>Fallout 76 stuff gets ported to Fallout 4 before it becomes available to the average person. Seriously, who the fuck thought that multiplayer only game on the Bethesda engine was a good idea? The power to manipulate files and mods is literally a big part of what makes Bethesda games appealing.
>>723454802If people were able to self-host 76 or play a standalone singleplayer version they would have barely made any money by strongarming people into paying for fallout first and an alt to use as a mule
I think fallout 76 is a fun game sometimes
I like it a lot
Fo76 is fine. They burned fucktons of money getting it there, but now with the tv show it's paying massive fucking dividends
>>723454802i thought they revmped it eso style some years ago where its only multiplayer if you want it to be.
>>723454802I haven't played FO4 for a while. Is it really possible to port 76 stuff into FO4? Has anybody successfully done it by now?
>>723455249>it's paying massive fucking dividendsFallout 76 has the same average online player count as on release, Fallout 4 is more popular even on consoles.>>723455270You have to pay $10 a month to play on your own server and it's still online only>>723455337Armour, weapons, settlement objects - basically anything that requires you to spend money can be ported.A full port of Fallout 76 is also possible but it would require a tremendous amount of effort.Ports to New Vegas are also possible but they are not publicly available yet.https://youtu.be/FpHeFRivZms?si=RoqM-lfoPRGxtUeB
>>723454802This thing looks really promising. Maybe I would buy this because it must be extremely cheap
fallout 76 is just another westoid gay nigger tranny live service turd
>>723454802back when I played fo76 religiously you could actually mod some stuff and it was all client sideyou could fuck up balance by replacing stagger and reload animations with shorter ones for exampledo what you will with this information, I don't know if it's still the case. fo76 was a mess from start to finish and I regret ever picking it up.
>>723456010holy poorfag cope batman!
>>723455337>Has anybody successfully done it by now?YesJust recently Anon in /fog/ ported a few things from the upcoming update
>>723454802I genuinely liked f76And the best part is I didn't give them a single cent
>>723454802>Seriously, who the fuck thought that multiplayer only game on the Bethesda engine was a good idea?What engine is ESO on? Hasn't that been doing well enough for itself to warrant continued support and expansions for a decade now.
>>723459146>What engine is ESO on?Same one as SWTOR
>look up fallout 76 on steam>35$ fishing DLCwhat the fuck is going on with this game, I just skipped it thinking it must be extreme slop
>>723454802>Seriously, who the fuck thought that multiplayer only game on the Bethesda engine was a good idea?It's an excellent idea, making it a shitty MMO is not.Just release an official Skyrim Together with a limited amount of players (I'd say 4-6 max) and support for split screen, and you absolutely monopolize the market of smaller/more intimate multiplayer experiences for 20 years.
>>723459276>35$ fishing DLCIt's just your average bundle of FOMO cosmetic items.All gameplay stuff is free but unbearable without a subscription and 90% of all cosmetic items cost real money
>>723459371That isn't part of Todd's Vision
>>723454802people been asking for multiplayer toddslop for as long as i can remembersure i'd prefer co-op to mmo but given the demand i can hardly fault them for trying
>>723459624I really hope a bunch of autists one day rip and port vast majority if not all of assets straight to FO4 and FNV, even the cosmetics. This is pretty much robbery.
>>723462893There are plenty of ports, the problem is that Bethesda and its fanboys don't want you to have them.
