I can't believe such a giant city runs seamless on the switch 2how can anyone say the hardware is bad?
>>724134979bump
>seamless
>>724134979>>724135791is this how you have fun? feigning ignorance for a few laughs? consider suicide
>>724135825but it is, there is no loading screens except for the hotel maybe?>>724135872what do you mean
>>724135825OP is a ESL because he misspelled "seamless".
>>724136105>is a ESL>seamless is a misspelling
>>724135949the texturing isn't seamless
>>724136246but seamless games have nothing to do with that, that's like saying elden ring is not seamless because you can't see super far away?
>>724136284I know I just wanted to bring up the shitty texture work, sorry
>>724134979Post a webm of the game actually in motion. I need a good laugh right now.
>>724136383how do I do that
>>724136428Take a screenshot 60 times per second
>>724136513that's not possible you stupid bastard
>>724136173Good morning, saar.
>>724134979Huh?
>>724136662>doubling down
>>724136803Do not redeem the seamless Switch 2.
>>724136869no this is not about that, this is about you thinking seamless is a misspelling or a typo
>>724136869U are a indian because u misspelled seamless.
>>724134979>seamless>has seams
>jeets cannot into adverbsgood to know, I'll add this to my toolbox
>>724137184>tripling down
>>724137253swing and a miss
>>724137345>quadrupling down
>>724136662idgi
>>724134979can't they draw some variants of these flat 2D plants?
>>724139176there are some iirc
>>724134979good morning sar the beuteful city is blody huge right, please kind perform the redeeming of the Windows. we sirs hate the mother fuck digimons basterds madarchod
>>724140327ESL
>>724141914so is nintendo
>>724140327nintendo sells in india?
>>724134979They had giant cities running seamlessly on PS1 (Silent Hill).
>>724139176It costs $400,000 to draw a texture for one window.
Sorry, you posted on the wrong board>>>/vp/
>>724142209True.I will have to take the L on this one.
>>724143229never apologize to ESLs
>>724136246kek
>>724134979>wow the Switch 2 can render these giant cubes with textures slapped on such a good game such a good city
>>724145458what is wrong with the graphics exactly?
>>724147195It's hard to take this as an honest question.
>>724147293so you have no answer?
Okay yeah you have no interest in an honest discussion. I'm just going to preemptively accept your concession and save myself the time.
>>724147492tell me what the issue is
>>724134979It looks like their strategy was to make all the buildings really simple and combine them all into one relatively low-poly mesh, which is fast to render on the notoriously draw-call limited switch 1, and then only stream in smaller props, decorative parts of the buildings, and characters/pokemon that are closer to the player. The player speed is also limited since you can't ride pokemon this time, which reduces issues with loading not finishing in time.
>>724134979>giant city
Would tendies genuinely be impressed in 2025 by GTA SA running on a base PS2?
>>724149709that's impressive optimization, reminds me of tears of the kingdom and how good that was the rope trick still can't be replicated
>>724149785that looked like shitmaybe it was good back then
>>724149916personally i am just impressed by the tard-wrangling it must have taken to keep people from shitting up the giant city mesh with a ton of detail that should not be rendered at all times
>>724150267they probably did it by not having that many devstoo many chefs you know?
>>724147394Anon, you unironically defended SWSH's N64 trees. It's a waste of keystrokes trying to talk with youJust try harder next time
>>724119026It called super switch
>>724150873?
