthis ain't the bronze age anymore come on man
>>723248016I'm good to go then. I thought the requirements were going to be insane
>>723248016What's the point of releaing requirements for a game literally everyone can see will be garbage? Nobody is buying it anyway so
>>723248016low requirements very nice
Nobody cares.
>>723248016>30gbSeems strange to see such comparatively tiny file size
>>723248418Nobody cares about your crippling obsession, faggot. Keep it up.
>>723248016Is this going to be the first well optimized UE5 game?
>>723248657I thought Robocop and E33 were well optimized.
>>723248016>30gb8 to 12 hour long game filled with dialogueepic
when the heckerino did 5600x become the bare minimum?im on 3600x how is that already obsolete
nice i thought it would be way higher
>>723248016>with DLSS Perf for 60fpsThe absolute state of PC gaming
>>723248016>mfw 1440p rtx 5080 amd ryzen 9 9950x3d
>>723248771telemetry, same as why 7 runs better than 10
>>723248016Works fine on my Gateway
>>723248771>High CPU demand>NPCs logic worse than games from 20 years agoClassic nu-dev bamboozle.
>>723248771AM4 was dogshit for vido gaymes until the x3d came out.
>>723248016>not even a single section for ultra settings at 1080/1440/2160 without fake frames or blurry ass performance mode DLSSgrim
Why does it require Windows 11? What does W11 have that W10 doesn't?
>>723248317dunno
>>723248016>fake frames>60fpsloool
>>723249208Ultra setting likely ramped up too much gay tracing to work at native resolution.
>>723249259one of the worst game in gaming history runs better than paraslopi have a really ominous feeling about eu5
>>72324801630GB LOOOOOOOOOL its over, 6 hour shooter confirmed. all dialogue options are fake and have no consequences
I'm good for 4k 60fps.Shame it is only 60fps.
>>723249075My 2002 eMachine will run this no problem!
>>723249376I'm most worried about the slowdown. Vicky 3 grinds to al halt with all the pops after like 50 years
>>723249205Um actually the 5000 series was better than the Intel 10th/11th series which were current at the time.
>>723248016GTX 1080 bros... We're barely surviving
>5800x3dEither they are bruteforcing cpu performance by leaning on the cache or they just pulled a cpu out of their rectum. 50/50 odds on which.
>>723249686Maybe they just didn't test on am5
>>723248016>Windows 2Excuse me????
>>723248016>Windows IIWhat?
>>723249674You've been barely surviving in AAA for like 5 years now. Fucking vega is more usable than pascal now, at least it can play doom tda and Indy
>>723249674the 1080TI was a god card though
>>723248016It looks great though?I have a base 5070 and I'll be able to run it at max settings in 2K. And even a fucking 1060 can run it
>>723249790>>723249806It's binary so it's 3
>>723248016>my 2012 PC cant reach 60fps wow its shit
>>723248016>CPU+ram probably able to run three instances of it simultaneous and still not even get toasty>GPU won't hit 30 fpsUpdating your PC components gradually makes for some interesting gaming
>>723248657No, it's pretty much guaranteed to run like shit.The only well-optimized UE5 games are The Finals, Split Fiction, and Fantasy Life i (I don't even know if I'd count that since it's going for a super simple aesthetic, I genuinely thought it was UE4), and none of those games use UE5's flagship features (nanite and lumen).
>>723248016GPU requirements look suspiciously low for a UE5 game.>30GBSo this game is very short, huh.
>>723248016Hmm, are CPU requirement usually that low? What games recently have a high CPU requirement anyways?
>>723248016>4070>with dlss and framegen to hit 60 at """4k"">meaning it hits 30fps at 720pLmao, I hate modern gaming so much
>>723249751Which is also absolute insanity.>hey we didn't test on the most popular current platform because we didn't feel like it so our suggested cpu is an unobtanium one lolz
>>723248741Fuck no.
>>723249879>It looks great though?Does it?It looks like a UE4 game from 2017.Actually, I might even argue it looks worse than that.
>>723250014it runs on xbox series s and that console is only slightly better than switch 2 which is a ARM handheld.
>>723250025retard learn to read, it's 4k quality not ultra performancelooks like you could just do balanced dlss and hit 60fps before fg>>723250104Name a game you think is optimized
>>723250104Closest that I have seen UE5 coming close to being optimized so far is Grounded 2.E33 runs like ass with a valium suppository in comparison
>>723248016>only have w10It's over...
>>723248016>RTX 5080 for 60FPS (fake 240 with 4x multiplier) at 1080p rendering (DLSS Performance at 4k is 1080p in reality)Holy fucking lmao, this shit looks like an absolute dumpster fire. Imagine needing a 5080 for 1080p 60FPS.
>>723250273>Name a game you think is optimizedResident Evil 4 Remake. Doom Eternal.>>723250302E33 looks like pure blurry ass no matter what hardware you have. Everything is caked in UE5's generic material editor.
>>723248526That just means invisible walls up the yin yang. The city is probably only 3 or 4 streets like a Yakuza game
>>723250793>implying you need more
>>723248016Is this game shilled only here? Nobody outside 4chan even know they got back from the rewriting announcement.
>>72324816410hr story 20h with side content
>>723250582the consequence of jeets
Graphics don't mean shit in a game. It's gameplay first!
>>723252174Yeah, i'll be cautiously optimistic since CDPR has a good track record so far but the way they've been bleeding talent to retirement or Blank and Rebel Wolves. I definitely would hope for a good game but I'm not going to hold my breath really
>>723252462That is why text adventures remain the best games.
>>723249898>Windows 3.II
>>723248016What the hell, that's unexpected..Big if true, i'll actually buy it just for having 8gbs ram on system requirements.But i will wait for the release and see gameplay, i don't trust these bitches
>>723248016Compared to many recent games this is reasonable
Let me guess, its UE5? You can tell because those requirements are grossly inflated for what the game looks like. The game easily looks like a bog standard PS4 AA title.
Nice watch, nerd
>>723248741Agreed on Robocop. Ran very well, and also is one of the best looking titles ever made.
>>723248016I expected worse from the UE5 game.Happy to see that at least they optimized the game somewhat.
>>723253601>one of the best looking titles ever made.Every character that isn't at least 90% metal looks godawful.
>30gigsSo the game is either tiny or the devs learned about this ancient technique called "asset compression."
>>723248741Not open-world games stupid retard.
>>723253781Sadly we all know which case is more likely
>>723253781Unless they used new Nvidia AI shit, no way they compressed the game that much.
>>723253751What looks bad about them?
>>723248016the game looks like this btw
>>723254226>ps3 graphicsnice
>>723248016I'm surprised the minimum is that low. What engine is it on?
>>723248016>extended sys reqsPure mental retardation.
>>723254226And this is Robocop on a 1070.
>>723248016It's gonna run like shit anyway.
>>723254226Unreal Engine 3 was always my favorite
>>723254603Looks about the same.
I'm surprised devs are sticking with recommending 16GB RAM, I know it's never explicitly stated but with the ammount of caching going on I definitely noticed improvements going up to 64
>>723248016>Windows 11Not playing that leftist shit.
>>723254419If you turn off the 20+ post processing effects you could run it on a phone
>>723254887Starbreeze Engine
>>723248016meh. unoptimized. static lighting game doesnt need ue5. actually no games need ue5. if this was on ue4 it would be running at 300 fps with the same graphics.
>>723254603>not hiding behind fog because you know your game looks goodbased>>723254226>hiding behind fog because game looks like shit with ps2 assets and nothing to show offs_yjak game
>>723250582The 1080p of 4K DLSS Performance looks infinitely better than actual raw 1080p.
>>723249259thought this was the same image at firstall these graphic design templates look the same
>>723248016>5600x>rx 9070>1440 monitoryup, its gayman tiembtw how can retards not afford a decent rig? Just get a job.
>>723249898Windows 2 Episode 2
>>723248016I don't see what's the problem or I'm forced to call you a poorfag because you don't have 5 year old hardware?
I'm good to go but it looks fucking terrible so I will not be playing it.
everyone is so used to the gigabloat of AAA games seeing 30 gigs raises eyebrowsit's either gonna be a visual novel with only one city zone, or a really short action game with only the one city zone.
>>723255126Fuck.
>made one cute nerdy girl>she's most likely a bait and switch villainfor fuck's sake
>>723256443which one?
>>723248016>Recommended specs are a 4 year old low end GPU and CPUOh Lord this is truly the end.
>>723256661kinda fits with how the game is like half a decade late
>>723256518Safia
>>723248418>Obsessed over the success of a video gameYou are such a loser.
>>723254226looks comfy
I'm way above specs, but 1080p/60hz is good enough for me.So good to go I guess.One week. Can't wait. However stupid it may be, i'm actually feeling eager to finally get my hands on the game.
>>723254197Not him, but the human skin looked pretty bad in well-lit indoor areas from what I remember. Looked much, much better than E33 at least.
>>7232480161060 6GB bros we cannot stop fucking winning
>>723248987same except 9800x3d
>>723253781The DLCs contains the other 70gb.
>>723248771a 5600 is like 50 bucks and way faster than a 3600. no reason to still be on that.
>>723256661Most anons have a pc that is close to a decade old so these requirements are plain bullshit.
>>723248016That is super normal.Recommended specs are a several years old mid tier card, minimum is a 10 year old mid tier card.This is conservative if anything.
>>723258839the minimum specs are mid range from a decade ago
>Windows 11
>>723248016What is that bullshit in the extended, an ad for shitty njudea features?
>>723248741>E33It's not the most egregious example of bad UE5 optimization, but it sure as hell wasn't good. this one looks weirdly fine though(still bad, but almost within reason).
>>723248016>DLSS + Fucking Graphics 2X>DLSS + Mother Fucking Graphics 4Xhot damn
>>723249947You can include Pseudoregalia as well, but that's a UE5 game trying to emulate the look of a N64 game.
It's gonna be great
>>723248418It's anti-shill anon!
>>723248016convinced AMD/Nvidia have a slush fund for AAA companies to artificially drive up minimum requirements so the latest SKUs always sell
Can't wait to pirate
>>723248016>dlss and framegen in the system requirements detailsIt's dogshit, Jim.Also what is going on there with the Windows 10/11 shit? If it runs on Windows 10 than it should just said "Windows 10 64-bit minimum" and not have an entire line in the chart loosely implying things about the OS.
>>723260425but the minimum requirements are 10 year old low end parts, and at 1080p...
>3070+3600x for 1440pthat's exactly my pc and monitor then cool. What engine is it? It seems way too reasonable if it's ue5
>>723248016I hope that win11 recommendation means 24H2 isn't going to fuck me up the ass yet again
>>723260798I hope you like your ass being loose for the next few months. It's gonna be big, rough, and go for multiple rounds.
>>723260568at the lowest settings probably dipping below 30fps*
>>723260902yeah yeah I already heard 25H2 didn't fix the whole system freeze meme some games had
>>723260747It is ue5Maybe it's like silent hill f where they rename the presets so that ultra ingame is equivalent to medium in almost every other ue5 game. Lock away epic settings to people willing to edit a cfg tweak, cut down on poorfag seethe and refund requests.>>723260965Sounds good to me, maybe don't hold on to budget components for a decade.
>>723248016>DLSS Frame Generation set to 2x
>>723248241who tf plays at more than 60 FPS?
>manipulative image implying that Microbloat® Shitdowns© 11 is better than 10 and doesn't just make everything slower because it needs 16 Gb RAM for its own always-online spy/bloatware>people unironically believe it
>>723260965What the fuck do you expect, to be able to max everything on a 1060 for the rest of your life?
>>723261050You expect the small indie studio to fix their operating system? Shame on you. Rajeet can only work 17 hours a day prompting AI. You want to make him work overtime?
>>723261368at 1080p you should, yes
>>723248016how can this shitty looking game be this demanding?
>>723261273Indians who enjoy playing vidya while listening to sounds of jet engines revving next to their ears. Probably related to their fascination with trains.
>>723261462no you shouldn't this is fucking retarded, PC gaming isn't for you, stick to consoles
>>723261485>this demandingMan I shutter to imagine the piece of shit the brown denizens are using as a daily driver
>>723250192Looks pretty ok given the state of the industry. For reference what I consider looking "good" is visual clarity and high contrast, which was lost somewhere around 2000s.
>>723261530>noo you GOT to pay the kiketax+H1b tiplol
>he doesn't update his pc
Why the hell have people actually started using the term "2K" when it isnt even close to 25601440p and a 1080p would be a 2k monitor if a 2160p is a 4k monitor, maybe I'm autistic.
>>723261643the cool thing about PC gaming is you have thousands and thousands of other older games and indies games you can continue to play on your atrocious rig, so why don't you do that instead of whining and demanding to be catered to in every thread about a new release, I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years ago
>>723261859You know optimisation implies the game should look better
>>723248164>>723248526>>723248754>>723250793Storage size has nothing to do with length. It has everything to do with optimization. AI upscaled textures, ai upscaled cutscenes, forcing everybody to download language audio files for every language under the sun including swahili, uncompressed audio, etc.
>>723261867Marketing magiks, just a spell that used to work better on TV buyers
>>723261615>For reference what I consider looking "good" is visual clarity and high contrastThen you must think this game looks like shit, because it's not a visually clear game, by design.
>>723262015It is just impossible with obsolete tech. You cant run a 4K game on an integrated intel gpu either
>>723262182>icons and size look like they were made for a touchscreen
>>723262182It's not real because you use a dlss/frame generation so it doesn't count
>>723262182This looks worse than The Division, a game that will be literally a decade old in about 5 months.
>>723262015optimization means that it runs better. not that it looks better.
>>723261965>but my prooogressThere is no fucking excuse to suddenly need more power for the same resolution, you can beg for your "2 fps moar plz" at the UPPER range of output, not at the lower one
>>723261608fuck off, there's no way this shit should be this demanding and you know it. and i'm referring to the 4k ultra settings now, just so you now, not 1080p high potato mode.
>>723262276Yeah but you can run 4k video because the formats aren't jeeted
>>723248016Does anyone even care? We're 6 days from release and it's what? Barely cracking the top 40 in sellers,?It flopped.Games looked bad and it lacked attractive women
>>723248016holy fucking shit. I know these charts are almost always bullshit, but it's still grim as hell.
>>723248016>60fps on a 2 generation old low range cardwhat's just about it?>>723248164why tf do you think length has anything to do with file size? is this a zoomer myth?
>>723261965>I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years agoFaggots like you have been purchasing the latest hardware as soon as it gets released and games have only looked worse
>>723262539Videos are pre-rendered, meaning it takes a lot less procesding power. Decoding is a whole different matter.
>>723261368When the games look like (or worse than) games from ten years ago, yeah. The requirements shouldn't magically go up when the visuals stay the same.
>>723261965>I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years agoOkay, but we're not getting that, this game doesn't look better than games from 2018, so where's the progress exactly outside of selling more graphics cards to retards?
>>723248016pretty good
>>723262058This particular story-focused game is going to have a lot of voice lines, and it sure as hell is not optimized. It's going to be a 5 hour "experience" at best.
>>723262182"by design"no lmao its just RETARD developers sticking to the ue5 defaults because all ue5 games look like SHIT without the catastrophic fog they fucking use all the time
>>723262749You're missing the point, you can apply same logic to video games but unlike with streaming video games are have disregarded technological improvements that could provide more performance or they're stop gap solutions like AI
>>723258839i know you're posting from brazil or indonesia but most anons are white tech workers
>>723262979No, I mean it looks to take place in Seattle in the winter, which means lots of heavy snow, and thus less visual clarity.But yes, UE5 games almost universally look like shit and none of them really justify the performance for the visuals on offer.
>>723263089lolno
>>723258839>almost decade old partsI refuse to believe that
>>723263184Steam collects and published data on the hardware of its user base. It's not a matter of belief.
im so fucking sick of third worlders on /v/ complaining whenever a game can't run on their 12 year old laptop. nobody gives a shit that you make $600 a month and can't afford anything else, shut the fuck up holy shit i miss when only the first world had internet access
>>723262529>and i'm referring to the 4k ultra settings now, just so you now, not 1080p high potato mode.how DARE a game require a current gen midrange card to play at 4k 240fps!!!
>>723263184The theme song of the tranny
>>723248016>tfw 2070 Super CHAD playing at 1080p 60FPSi'm good to go on High, /v/ros. woo! feels good to not have fallen for the 4K jew.
>>723263089Considering everyone in here is crying about the spec requirements of this game I seriously doubt it, there's even some retard in here that thinks resolution size is directly correlated with computation requirements, there's no way that retard works in tech and isn't currently posting from a favela.
>>723263390>SAAR YOU ARE BLOODY TRANNY BASTARDWhy can't you "people" use your own websites instead of shitting up ours?
>>723261273niggas who like having to upgrade their hardware every two years instead of twice a decade.
Does this thread prove that poorfag seethers won't be happy until games are made to run on a gt 1030 or gtx 750 or something?
>>723263291>20xx series>1650easy to spot 3rd worlders
>>723248016These spec reqs honestly aren't awful.
>>723263618Yes. Their needs should be catered.
>>723263406>everyone hereit's a few loud brown people, normal people look at the chart, think "neat looks like it runs fine" and move on with their day.
>>723261965>I want to see actual advancements in gamesGames have looked the same or worse since at least 2019, arguably 2014
>>7232480161080p 60fps is playable with a 300$ video card.Sound about the same as always.
>>723263705They were, well over a decade ago when that GPU was relevant
>>723263791Alien Isolation really was a graphical marvel and I rarely ever say that.
>>723263804NOOOO DUDE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND I GOT TRICKED INTO PLAYING AT 4K 144FPS BY A LINUS TECH TIPS VIDEO OF COUNTER STRIKE GO AND I CAN'T TURN BACK!!! RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEE!!!
>>723249259Hey, Gollum had issues but it was quite beautiful at times.Don't have my screenshot folder at hand to prove it but there's some cool vistas here and there.And that goth elf chick you posted was hot in the first scene you meet her
Is this game actually going to be an imm-sim like VTM:B? The devs have only ever made walking sims and a horror game (walking sim variant), so my expectations for the imm-sim gameplay are low.
>>723263791Not to mention, game design has regressed. All that additional power is used for flashy shit while actual game design is left on the wayside anyway, so why care?To which you'll have to add all that power wasted on allowing people to brute force issues rather having to produce optimized code.
>>723248016I mean, I'm poor as all shit and I have no interest in playing this game, but I don't understand why games keep having heavier and heavier requirements while looking worse or the sameWhen RDR1 came to the PC it initially required way more expensive hardware than RDR2, even though it's ten years older and looks itI know optimization is something devs don't do anymore because they're all women or brown, but how the fuck cant you at least keep things how they were 10 years ago?
>>723264419An imm-sim is just a walking sim that lets you jump and climb into vents.
>>723264513no shut UP
>>723264419Negro, it's not even an RPG, let a alone and imm-sim
>>723264574SEARCH YOUR FEELINGS
>>723264507>while looking worse or the sameBecause you're not keeping up with hardware upgrades. Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.
>>723248016>ULTRA>dlss
>>723264649>Because you're not keeping up with hardware upgradesNo, I have friend with better PCs, it looks bad on theirs too.>Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.Why no single screenshot or video reflect that?
>>723248016I play at 1080p and I always turn off post processing and motion blur so those requirements are surprisingly nice. I guess this 3060 Ti is still never getting replaced.
>>723248016You can play the damn game on a potato GTX1060 from like 10 years ago what more do you want?
>>723264725>No, I have friend with better PCs,>Why no single screenshot or video reflect that?why are nonwhites so fucking funny
>>723264834Post hand to prove whiteness
>>723261273Folks who aren't poor as shit
>>723248128This.
>>723248016>tfw can run it at 4k ultra+ without dlssfeels goodman
>>723264725>I have friend with better PCWhat are you a fuckin caveman? Dumbass esl posters can't even type
>>723264513
>>723264725idk what to tell you then. Go play sh2 or anything with path tracing if you want the gains to be insanely obvious.>>723261273I have a solidly midrange build (13600k + 5070) and play everything at 240fps+, monitor caps out at 300-and-something.Newer games I'm starting at like 100fps after dlss (if I don't want to play at potato settings) and turning on fg but still, 120/240/etc isn't an exclusively top end experience anymore.
>>723248016It's a lot for 2017-looking game.
Behold, the only well-written character in the game
>>723265067How can you tell? There's no such option in the graph.
>>723265375Looks worse than control
>>723248241your eyes cant see more than 24fps per second bro, educate yourself
>>723265441because my pc is a lot better than that
>>723265375She owes me sex.
>>723265619That doesn't necessarily mean it can run it at 4k without dlss. Do you not remember stalker 2?
>>723265718i remember running it flawlessly without dlss, yeahthe same way ive had 0 issues with any unreal5 game thats been released
>>723264649>Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.Ehh, not really.Baked lighting was already typically pre-rendered and thus could easily match current raytracing offerings outside of dynamic ToD (unless you used workarounds to emulate a proper ToD), so lighting hasn't really gotten much better.Reflections have, but even that hasn't been enough to justify the shit performance, especially considering the existence of things like planar reflections and just good old-fashioned rendering the room twice, which is how you end up with shit like the original 360 (and even fucking Wii) version of Dead Rising having proper real-time mirror reflections while the PS5/XSX remake does not.
>>723265891Ok I believe you.
DLSS quality is so good at 4K, and the FPS gains are so high, that you can barely tell the difference between it and DLAA. Even if you can run the game at 60+ FPS with just DLAA, you’d still choose DLSS for the massive performance gains.It’s really only at 1440p or 1080p where DLSS and FSR4 start to have problems — which is why /v/ is complaining. Same for MFG for everything not multiplayer if you optimized your system to reduce latency already.
>—all you have to know about that poojeet shill
>>723265718>Do you not remember stalker 2?Anons seem to forget about that game.In fact, these specs are suspiciously similar to Stalker 2's.
>>723248016>30GBthis could be good, or bad
>>723266546...and we had thread upon thread of anons claiming stalker 2 runs like shit on their pc because, y'know, decade old hardware. The simple fact is these games have bloated hardware requirements compared to what people ACTUALLY own.
>>723267368Except Stalker 2 also ran like shit even on actually decent hardware.So chances are, this will be the same, as is often the case with UE5 games.
