[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1747746958191827.jpg (736 KB, 2929x2160)
736 KB
736 KB JPG
>starter weapons are shit
>start unlocking weapons
>high damage assault rifle that acts like a DMR
>high damage DMR that acts like a sniper rifle

this is the kind of FUN unbalanced shit that makes multiplayer games good. In battlefield 4, all of the weapons were barely different from each other with tiny little stat differences.
now this is how you design for fun in mind instead of unfun competitive balance.
>>
too obvious
>>
>>723256813
Unlocking weapons has always been a garbage system. Anyone who says otherwise is a no life compslop loser who wants an advantage in a pvp game.
>>
File: j.png (568 KB, 720x817)
568 KB
568 KB PNG
>>723256813
this slop any good? is it at least decent? Will it help me to ignore my meaningless life and inevitable meaningless death for a short while?
>>
>>723256813
Wokeslop
>>
>>723257024
Conquest and Breakthrough are alright when you don't get put in a 3,000 ping server. Everything else is bad.
>>
>>723257024
I'm really having fun now.
Once you get out of the shitty low rank, the game becomes fun.
>>
Why the fuck can't they make battlefield games that allow you to play offline multiplayer against bots? (I don't like playing real people because I suck)

What are you supposed to do if your internet is out or the servers shut down in 20 years? If you had offline multiplayer built in at least you can keep playing the game. Apparently even the campaign requires an internet connection. Fuck you
>>
>>723257125
>There's a ranking system
how in God's name does that work in a BF game? That sounds terrible.
>>
>>723257487
It's not a matchmaking rank. It's you're unlock level.
>>
>>723257487
or is it just like leveling up for playing the game?
>>
>>723257565
ah got it, cool
I got friends who play it so I think I'll give it a shot, haven't played a BF game since 4
>>
File: enab.jpg (43 KB, 569x802)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>723256813
Maybe it's a nitpick but I dislike how few real guns with real world names there are. Many of them have fake names even though past Battlefields used the real ones.
Along with the whole "PMC big enough to wage a world war" setup, it makes BF6 feel less like it has a plausible modern setting and more like it's in an alternate dimension
>>
>>723257024
It's the best BF since at least BF1, and has a good chance to be as good as 4.
>>
>>723257293
They used to have that in 3 and older
>>
>>723256813
The shotguns so far seem good, at least the pump action. It actually has decent range and can one shot.
>>
weapon sounds are a downgrade from 4
>>
>>723257024
It's alright. If you have people to play with then it is way better. Totally solo? Eh, I dunno, feels like CoD with more running.
>>
>>723257841
They do the fake name thing so they don't get sued. Bell tried suing EA into the ground because they used the Huey and the Cobra in 3 and 4 so ever since they've been making up names.
>>
>>723257024
>this slop any good? is it at least decent?
The gameplay itself is pretty good overall. But it's everything else that's trash. Shitty small maps, lack of maps, horrendous UI and menus, poor weapon balancing, poor class balancing, forced HDR that blinds you when you enter/exit buildings, 9/10 community servers are XP/weapon farming/boosting because of the tedious unlock grinds, etc. etc.
>>
Did they implement dedicated servers and remove contollerfags' free aimbots?
If not, I shan't be buying
>>
>>723256813
The suppression/hip fire challenge for the one LMG is making me suicidal. Suppression feels like it takes way too fucking long to proc and just gets me shot in the face doing it.
>>
>>723257841
the campaign did a fantastic job of failing massively to show you what that faction even fucking is
the writers should be banned from going near a keyboard or a pen and paper for the rest of their lives
all they do is exposit badly
>>
>>723257841
>PMC big enough to wage a world war
i havent played much of the campaign yet, but it feels like theyre going to address this. the whole concept so far has been "this pmc suddenly started attacking nato forces out of nowhere and has hardware they shouldnt have. whats going on?"
>>
Why do people care
Bf6 is just 4 again. Did i miss something like 4 servers shutting down? Why didn’t everyone just play that one
>>
>>723257024
It's fun if the hit reg doesn't shit the bed. It's by far the worst aspect of the game rn
>>
>>723257841
>it makes BF6 feel less like it has a plausible modern setting and more like it's in an alternate dimension
Half the ground troops are women, it's already in an alternate dimension.
>>
>>723258230
unfortunately we live in a world where everyone has to move on to the newest thing instead of staying behind.
>>
>>723257024
Its literally just a standard reflex run at guys and quickly aim/shoot repeat shooter from like the 360 era
>>
>>723258125
>Did they implement dedicated servers
No.
>remove contollerfags' free aimbots?
Yes. It's one of the few FPS games in 2025 where I have never felt like controllers were unfair in any way.
>>
>>723257841
The pmc thing is because there are two active wars happening and actual countries makes it feel a little real and leaves a bad taste in most peoples mouths that aren’t pysotic when you remember people really are dying rn
>>
>>723258325
>No.
Yeah, I'm not looking to get matched into an empty lobby 20 times in a row when the playerbase dwindles.
Back to BF4 it is
>>
File: file.png (48 KB, 460x440)
48 KB
48 KB PNG
>>723256813
>the weapons are barely different from each other
>you can use any weapon that has enough stats spike according to your playstyle
>all the weapons are unbalanced as fuck
>everyone just runs with the same weapon that is the meta
both fucking suck but the first one is arguably healthier
>>
>>723256813
Boy I'd love to play it, if only it didn't fucking brick my computer. I pray for the saudis to execute ea shareholders and execs for their rampant faggotry, in much the same way EA executed the decent game studios it acquired for producing quality games.
>>
>>723258254
>using lmg
>get 5-6 hit markers
>they dont die
infuriating
>>
this UI is ten times worse than cod's. why the fuck can't I just select rush or squad deathmatch to fulfill your shitty challenge requirements
>>
>>723258473
>everyone just runs with the same weapon that is the meta
everyone runs with the same weapon because it takes like 30 hours to actually start unlocking shit
>>
>>723258606
>Some faggot with an MP7 one-burts you from 150m away
>>
>>723258616
>why the fuck can't I just select rush or squad deathmatch to fulfill your shitty challenge requirements
You can. Multiplayer -> Custom Search -> Select your modes + maps.
>>
>>723258641
Then when everyone has been playing for years, they figure out which gun is the best and use that because they're faggots
Jusy like the AEK in BF4
>>
>>723258172
>he actually played the campaign
why? any unlocks like in bf1?
>>
>>723258971
mostly character skins.
>>
>>723258172
>well-known multiplayer focused series
I'm honestly dumbfounded they wasted their time including a campaign
>>
>>723257841
As soon as I saw the campaign was about some fictional PMC I knew it would be pure slop. My eyes couldn't roll any harder.
>>
>>723258971
hadn't played a shooter in so long i thought i needed some practice with the controls
>>723259263
what's bizarre is they copied 3's and 4's formula instead of bad company which people actually liked
bad company campaigns were good enough to sell the games to people who had no internet
>>
>>723258389
this was never a problem before.
the whole middle eastern war scenarios spawned out of the iraq and afghan war.
>>
>>723259442
Bad Company worked because it didn't take itself seriously. It's extremely tongue-in-cheek. This one tries way too hard at being super serious while failing to be believable in any way shape or form.
>>
>>723257487
it doesn't, the game is shit
>>
>>723259506
True, but maybe Ukraine makes it more sensitive for Westerners since more white people dying and the EU acting threatened. Plus making the Russian military look less capable than how Battlefields and CoDs have portrayed it
>>
>>723260108
>Plus making the Russian military look less capable
the whole drone warfare threw a massive stick into the spikes of modern warfare.
imagine if insurgencies swarmed US forces with drones.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.